• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Football Finance

[article]According to the latest reports in Italy, Investcorp could sign the contracts for their €1.1bn take-over of Milan by Friday April 29.

The companies are already in advanced negotiations and in a two-week period of exclusivity during the due diligence, with a hope to complete the closing by early May.

Now Il Sole 24 Ore, the Italian equivalent of the Financial Times, reports that Investcorp are on track to sign the contracts in the Milan headquarters by Friday April 29.

Several of the initial obstacles have already been resolved ahead of schedule and they are moving quickly towards a conclusion.

Investcorp are a sovereign investment fund based in Bahrain, including figures who are also involved in the ownership of Manchester City.

The current Milan owners are Elliott Management, a US investment fund who essentially repossessed the club in 2018 when Yonghong Li failed to keep up repayments on a loan he had used to purchase the Serie A giants from Silvio Berlusconi.[/article]

 
I'm gonna guess it's either Binance or FTX that are competing for the shirt sponsorship deal.

Both of them are currently competing for Barca's shirt.
 
Liverpool have one more year left on their Standard Chartered shirt sponsor agreement and, while we’re still talking to them about an extension, options are being sought elsewhere too.
One report on Monday has the Reds talking with a “cryptocurrency exchange firm” and a “blockchain platform” over potential deals, with the suggestion of a £35m-a-year deal on the cards.
Setting aside the question over who gets their name on the famous jersey, it should be noted the figure is probably either incomplete or wayward; we already get £40m from the SC deal, so would surely be looking at an upgrade on that. It could be that the base rate is £35m, raising higher based on achievements.
No rush to sort anything on this front given any deal will probably appear a lot more valuable in a month or so if the Reds are champions of everything, but it’s good to see our revenue could be boosted yet again.

This is Anfield
 
Liverpool in talks to secure the most lucrative shirt sponsorship deal in football - worth £80MILLION - as Standard Chartered are told to double current offer to continue with the club

[article]Liverpool are in talks to secure an £80million-a-year shirt sponsorship deal, a package that would be the most lucrative in football.

The club’s arrangement with Standard Chartered concludes at the end of the 2022-23 season and it is understood talks to extend with improved terms have started.

The current deal is worth £40m-a-year but while the club and the British bank consider the agreement a huge success, it is understood Standard Chartered will still have to double their offer for it to continue.

The club are also speaking to a number of companies in financial services, travel and tourism, consumer electronics, fast-moving consumer goods, media and cryptocurrency exchange and blockchain.

Owners Fenway are bullish, having overseen huge progress since signing the current Standard Chartered deal at the start of the 2018-19 season. Since then the club have gone on to win a number of trophies, including the Champions League and the Premier League.

Liverpool have the biggest selling shirt in football according to merchandise analysts, with club officials expecting sales to pass two million for the first time this season.

The Anfield feel-good factor continued this week when manager Jurgen Klopp signed a new four-year contract, as the club continues to chase an unprecedented quadruple.

[/article]
 
Liverpool in talks to secure the most lucrative shirt sponsorship deal in football - worth £80MILLION - as Standard Chartered are told to double current offer to continue with the club

[article]Liverpool are in talks to secure an £80million-a-year shirt sponsorship deal, a package that would be the most lucrative in football.

The club’s arrangement with Standard Chartered concludes at the end of the 2022-23 season and it is understood talks to extend with improved terms have started.

The current deal is worth £40m-a-year but while the club and the British bank consider the agreement a huge success, it is understood Standard Chartered will still have to double their offer for it to continue.

The club are also speaking to a number of companies in financial services, travel and tourism, consumer electronics, fast-moving consumer goods, media and cryptocurrency exchange and blockchain.

Owners Fenway are bullish, having overseen huge progress since signing the current Standard Chartered deal at the start of the 2018-19 season. Since then the club have gone on to win a number of trophies, including the Champions League and the Premier League.

Liverpool have the biggest selling shirt in football according to merchandise analysts, with club officials expecting sales to pass two million for the first time this season.

The Anfield feel-good factor continued this week when manager Jurgen Klopp signed a new four-year contract, as the club continues to chase an unprecedented quadruple.

[/article]
They sold 2.45m shirts last season and had the 3rd best sales
 
So which is which? The DM is likely to be the dodgy source, isn’t it? They’re rather innumerate over there.
 
[article]Ligue 1 will take steps to control Paris Saint-Germain’s finances.

That’s according to L’Equipe as carried by Diario AS, who report that the DNCG, the financial body in charge of supervising the accounts of French clubs, will implement two new measures.

The first is that no club will be able to have a wage bill greater than 70% of its income. PSG’s currently wage bill is close to 91% of its turnover, so they’d have to trim this figure significantly.

Another measure to be implemented is that no club can have a debt greater than it’s share capital. This wouldn’t really affect PSG as they can constantly inject capital through QSI.

The moves come as part of a recognition from the French football authorities that PSG’s financial strength is out of control and is damaging the integrity of Ligue 1.

PSG are already crowned champions this season and sit 14 points clear of second-placed Marseille with three games to go. This is despite the fact that they’ve been heavily criticised this season and look likely to part ways with coach Mauricio Pochettino soon.[/article]
 

[article]MilanNews.it are reporting that new entrants in the race to buy AC Milan are making moves in the process. RedBird Capital Partners from the US are rivalling the bid from Bahrain’s Investcorp to purchase the club from Elliot Management. The report states that the American fund have overtaken the Bahraini one as they are offering 1.1 billion euros in cash compared to the 1.2 billion euros offer from the former which is 800 million in cash and 400 million through financing.

The same outlet is also reporting that the offer has been raised in the past couple of weeks as it was originally 1 billion euros for the club but is now quoted as 1.1 billion euros.
It remains to be seen if RedBird can hijack Investcorp’s bid given the talks are at an advanced stage.

Affaritaliani are one of the outlets really pushing the story of Elliot preferring RedBird’s bid but more confirmations are needed to confirm this.

The season ends in two weeks and it is almost certain for some movement to occur just before or after then.[/article]
 
Chelsea strike a double-your-money sleeve sponsor deal, with cryptocurrency firm WhaleFin paying £20m per year
[article]Chelsea have announced cryptocurrency firm WhaleFin as their new shirt sleeve sponsors for the 2022-23 campaign.

The Blues confirmed on their official website in the early hours of Saturday morning that American billionaire Todd Boehly and his consortium had signed an agreement purchase the club, following the UK Government's approval.

He has partnered with fellow Dodgers owner Mark Walter, Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss as well as investment firm Clearlake Capital.

And following Boehly's arrival in west London, the European champions have now confirmed a £20m-a-year deal with burgeoning group WhaleFin, who are set to replace South Korean car firm Hyundai as shirt sleeve sponsors next season.

WhaleFin is a digital asset platform owned by Amber Group, a company based in Singapore.

The deal marks Chelsea's first official move into the crypto market, weeks after Liverpool were linked with picking another such firm to replace their main shirt sponsor, Standard Chartered, and after Manchester United made a deal with blockchain group Tezos.

It is also worth double the amount of their current package with Hyundai, who sealed a five-year deal worth £50million (£10million per year) with the west London club back in 2018.

After confirming their agreement with Amber Group on Thursday, Chelsea CEO Guy Lawrence said: ‘This is a hugely exciting partnership for the club, which aligns us with one of the most advanced digital asset companies in the world.

'As Amber Group continue to expand coverage of their platform globally, they will now have the ability to not only speak to the hundreds of millions of loyal Chelsea fans around the globe but also be seen by the billions who tune into the Premier League each season.'

Amber Group CEO Michael Wu also added: ‘Our partnership with Chelsea FC is a watershed moment as we embark on the next stage of our growth globally. With the beautiful game’s ability to rally a global audience regardless of culture, language and nationality, we are excited to showcase the full potential of digital assets to an international audience.

'With a storied club history backed by a world-class team, Chelsea FC is a class act that we are proud to partner with, as we bring digitisation and crypto finance to global users. We are thrilled to be associated with one of the best teams in the English Premier League, and we look forward to unlocking new sporting experiences for football fans around the world.’

Government sanctions placed on Chelsea due to previous owner Roman Abramovich did not allow him to financially profit from ownership of the club.

It is reported that this sponsorship deal was signed in January, before the Government sanctions came into force.

Cryptocurrency firms are staking large amounts of money in the attempt to develop their brands, with WhaleFin also paying around £35m a year to sponsor the shirts of Spanish side Atletico Madrid.

Amber Group was recently said to be in talks to raise new funds at a valuation of $10bn or more, with their backers including Temasek Holdings, Sequoia China and Tiger Global Management, three of the venture capital arena's most prolific investors.

Chelsea are also thought to be considering replacing their main shirt sponsor Three.

Three were the first of the club's sponsors to suspend their agreement when Abramovich was hit by sanctions, calling for their logo to be removed from players' shirts and Stamford Bridge.

In the end that proved impossible, but Chelsea are already understood to be looking at alternative sponsors despite having one year left on their deal with Three.

Any replacement would have to be signed off by Boehly's new ownership group, who could look to bring in new sponsors immediately or let Three see out the final year of their agreement.[/article]
 
Reading that new shirt sponsor, the headline it could be worth as much as £80m.
One thing I don't understand is the discrepancy in shirt sales. We had reports we sold 2.45m units last season 3rd highest after RM and BM, yet new reports suggests we surpassed 2m for the first time, however, that figure makes the LFC the best selling shirt in the world
 
Reading that new shirt sponsor, the headline it could be worth as much as £80m.
One thing I don't understand is the discrepancy in shirt sales. We had reports we sold 2.45m units last season 3rd highest after RM and BM, yet new reports suggests we surpassed 2m for the first time, however, that figure makes the LFC the best selling shirt in the world

Could be wrong, but some figures may collate the shirts sold in the club shops and club website with the ones sold through Nike and other outlets, whilst others may not. We get 100% of the cash from shirts sold through our official outlets unlike anywhere else, so it may be counted differently. I've really no idea, though.
 
Could be wrong, but some figures may collate the shirts sold in the club shops and club website with the ones sold through Nike and other outlets, whilst others may not. We get 100% of the cash from shirts sold through our official outlets unlike anywhere else, so it may be counted differently. I've really no idea, though.
Nike and the club know exactly what we sold, and don't release the data. Everything else is probably based on guess work. I read Man U get 7% of any shirt sales, Ronald's deal translated into £187m in shirt sales. At £90 a shirt let's say, that's over 2m shirt sales just there
 
Does this mean they need to sell their stake in FSG? As far as I'm aware you can't own two clubs in the CL. Or does their stake in FSG fall under the threshold?
 
Does this mean they need to sell their stake in FSG? As far as I'm aware you can't own two clubs in the CL. Or does their stake in FSG fall under the threshold?

RedBird have 11% stake in Fenway Sports Group, 85% majority stake in Toulouse FC and will have 70% majority stake in AC Milan

[article]UEFA’s ‘Integrity of the UEFA Club competitions: Independence of clubs’ rule was adopted in 1998 and became effective for the 2000/1 season. This states that no two clubs or more participating in a UEFA club competition may be directly or indirectly controlled by the same entity or managed by the same person.

Having an interest in another football club is defined as meaning:
  • the majority of the shareholders’ voting rights in another club in the same UEFA club competition;
  • the right to appoint or remove a majority of the directors in another club in the same UEFA club competition;
  • the majority of the shareholders’ voting rights (through a shareholders’ agreement) in another club in the same UEFA club competition.

In 2000, ENIC – an investment company with stakes in six European football clubs – lodged a complaint with the European Commission against this rule, claiming that it distorts competition by preventing and restricting investment in European clubs. The Commission, however, rejected ENIC’s claim, stating that the rule can be justified by the need to guarantee the integrity of the competitions.[/article]

Seems to be okay for Red Bull…

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...t-Red-Bull-Salzburg-Europa-League-happen.html

[article]UEFA has very detailed rules outlining that two teams with very close connections are unable to face each other within their competition.

The issue came to the fore during the 2017 season when both teams qualified for the Champions League, and thus immediately ran the risk of being drawn to compete.

A month-long investigation was launched by the football authorities, prompting both clubs to make serious behind-the-scenes changes in order to comply with rules and facilitate the progress of achieving joint European eligibility.



The two sides worked hard to prove to UEFA they were two separate entities, with personnel within the hierarchy stepping aside to focus solely on one club or the other.

Following their investigation UEFA were satisfied the two clubs were not in breach of their regulations.

Prior to RB Leipzig achieving Champions League status following their incredible Bundesliga run of the 2016/17 season, the German side quickly went to UEFA with paperwork to show they were not in breach of article 5 of the organisation's rules - regarding the 'integrity of the competition.'

European football has strict defenses in operation to prevent two sides with 'common control' from meeting on the football pitch, particularly when the outcome could be influenced by an owner or owners' interest.

On their findings UEFA determined 'significant and substantial changes' had occurred within the structures of RB Leipzig and RB Salzburg to show separation and fair grounds on which to compete.

UEFA accepted 'no individual or legal entity had anymore a decisive influence' and thus both sides were permitted into Champions League action. They would not meet in the competition, but now have been served up against each other in this year's instalment of the Europa League.[/article]
 
There used to be a prohibition on owning more than 10% in two Premier League clubs - at the time of the On Digital venture, ITV bought 9.9% stakes in a load of clubs (including us) which was deemed to be fine. I assume the rule still exists (which, allegedly, would be why Usmanov used Moshiri as a proxy when he bought Everton) but it won't be a problem for Red Bird as they only have a stake in us and no-one else in the EPL.
 
AC Milan to be our 'sister club'?


[article]New AC Milan owner Gerry Cardinale has spoken to reporters today as Redbird Capital's takeover enters it's final stretch.

Cardinale met with Milan football chief Paolo Maldini in the morning, having spoken with president Paolo Scaroni and chief exec Ivan Gazidis last night.

He said, “I congratulate Elliott, Paolo and Ivan for what has been achieved in the last year and in the last weekend. I have been investing in sports for 25 years but what was achieved here last weekend is something truly incredible.
We visited the Milan Museum this morning and saw how much this club has done and how many successes have been achieved.

"We have the role of custodians and managers of what has been built so far. We must do it with humility and recognising the team and group work that you have achieved together. When I started in the world of sport, sport was different: today there are many interests involved, business and capital, there is a different commitment but always with the same feeling and determination to win. I hate losing, I feel like a winner like you are. The future will have to be built on the successes achieved so far with determination and will to win."

Cardinale was in Milan last weekend for the title triumph.

He continued: "Last weekend I lived it all with the soul of a fan participating in the celebrations: it was an extraordinary show. I lived the show of the World Series, of the Super Bowl of the NBA, but nothing gave me the enthusiasm, the excitement that I have experienced that Sunday. This relationship with the fans is very special: we must give them back everything they give us with their passion and enthusiasm. I hope that the show experienced on Sunday can be relived many more times with our fans.

"I started my Italian lessons and the first words I learned are: Forza Milan."[/article]
 
Really don't trust this cardinale character. I always felt the main reason why he bought into fsg was because he thought he was going to make a fortune from the European super league as that all camw out a few months after he bought into fsg. At the time he was mouthing off in some interview how tv rights were as regulated as the US and how there was money to be made .
 
FUQ5kPWUcAIpbN2
 
Back
Top Bottom