Don't Spain play Italy in the semi final?
EURO 2020
- Thread starter King Binny
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Don't Spain play Italy in the semi final?
England can't play Spain until the final ! Spain vs Italy is the semi.
Neuhaus is a no brainer from my side. Player with high upside, not to expensive, and you will always be able to sell him again.
No too familiar with the first league in Croatia. The others are okay but I just would go for Goretzka if you want the get the best players. But do you know Sascha Mölders? A machine and the best striker in the 3. Bundesliga (and he even has a beer belly but scores like no one else). I would go for him!
LUkaku, when Belgium needed him most, couldn't get it done.
Shocked.
Shocked.
And he played in another.
Someone needs to mock up a special meme for Ross.
Help us Kasper Dolberg.. you're our only hope.
3rd time lucky?
England vs Denmark
Firstly I don't think that the Eriksen incident will have any bearing whatsoever on this game. Once underway it won't even be a thought in their heads. Note also that Denmark have played 3 games at home so, like England, have had an advantage. Now however they'll be at Wembley with 59,000 English fans raising the sound level.
I see in some quarters people pointing out that England failed to beat Denmark in two matches during the Nations cup last year. 0-0 in Copenhagen and losing 0-1 at Wembley but that was with 10 men after 30 mins and conceding a penalty. Also of course with Eriksen and England are certainly now performing at a much higher level.
I can't see Delaney and Pierre-Emile Højbjerg winning the midfield without Eriksen and we saw the Czechs running that midfield after changing their formation at HT. England should do the same as their midfield is much stronger than that of the Danes. The Danish defence can be got at too, the Czechs were winning a good amount of headers, give the same amount of opportunities to Kane, Maguire and Stones and England will score from them.
The Danish strength is in their FBs (WBs) in Mæhle & Waas but I can see their effectiveness being limited up against Sancho or Saka & Walker on one side and Trippier and Sterling on the other. As for Germany and Ukraine, having to contain Sterling and Saka/Sancho meant less opportunity for their FBs to go forward, and that could be same for Denmark, more especially if they are losing the midfield battle.
I haven't seen many weaknesses in this English side. Maybe Mæhle vs. Walker if Mæhle can evade Saka/Sancho but Walker's pace usually gets him out of his occasional lapses. When considering the strength in depth to come off the bench for England it's going to be very very tough for the Danes (who also had a much more energy sapping match vs an energetic Czech Rep. than England's vs. Ukraine) to maintain their levels.
It would be a shock if England were to lose this, maybe Denmark will score but 2-0, 2-1, 3-1 to England is a more likely final score.
Firstly I don't think that the Eriksen incident will have any bearing whatsoever on this game. Once underway it won't even be a thought in their heads. Note also that Denmark have played 3 games at home so, like England, have had an advantage. Now however they'll be at Wembley with 59,000 English fans raising the sound level.
I see in some quarters people pointing out that England failed to beat Denmark in two matches during the Nations cup last year. 0-0 in Copenhagen and losing 0-1 at Wembley but that was with 10 men after 30 mins and conceding a penalty. Also of course with Eriksen and England are certainly now performing at a much higher level.
I can't see Delaney and Pierre-Emile Højbjerg winning the midfield without Eriksen and we saw the Czechs running that midfield after changing their formation at HT. England should do the same as their midfield is much stronger than that of the Danes. The Danish defence can be got at too, the Czechs were winning a good amount of headers, give the same amount of opportunities to Kane, Maguire and Stones and England will score from them.
The Danish strength is in their FBs (WBs) in Mæhle & Waas but I can see their effectiveness being limited up against Sancho or Saka & Walker on one side and Trippier and Sterling on the other. As for Germany and Ukraine, having to contain Sterling and Saka/Sancho meant less opportunity for their FBs to go forward, and that could be same for Denmark, more especially if they are losing the midfield battle.
I haven't seen many weaknesses in this English side. Maybe Mæhle vs. Walker if Mæhle can evade Saka/Sancho but Walker's pace usually gets him out of his occasional lapses. When considering the strength in depth to come off the bench for England it's going to be very very tough for the Danes (who also had a much more energy sapping match vs an energetic Czech Rep. than England's vs. Ukraine) to maintain their levels.
It would be a shock if England were to lose this, maybe Denmark will score but 2-0, 2-1, 3-1 to England is a more likely final score.
Easy England win
And Sancho does his aswell
Lol thats what my wife said in a round about way...its Englands greatest gift as a football team. But i cannot help and think back to thats how we Liverpool played in some of our games to win the title, all that passing at the back....
Yeah, my wife also complains that I bore her to sleep & then pounce on the counter attack.
Chiesa scores after a great break by the Italians.
1-0 Italy but Spain should be ahead just since ... tons of chances.
1-0 Italy but Spain should be ahead just since ... tons of chances.
We couldn't even afford Enrico.
- Status
Similar threads
