Are you seriously saying that as a set piece resulted from our pressing game, then the style is at fault? That explains why the teams that don't have that style NEVER concede free kicks or corners.Where did the set piece from the first come from and the 2nd had us out of position yet again.
This style of football will never win the league
Yeah, I'm getting that feeling too. He's saying some weird things of late.
Just by looking at that example in Ross's post and the Watford game, none of our players attack the ball at all. None.@Ryan, help us out here? Explain our zonal marking in comparison to successful examples of it please.
Oh has anyone else done this exercise yet?
I still love Klopp and can't think of any other manager I'd rather have. He's had to come out with weird comments because they club's not done anything to help him and he's having to make excuses for them. Which again shows his personality. Loved Rafa but hated him moaning about his employers, same as he's doing now.Often in our club, a new manager comes, gives a dynamite press conference, everyone is reminded of Shankly, has a couple of good transfer windows, wins a few cups, raises expectations, has a couple of bad transfer windows, press conferences resemble a paranoid wreck justifying his increasingly weird tactics and selections, and then gets fired.
We seem to have become more effective in recent times. Our managers directly transition from dynamite Shankly press conferences to weird ones and skip the winning cups step in between.
I still love Klopp and can't think of any other manager I'd rather have. He's had to come out with weird comments because they club's not done anything to help him and he's having to make excuses for them. Which again shows his personality. Loved Rafa but hated him moaning about his employers, same as he's doing now.
@Ryan, help us out here? Explain our zonal marking in comparison to successful examples of it please.
Oh has anyone else done this exercise yet?
What a wet fart of a sentence.
Big Sam:
https://talksport.com/football/sam-...-can-be-man-solve-liverpools-defensive-issues
[article]"So they're not going to give Mama Sakho a chance to resurrect his career at Liverpool then, no? No?," Allardyce said on talkSPORT during a discussion centred around the glaring need for Klopp to sign a new centre-back before next week's transfer deadline.
"He was fabulous for me honestly, he was outstanding. One of the reasons we stayed up at Palace was Mama's defensive qualities in the time he spent with us. He turned around what was a very leaky defence.
"They [Sakho and Klopp] fell out I think a long time ago. When he arrived with us, he'd been with the Under-23s [for] the entire season. With great credit to him, [he] comes straight into the side and started from day one performing at the highest level. He was very good."[/article]
He would be like a new signing, no?
I fondly remember the Agger v Sakho discussion...U don't rate him. He has his qualities, but he has that "accident waiting to happen" in him. Just like Lovren and Moreno.
And he finds himself on his ass far too often.
We need someone more consistent and more composed.
Still prefer sakho, even with his unprofessionalismI fondly remember the Agger v Sakho discussion...
pffft....Still prefer sakho, even with his unprofessionalism
x 2Still prefer sakho, even with his unprofessionalism
spills coffeeStill prefer sakho, even with his unprofessionalism
Many fans dislike Sakho because his movement looks clumsy, but that is deceptive. He is very effective in defence and pings great passes forward to the midfield.
Well summed up.We've been through this discussion many times before. Sakho, on the positive side is:
It's rare to find a defender with both good athleticism and passing, that's the stuff of potentially a top-class defender. Plus he's a natural left-sided CB, which is rare. But then come the negatives:
- strong and athletic
- mostly a very good passer
- has a mentality of a fighter
- is quite a nice bloke off the field by all accounts
- prone to lapses in concentration and general clumsiness
- prone to frequent muscular injuries, like Sturridge, and always takes longer than expected to recover and then to recover his best form. And when he's not in best form, that general clumsiness means he is a fucking liability.
- plays too much with emotion, tries to do everything by himself and is thus not very coachable – I suspect that's the biggest reason Klopp dislikes him. Klopp's defensive system relies heavily on holding a high line and the offside trap, so he needs defenders who are always aware of their position, stay on their feet and are ready to step up as a unit. Sakho, in contrast, has the unfortunate tendency to drop deep under pressure, a trait that was perfectly analyzed by Carra in the wake of that 3:3 CP game in the "nearly" season.
- In spite of his generally good athletic ability, not fast and not a great header of the ball
- finally, all kinds of unprofessional behavior, especially when not playing regularly – before the spat with Klopp, he had to apologize to Rodgers and there were problems at PSG plus the whole "doping" thing, for which he is at least partly responsible. So that kind of kills the idea of him being a 3rd or 4th choice at a top club – he needs to be a leader or he's a problem.
It depends if you are asking about the injury riddled finished Agger that he replaced or the splendid defender that was Agger in his primeWell summed up.
Would you pick him over Agger as well?
Well summed up.
Would you pick him over Agger as well?
Well summed up.
Would you pick him over Agger as well?