[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=40695.msg1124740#msg1124740 date=1277207391]
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=40695.msg1124722#msg1124722 date=1277205224]
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=40695.msg1124716#msg1124716 date=1277204760]
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=40695.msg1124711#msg1124711 date=1277204622]
I tend to agree with Squiggles on a lot of things, but I don't get this Hodgson fan calu bit. Is he related to you?
I get that he's managed some top clubs, but he's ended up at *Fulham*, hardly managing at the top level now, is he?
[/quote]
So what, Anita? Harry Redknapp was at *Portsmouth* when Spurs hired him. Spurs were in the relegation zone at the time; now they're in the Champions League. Given that the new manager's main aim is to stabilise us and get us back in the top 4, I don't see how being manager of overachieving Fulham is necessarily a disqualification for the job.
[/quote]
It isn't necessarily. But let's be clear, he's managing a mid table side with pretty low targets, so it's not too difficult to overachieve. I want a manager that's able to compete at the top level. People make the argument that Kenny hasn't managed at the top level for a long time, I think the same would have to be made for Hogson.
I really have my doubts about him being a manager that could convince our stars to stay and furthermore someone who can attract others to the club. And if we've got significant personnel threatening to walk out on the club if he's appointed, it already tells me it's the wrong appointment.
[/quote]
Which 'significant personnel' have threatened to leave if he's appointed?
EDIT: Oh, you mean Kenny?
[/quote]
You dnt need a grade in psycolgy to undertand that our best players will leave (including but not limited to Stevie G, Fernando and Mascher) if we can offer them 0 CL footie and Roy Parking-the-bus-Hodgson.
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=40695.msg1124722#msg1124722 date=1277205224]
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=40695.msg1124716#msg1124716 date=1277204760]
[quote author=LadyRed link=topic=40695.msg1124711#msg1124711 date=1277204622]
I tend to agree with Squiggles on a lot of things, but I don't get this Hodgson fan calu bit. Is he related to you?
I get that he's managed some top clubs, but he's ended up at *Fulham*, hardly managing at the top level now, is he?
[/quote]
So what, Anita? Harry Redknapp was at *Portsmouth* when Spurs hired him. Spurs were in the relegation zone at the time; now they're in the Champions League. Given that the new manager's main aim is to stabilise us and get us back in the top 4, I don't see how being manager of overachieving Fulham is necessarily a disqualification for the job.
[/quote]
It isn't necessarily. But let's be clear, he's managing a mid table side with pretty low targets, so it's not too difficult to overachieve. I want a manager that's able to compete at the top level. People make the argument that Kenny hasn't managed at the top level for a long time, I think the same would have to be made for Hogson.
I really have my doubts about him being a manager that could convince our stars to stay and furthermore someone who can attract others to the club. And if we've got significant personnel threatening to walk out on the club if he's appointed, it already tells me it's the wrong appointment.
[/quote]
Which 'significant personnel' have threatened to leave if he's appointed?
EDIT: Oh, you mean Kenny?
[/quote]
You dnt need a grade in psycolgy to undertand that our best players will leave (including but not limited to Stevie G, Fernando and Mascher) if we can offer them 0 CL footie and Roy Parking-the-bus-Hodgson.