I find it so infuriating that VAR is used in such an awkward, time consuming manner.
There's what, four referees in a room watching that footage? Surely the obvious thing to do is to make decide, & have the outcome of the decision based upon the pitch refs original decision plus their choice having seen the replay.
That way the 50/50 decisions will always be effectively decided by the pitch ref, who has the best feel for the match but no benefit of replays, but the blatantly wrong ones will be overruled by the VAR's as they can use replays.
It won't completely rule out every poor decision, but it'll eradicate almost all of them, the ones that remain would be the grey area ones that still cause arguments regardless, & most importantly, it'd speed the process up, cos last night that was a joke.
I get the idea of the autonomy of the pitch referee, but that's undermined entirely by telling him they think he might have got it wrong & to review it. He's already under immense pressure by his peers who have the benefit of multiple camera angles & replays, so he's more inclined to reverse the decision.
To have a system with potentially five professional reviewers using the system to see what they think, then passing that decision to just one professional to review it again & make a decision is fucking mental.