• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

As I keep telling you, these people are not scientists, they're not researchers, they're not even intelligent. They are a bunch of clowns taking your tax monies and producing nothing. You should kill them, not cite them.
 
You're arguing with the wrong person, it's Rosco that was using it as fact, where as it's exactly what you say, potential scenarios and what it'd look like under them.
 
You're arguing with the wrong person, it's Rosco that was using it as fact, where as it's exactly what you say, potential scenarios and what it'd look like under them.

Nope. I clearly said possibility - and acknowledged the admission of the myocarditis risk from the vaccine. I've a funny feeling you were one of the people who stood firm and said there was no evidence of it previously.
 
You're arguing with the wrong person, it's Rosco that was using it as fact, where as it's exactly what you say, potential scenarios and what it'd look like under them.

"In their latest FDA briefing they've admitted it's possible that more kids will be hospitalised by vaccine induced myocarditis than by Covid."


But that is a fact. Hansern fact checked it and found it to be false, which provides the final confirmation that it was a fact.
 
"In their latest FDA briefing they've admitted it's possible that more kids will be hospitalised by vaccine induced myocarditis than by Covid."


But that is a fact. Hansern fact checked it and found it to be false, which provides the final confirmation that it was a fact.

Thought you’d be in Austria given this was your chance of losing your virginity?

I didnt confirm anything. Just that Ross got it wrong, as he always does.
 
Nope. I clearly said possibility - and acknowledged the admission of the myocarditis risk from the vaccine. I've a funny feeling you were one of the people who stood firm and said there was no evidence of it previously.

Nope, I said that the incidence is very low, and the benefits of the vaccine outweigh it. Which is still true.
 
i5h9wfi00wy71.png
 
But what are the death rates per 100,000 with vaccinated vs unvaccinated? That's a better barometer, no?

Also, it seems it's the death toll rises for the vaccinated beyond the age of 50, as you'd expect. The majority of the young people that died there are unvaccinated.

And this is coming from an "anti-vaxxer"

Are they still doing that bullshit "within 28 days of a positive test" crap, though? It's all just a ball ache now. If you're young and healthy you're almost certain to be fine. If you're old and/or sick, get the jab. Easy.
 
But what are the death rates per 100,000 with vaccinated vs unvaccinated? That's a better barometer, no?

Also, it seems it's the death toll rises for the vaccinated beyond the age of 50, as you'd expect. The majority of the young people that died there are unvaccinated.

And this is coming from an "anti-vaxxer"

Are they still doing that bullshit "within 28 days of a positive test" crap, though? It's all just a ball ache now. If you're young and healthy you're almost certain to be fine. If you're old and/or sick, get the jab. Easy.

You'll never know. The 28 day thing is because they've taken your tax funding and then just moved some numbers around in excel to make an utter clown out of you.

Say 1000 people die in your daily population count. If you spent the taxpayer funding to do proper research, let's say you'd find out something like 20% of them actually died of covid. That's the true number, which you'd think is pretty fucking important to know. Alternatively, let's say you want to spend the taxpayer funding on prostitutes instead like Neil Ferguson, then you have a problem of how to get the number. The 28 day thing is their shite solution.

If you picked just 100 people randomly, then 20 of them will have died of covid, and you'll mistakenly say that all 100 died from it. That's no good. This is why you introduce the arbitrary 28 day cut-off, then your sample of 100 people (out of the 1000) who died 28 days later is more likely to contain people who actually died of covid (just for common sense reasons). Now these 100 people who you've excel filtered out, 40 of them will have actually died of covid. 40 is a mathematical improvement upon the random figure of 20. So you can use that slight improvement to plot graphs and it's just enough to show up a sensible trend. That's why they do it. And I'll tell you again, that's why you should kill them all before it's too late.
 
Happy days for the innocent shooter who did nothing wrong. Oh as long as he wasn't point blank and therefore in breach of social distancing guidelines, otherwise the bastards will get him on that.
 
So at the shooters trial he can claim he did not cause the death of this man.

The WHO and Australia say it was covid.
 
Typical lawyer, giving the bad guys ideas.

Better than a woke fool of a lawyer who tries to pass off virtue signals as evidence hoping the judge won't notice. The fucking state of this lawyer, things have definitely gone to shit since my day.

 
Ireland is going in that direction too. They have been careful to frame it as - we'll need to extend the use of the Covid cert beyond hospitality.
 
Ireland is going in that direction too. They have been careful to frame it as - we'll need to extend the use of the Covid cert beyond hospitality.

Who would have thought that shitting all over antigen testing and not having any real contact tracing in place and letting it spread through school children wouldn't be as successful as they hoped it would be. That COVID cert that was to be around for a month or two will be in place until next summer I reckon. They're still working on the wording but we will need it to get a fucking haircut by Christmas.
 
So at the shooters trial he can claim he did not cause the death of this man.

The WHO and Australia say it was covid.

I see you’re being as accurate as usual.

Auckland isn’t in Australia in case you didnt know.

I suppose you were kind of close.
 

The vaccine simulates an infection. The infection stimulates antibody production. The antibodies linger in your blood for several months before subsiding. You're comparing data from people at a time when they were recently juiced up to their eyeballs with antibodies to people who are clean. Yet, because it's data, plotted on a graph, you lap it up as science. Yet again read my lips these people are fucking morons, you'd do well to kill them instead of believing their embarrassing attempts at science.

This is why they suddenly need booster shots of the same vaccine they already gave you the first time. Your immune system did not evolve to have a perpetually elevated antibody count circulating around your body. It's no different to abusing steroids. You're abusing the vaccine and there will be consequences. Maybe Mr Egypt up there is aware of that too because his private doctors are not morons. I'll remind you about these consequences when they happen.
 
Back
Top Bottom