I guess you imagined the bit where I said that.
Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I guess you imagined the bit where I said that.
Fucking have mercy. The percentages are on a rolling basis, one week to the next. They show a trend in which the infection rate between unvaxxed and vaxxed is closing fast. If you look at the the latest report, and find the gap has closed and reversed in most age groups, then the trend is correct. If the trend is correct, there is no fucking reason on earth for a conspiracy theorist to make up alternative numbers, changing them a little bit for lols, then posting the same trend in percentages with their changed +/- numbers for the lols.
You can't conclude that from the latest report, fine. So go ahead and work out the percentages starting from the first week they use, and go week by week. I can't be arsed for obvious reasons. The reports are not in a consistent format, and some of them you'll have to go to the appendices or look up the references to find the data. Have fun.
You can't conclude that from the latest report, fine. So go ahead and work out the percentages starting from the first week they use, and go week by week. I can't be arsed for obvious reasons. The reports are not in a consistent format, and some of them you'll have to go to the appendices or look up the references to find the data. Have fun.
Have fun. Once you get the data, it will take you probably quite a while to think about it, what it means, and then figure out what is going on with the infections and the vaccines. Then, you'll have replicated everything I figured out in the time it took me to tell you I couldn't be arsed (explaining it to you).
[article]
The rate of a positive COVID-19 test varies by age and vaccination status. The rate of a positive COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals up to the age of 29. In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of a positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated. This is likely to be due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
[/article]
Here's what the report you didn't like says about the trend. A variety of reasons. So satisfyingly vague. I'm sure you can do better than that. You don't have to, it will waste your time, but you know you can explain the trend with more precision and accuracy than that. Much more. But then five minutes later you'll go back to following the science and telling yourself those scientists know more than dantes. They don't even know more than you.
The rate of a positive COVID-19 test varies by age and vaccination status. The rate of a positive COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals up to the age of 29. In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of a positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated. This is likely to be due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
[/article]
Here's what the report you didn't like says about the trend. A variety of reasons. So satisfyingly vague. I'm sure you can do better than that. You don't have to, it will waste your time, but you know you can explain the trend with more precision and accuracy than that. Much more. But then five minutes later you'll go back to following the science and telling yourself those scientists know more than dantes. They don't even know more than you.
The info you need is in the 2 columns on the right.
Those columns appear to show that a shockingly large percentage of our population across all age groups has blood cancer. Or else they show the vaccine is turning to shit, which is a downright absurdity, so once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains however improbable etc. therefore it must be the case that everyone has blood cancer instead.
I'd love to see Fauci get his comeuppance and get locked away for the rest of his life, but I won't hold my breath.
Funding the research lab is a good thing, right? The bad part is covering it up, and the fact that it (most likely) didn't have the right safety procedures in place.
Well, they funded a global NGO, who in turn funded the lab without actually telling them. But, I would speaking in more general terms than that. It seems, although dangerous, like research that could lead to significant medical advances.
Yeah, that's my issue. The covering it up, the censorship of any discussion or inquest into what went wrong, the lies and the corruption... they're all the things he should be locked up for.
Obviously research into coronaviruses, and other viruses, is what should be happening, but something is gonna go wrong sooner or later when you're actively trying to make viruses more deadly and contagious to humans. I understand why they do it, but still. It's asking for trouble.
The rise in cases in the UK is pretty much all secondary school kids if you look at the ONS site. Teacher types, are kids getting tested loads now? Last week 8.1% of every secondary school kid had covid, which seems mental high. All other ages after leaving school seem flatlined at about 1%, which is still fucking high but very different.
To make weapons.
To try and predict what they will mutate into and get ahead of them, so they're better placed to deal with it in case there's a breakout
Has that ever worked?
Dunno. Maybe. It does seem stupid, but on paper, if we were an infallible, diligent species, it could work. But we're fucking mongs, so it was bound to backfire eventually.
Low vaccination rates, no social distancing and high testing rates, I'd guess?
Also my guess.