• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

I’m beginning to think that Dantes is actually Ross’s wife.
 
The comparison is fine. The total sample size is the people in each age group that got each vaccine. The expected value of heart inflammation is taken from some other previous data across the entire population, then the percentages from that are used to calculate what you'd expect to find in the vaccinated groups if all else is equal. So it's quite logical to compare that with the observed cases of heart inflammation.

So as a scientist, you'd have a theory that the vaccine is safe and is not linked to those heart inflammation cases (the frogfish theory). The tables above are how you'd test your theory, you'd predict that the number of heart inflammations will fall within the expected range (the frogfish prediction). Lo and behold, the observations disprove your predictions and disprove your theory. It's a shame that lots of young people now have needless heart conditions in order to find this out, but you live and you learn (the frogfish philosophy).

It isn't. In the first scenario, n=765, which is the total number of reports of it. The sample is all people that reported it, not a random 765 people. Then it's comparing that to the number of people out of 765 that it'd expect to report it. It makes no sense.
 
It isn't. In the first scenario, n=765, which is the total number of reports of it. The sample is all people that reported it, not a random 765 people. Then it's comparing that to the number of people out of 765 that it'd expect to report it. It makes no sense.

No, that's not what it's comparing. The population of all vaccinated people is everyone they've taken from the VAERS database. Let's say that is 100,000 people. So out of that 100,000 let's say they expect there to be 10-20 reports (just based off historical data of heart inflammation). That is the expectation range. Then they actually found there were 765 reports (the observed cases in their seven day window). So they're comparing those two numbers, split up by sex and age group.
 
I think it's best if you don't argue with anti vaxxers who've been vaxxed.

If you want to blindly "follow the science" until it gets you killed, I'm totally fine with that too. Just don't sully the reputation and good name of science in the process is all I ask. Call it data science or something, follow that, then we're good.
 
No, that's not what it's comparing. The population of all vaccinated people is everyone they've taken from the VAERS database. Let's say that is 100,000 people. So out of that 100,000 let's say they expect there to be 10-20 reports (just based off historical data of heart inflammation). That is the expectation range. Then they actually found there were 765 reports (the observed cases in their seven day window). So they're comparing those two numbers, split up by sex and age group.

If it's doing that, then they haven't said it in those screenshots anyway. But, as Woland said, it's kinda a pointless discussion, so will leave to your "science".
 
If it's doing that, then they haven't said it in those screenshots anyway. But, as Woland said, it's kinda a pointless discussion, so will leave to your "science".

So you didn't read the CDC report but decided to criticise it anyway ?

Very scientific.
 
I found the report myself. It's 2,574 total reported cases in the US in all age groups, so from the 170m people vaccinated, it's not a per 100,000 or anything like that. It's also got a big disclaimer that it's not the views of the CDC on it.
 
I found the report myself. It's 2,574 total reported cases in the US in all age groups, so from the 170m people vaccinated, it's not a per 100,000 or anything like that. It's also got a big disclaimer that it's not the views of the CDC on it.

That can't possibly be correct. Either you've misread it, or these researchers don't have any understanding of basic arithmetic beyond what they did in primary school.
 

Page 13. They give the reports per million vaccines for each grouping. To get the total population you'd have to add up all the rates, work out the fraction it is out of a million, then scale it according to the 2574 total reports. That's a lot of work. They could have just stated how many people they were looking at on page 13. They didn't bother to. So neither will I. Fuck the CDC.
 
Page 13. They give the reports per million vaccines for each grouping. To get the total population you'd have to add up all the rates, work out the fraction it is out of a million, then scale it according to the 2574 total reports. That's a lot of work. They could have just stated how many people they were looking at on page 13. They didn't bother to. So neither will I. Fuck the CDC.

Yep, and then compare that to the overall risks involved with not taking the vaccine. It turns out to be a no brainer.
 
Says the person whose contribution was a massively incorrect fact check website.

My contribution has been to advise you to seek some help.
Other than that this thread is just amusing entartainment really about any information shared by you or your forum wife.
But its all gone a bit sad now.
 
It's like the last thirty pages discussing the vaccine efficacy and viral mutations were wiped from your brains. Well, it is what it is.

You got vaxxed.

I got vaxxed.

Ross got vaxxed.

Numerous others on here got vaxxed.

We’re all still here.

Only Ross got more than a “hangover”.

Less people seem to be dying.

What else...
 
(a) Vaccination drive: less people seem to be dying, it works, the past data doesn't lie, everyone get jabbed, follow the science, spread socialism!

(b) Climate change: the temperatures seem to be the same as always, it won't last, the future data will be doom, follow the science, stop capitalism!

Do you see how your analysis of data is completely the opposite on these two issues? The last words on socialism/capitalism give you a clue on why you've been told to think the way you are happy to think. You actually have no idea about either phenomenon, and your ignorance is being exploited to make you vote for socialism. That's all it is, and it is what it is.
 
It's like the last thirty pages discussing the vaccine efficacy and viral mutations were wiped from your brains. Well, it is what it is.

I'm taking to ignoring anything you've said tbh, it's a long time since you've been right about anything in this thread.
 
My contribution has been to advise you to seek some help.
Other than that this thread is just amusing entartainment really about any information shared by you or your forum wife.
But its all gone a bit sad now.
Thank you.

I've discussed it with myself and we think you're not worth listening to
 
(a) Vaccination drive: less people seem to be dying, it works, the past data doesn't lie, everyone get jabbed, follow the science, spread socialism!

(b) Climate change: the temperatures seem to be the same as always, it won't last, the future data will be doom, follow the science, stop capitalism!

Do you see how your analysis of data is completely the opposite on these two issues? The last words on socialism/capitalism give you a clue on why you've been told to think the way you are happy to think. You actually have no idea about either phenomenon, and your ignorance is being exploited to make you vote for socialism. That's all it is, and it is what it is.

Are you talking to me?

Seriously.

I’m a socialist voter now - how does that work?
 
Are you talking to me?

Seriously.

I’m a socialist voter now - how does that work?

We've been over this. You get a vote every four or five years. Part of your ignorance is you think that is the vote which counts. It don't. Money is what counts. Socialism is the transactions that involve the state or any entity that is not incentivised to produce better goods and services (e.g. every state contractor, every global corporation that lobbies the state, disney, etc.). All the financial transactions occurring on the planet which includes those as one of the parties = socialism. Every other financial transaction between businesses, their employees, consumers, private contracts = capitalism. One of these is good for the common man. One is not. There is no debate about which is which, if you even attempt to debate, it just means you're a moron who might as well debate flat earth while he's at it.

So your votes are the bits of paper in your wallet. You voted for disney, look what happened to your precious intellectual property when you did that. Because of your ignorance, because of your woke mindset, because of your virtue signals, because of your inability to analyse data properly or think for yourself, that globalist training you're lapping up leads you to vote for socialism, to elect socialist goods and services, and then you will receive socialism.
 
Back
Top Bottom