Beer has been cancelled before many times throughout history in many places. Dantes has never been cancelled.
There’s a Colombian post graduate student somewhere that considers you cancelled.
Beer has been cancelled before many times throughout history in many places. Dantes has never been cancelled.
You know if you didn't come across as a half Alf Garnet and half Alex Jones hybrid, people actually might read what you write.Aww you're still asking it as a question. Bless your little cotton socks. Nothing will stop them doing it to you. Within a decade you will know to just keep your head down, be a good earner of social credits, and hopefully with a bit of luck your miserable life may pass without incident.
There’s a Colombian post graduate student somewhere that considers you cancelled.
You know if you didn't come across as a half Alf Garnet and half Alex Jones hybrid, people actually might read what you write.
We know where you stand politically but does every post have to be a dig at the left or be about wokism?
For the government to freeze their assets, this is civil law (or administrative law), where the government just need to take a reasonable decision. The oligarch can judicially review the decision to impose sanctions, which unless I'm their lawyer they will lose because the government didn't act unreasonable or illegally in making the decision to freeze the asset.
Once the asset is frozen, the government obviously wants to get their hands on it because they're tory scum. So usually you use the time you have whilst the money is locked up to let the police investigate. This is now criminal law, and you have to prove a crime was committed beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of terrorism, you can prove the imam was financing an isis cell and then use the proceeds of crime act to keep the money (to pay legal costs, and give out what's left to the victims / tory donors). In the case of mafia gangsters, you can prove the money was extorted or stolen from people, or is revenues from selling weapons and drugs. Then again you can use the proceeds of crime act to take the money. In this case, there is no way to prove anything of the sort. Even if you had witnesses, they'd commit suicide long before the trial.
What the plan is here is to avoid criminal law altogether. The government want to pass the bill that gives them the right to take the monies under circumstances set out in the bill (which they are presently writing and making tyrannical changes too). Then the oligarch is back to having to sue the government via judicial review, which they'll lose.
The oligarch will still be a billionaire. The issue is the poor working class bastards who did nothing wrong will now be subject to this bill, and have no means of protecting their assets apart from judicial review. Doesn't effect me, I'll wipe the floor with the government in the high court. But everyone else is fucked.
There’s a Colombian post graduate student somewhere that considers you cancelled.
It's really funny, seeing you pretend to know anything.
There’s a Colombian post graduate student somewhere that considers you cancelled.
I assume she's still in his basement
Two posts above. Don't tell me you have red rose on ignore? Harsh!The Premier League has disqualified Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich as a director of the club after the oligarch was sanctioned by the UK government.
😀Two posts above. Don't tell me you have red rose on ignore? Harsh!
Oops ! Sorry RR 😗Two posts above. Don't tell me you have red rose on ignore? Harsh!
Oh, that’s going to take the cake in hypocrisy.
Wait till you see Chelsea fans defending Yemen and coming in dressed as Sheikhs.
No badge?
No badge?
Maybe at some point the Premier League should look at some other billionaire owners and their record of crimes against humanity. Just a thought.
So if Chelsea are going to have to sell some of their players, who would we take?
Havertz as a Bobby replacement?
James (utility man) as Milner replacement?
Would Klopp give Werner another chance lol?