Salad got a pen a few weeks back for a kick.
swings and roundabouts
Salah had control of the ball when he was kicked.
Salad got a pen a few weeks back for a kick.
swings and roundabouts
For me it was much like the game mid-week in that Klopp made the wrong choice with the starting line up
Front three...
Mane should have started, and if anything be subbed off later in the game...
Either play Frimino, or Jota... Is it just me or does Jota have a greater effect on the game when he start in the centre of the three...?
Why play Mane when he was obviously already absolutely knackeed? How is that a less naive choice? When you're in the two game a week situation, your most logical choice is to pick a completely new first eleven. No one can do that in practice, of course, so your next rational option is to either rest whomever your medical team tell you to rest, or, failing that, just cherry pick your best players for a rest, and then fill-in accordingly. That's pretty much it at present. No wonder Klopp looks shattered and very, very pissed off.
Who gives one shiny sh!te, let alone two, WHAT "a lot of rival fans" think, assuming they do any feckin "thinking" at all?
Gary Lewin (ex-Arse and England physio) has said this morning that the pressures on players this season could take two or three years to get over.
Salah had control of the ball when he was kicked.
I thought that there was actually something woven/built into the ball to make it 100% accurate? As in it's not reliant on cameras? Maybe that was a dream.Maybe the margin error actually work better due to the current lack of accuracy of the current setup with lack of fps ?
Doesn’t the goal line tech also have some accountability for margin of error factored in?
Because if the lines touch. Give the benefit of the doubt. At the moment they go down to 0.00002cm it seemsAs I said in another thread, I cant get why people think this "margin of error" will improve the situation. The argument switches from whether a player is level or 0.5cm offside to one of whether he is 10cm or 10.5cm offside
As I said in another thread, I cant get why people think this "margin of error" will improve the situation. The argument switches from whether a player is level or 0.5cm offside to one of whether he is 10cm or 10.5cm offside
The argument for that though is the 5cms covers the potential fps inaccuracy, so if he's 6cms offside then that really lessens the argument that he may actually have been onside (though the maths I gave above suggests the margin for error is actually much greater, but it's better than it is now).As I said in another thread, I cant get why people think this "margin of error" will improve the situation. The argument switches from whether a player is level or 0.5cm offside to one of whether he is 10cm or 10.5cm offside
But at least 50% of the arguments about VAR offside decisions are where the lines are drawn ... so does this really solve it?Because if the lines touch. Give the benefit of the doubt. At the moment they go down to 0.00002cm it seems
And that's if the lines are drawn correctly. If...
Partially. Because it would give leeway for both the FPS issue and the human error in drawing the lines.But at least 50% of the arguments about VAR offside decisions are where the lines are drawn ... so does this really solve it?
I think perception plays a part in how refs treat us so yes I care and I think it’s important.
He’s made his point and needs to park it now.
I honestly can't believe we're now in the age of football where peoples arms can be offside
Yet.HAHAHA at least it's not nose hairs.