Can we have a graph showing trumps worth over the last 60 years and how it should be had it been linked to inflation? Hasn’t he become “poorer” than he should’ve been because he’s a shit businessman.
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Why would I take it on the chin when I couldn't give a fuck about it? You've just turned into a boring fan boy of some cunt who happened to be born into money and bullied his way to making more money. Like those dickheads who worship the royals or follow the bloody Kardashians you come in here and spout shite which no one cares about except those nutters who argue with you.
You're the one going on about his boxes and mentioning my name. Because you have TDS or some sort of issue. All I care about is the economy, I was a fan of his economic policies, now he is not in office I have no further interest in him. You're the boring demented cunt who seems obsessed with Trump's life, frothing over january 6, then frothing over his made in china maga hats, frothing over his boxes, what's next? I pointed out the important stuff, the economy, how your comical stupidity got his effect upon the economy completely wrong, and you don't like that, and want to fantasize that I'm a fanboy? I'm just smarter than you, which isn't hard, that's what you don't like.
Ahhh but Trump is a big fan of both and let them do what they like while he was in office so that won’t fly with the brilliant saviour of the common man theory…
For example, you come in here of your own volition and spout this like some sort of child. I'm discussing economics, like an adult. How do we get from there to you bitching about fanboy and boring and dantes being a cunt? I think you need to have a look in the mirror and grow up because you're a fucking child yeah.
This is an example of how you discuss economics “like an adult”.
There you have it.
Do we get to think of all the people that died as a direct result of Big D and his policies?
I’m not even sure you know what the word “despicable” means.
You seem to be a severe case of Asperger's Alzheimer.
Once in a while you need to be reminded that you're an idiot in case you'd forget. Athens is only trying to help.
You can try, but your thought process would be riddled with so many limitations and flaws, and I've lost interest in debating or correcting it, so you'd just be left with an incorrect answer you might as well have picked out of a hat. At least with inflation you don't need to think for yourself, the economic data is already there for you, in a graph, which you can look at, and no argument would be pending.
Did you really mean “evolving”?
Last edited:
I mean he does evolve. He absorbs new news articles.
What did I get wrong and not see? What are you talking about? Are you capable of referencing a single example of this?
Why waste my time?
I'm not asking you to waste your time. You ought to already have several examples in mind from which you came to the idea that I am incapable of seeing when I'm wrong. But you obviously don't have any, which means it's just a story you've made up about me from inside your head to help you cope with how easily I showed you your view on inflation was wrong.
And you only expressed that view to explain to me why you'd still have voted for Biden. So Nomad, now that it's wrong, you ought to be capable of admitting you would now vote for Trump. So, it's actually you that is incapable of admitting that you were wrong.
Last edited:
Nope I'd vote Biden every time.
In which case, get fucked and don't ever speak to me again.
Hahahaha.
So you keep waffling on about, despite the evidence of Trumps chaotic handling of COVID while in office and the fact that he’d have likely supported Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.
Inflation would be as rampant under Trump as it is now.
Mate. There really is no point in explaining. He is incapable of seeing the error in his workings.
That's not my question. I have no interest in what you would have done based on something you feel would have happened. I asked you what you would have done based on what you know did happen.
I have no interest in what you feel would have happened. What did happen is Putin didn't invade Ukraine under Trump, about 400,000 of an unvaccinated population died of covid under Trump, inflation was around 2% under Trump, Putin did invade under Biden, over 650,000 of a vaccinated population have died under Biden, inflation has risen to over 8% under Biden.
Yep.
Anyway, posting in here is mostly to keep him contained from infecting other areas of the site and to provide entertainment to everyone else.
Its’s like being forced to watch Indiana Jones & the Crystal Skull because Raiders of the Lost Ark was entertaining and great fun.
It's a one word answer to the question, who would you vote for? I didn't ask you to start inventing a soap opera about your posting woes and life.
Sorry - I don’t like working within your made up constraints, so I’ll answer it how I see fit. I think you can infer that it wouldn’t be Trump.
You can also infer, if you are so “minded”, that if there was another credible option - then it wouldn’t have been Biden either.
Fascinating discussion this!
Just ban the fuckwit, please.
Similar threads
- Locked
