[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=36589.msg972338#msg972338 date=1256635133]
[quote author=madmax link=topic=36589.msg972330#msg972330 date=1256634701]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=36589.msg972322#msg972322 date=1256634007]
[quote author=grjt link=topic=36589.msg972321#msg972321 date=1256633883]
However, I think youre right in that whatever the cause of Aquilanis injury issues, it is less likely that he will get bashed quite as often playing a little further up the pitch
[/quote]
Who got 'bashed' more on Sunday... Masher or Torres?
I was under the assumption that a DM is the one doing the bashing on the opposition's attacking players.
[/quote]
an Am plays between the defense and midfield, and there have been a whole lot of tiny number 10s.....so its reasonable to conclude that they get bashed up a little less.
Neil's point is that as Aqui is not going to play DM, he won't be bashed up as much.
Neil you agree to above?
Lets stop this bitching...
[/quote]
Well that's like saying Lucas doesn't get bashed as much as Masher. The demand on our midfield two, in terms of workrate/teamwork, is practically the same. Both have to do their fair share of the defensive duties, while one sits and protects more and the other is given a bit more license to attack (not much it seems).
How many times have teams forced errors by targetting Lucas? His defensive frailties have been highlighted on many occasions this season, so suggesting that one is less likely to be 'bashed' is wrong.
In even more simplistic terms, the more attacking of the two is likely to come up more against the opposition defensive players, whereas Masher is more likely to be comfronted by attacking players (who are, by virtue of recent points on this thread, more 'lightweight), so none of this point about one being able to be significantly more lightweight than the other, really holds any water.
[/quote]
I was trying to paraphrase Neil's argument. This thread is all over the place like a mad cow's piss. I don't know what is going on anymore....