None of our midfield targets are going to go below 50m this summer.
Having rethought my "PL only" stance, the only DM in this league that's potentially obtainable who will make me forget about thuram or ugarte, is lavia.
McAllister and Lavia seems like a bitter pill to swallow though
Looks like we wont be getting any of our midfield targets then will we.None of our midfield targets are going to go below 50m this summer.
Read quite a bit from the Brighton fans.
They all love Mac Alister, but it's fair to say that Caicedo is the one they fear the most. They said all his best performances have come in a deeper midfield position, however, Mac Alister is all too often trying to make the number 10 position work for him and he just hasn't got the incisive passing and shooting to really justify it. They seem to think that Enciso will be able to cover for the loss of Mac Alister. Encisco is definitely one to watch if you haven't seen him before - looks like a terrific talent.
The Brighton chairmen will refuse to negotiate. They set a price for their players and if it's not met it's a firm no. I'm hoping Mac Alister has some golden-handshake price or clause that we can activate which is sparking our interest and that fee is no more than £60M. He's a cracking player, but that would be my top end.
I have nothing against MacAllister - he is exactly the kind of player who brings multiple positive intangibles to their team that can be the difference between winning and losing a trophy. He is a winner, no doubt, and he’s a good footballer.
But is he £70M good? He doesn’t have the speed and athleticism of a top-class midfielder and while he does really well to compensate in other aspects, you don’t pay this kind of money for intangibles - you buy a midfielder that will dominate in every aspect of the game. I can’t help but feel that a team that will pay big money for MacAllister this summer are basically suckers - they could have bought him for peanuts just 12 months ago but failed to see the potential. We should be looking for the next MacAllister, not overpaying for the current one.
Agreed. The only way this will happen is if there's some clause we take advantage of. The whole world knows we're after midfielders this summer and no-one - bar possibly Chelsea with Mount - needs to sell. I don't think Alexis is worth £70m but to be honest I'm less bothered about the price on an individual basis as I am about whether the price affects our ability to land the other players we need.
I doubt that.If we end up signing him then he’ll be our new penalty taker.
I rate MacAllister, however I'm inclined to agree.
I find it really worrying that we seem to be focusing all our attention on PL hype players.
It's not to say these players are all bad, it's just that they represent really poor value for money and given that we seem to spend our lives crying about money, it's a really strange market to do home in on.
My thoughts exact.I have nothing against MacAllister - he is exactly the kind of player who brings multiple positive intangibles to their team that can be the difference between winning and losing a trophy. He is a winner, no doubt, and he’s a good footballer.
But is he £70M good? He doesn’t have the speed and athleticism of a top-class midfielder and while he does really well to compensate in other aspects, you don’t pay this kind of money for intangibles - you buy a midfielder that will dominate in every aspect of the game. I can’t help but feel that a team that will pay big money for MacAllister this summer are basically suckers - they could have bought him for peanuts just 12 months ago but failed to see the potential. We should be looking for the next MacAllister, not overpaying for the current one.
Romano saying Alexis wants a move to Liverpool.
not sure i want us to sign sanchez - maybe 8 years ago
He replaces Thiago and scores more goals.
JC is injury prone.. Probably not and Tielemans would be better value and probably give you the same output. Personally, I would spend the money getting Ugarte and Thuram.Curtis Jones does the same and is cheaper. Not saying CJ is as good as Mac Allister but wondering as rurik, dmish, keni and others have pointed out - Is the price differential worth it? We need to stretch a limited amount over multiple positions.
Curtis Jones does the same and is cheaper. Not saying CJ is as good as Mac Allister but wondering as rurik, dmish, keni and others have pointed out - Is the price differential worth it? We need to stretch a limited amount over multiple positions.
You are definitely going to be a thirty year old virgin.JC is injury prone.. Probably not and Tielemans would be better value and probably give you the same output. Personally, I would spend the money getting Ugarte and Thuram.
fucking don'tHim and Ward Prowse baby!
Wouldn't make too many jokes about it, it's not too far off what we'll end up with.Him and Ward Prowse baby!
Wouldn't make too many jokes about it, it's not too far off what we'll end up with.
No pleasing some of you cunts.
70m yes please. Shut up and take my money.
24 years of age and solves one of the CM problems.