[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=35837.msg944227#msg944227 date=1253093649]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35837.msg944217#msg944217 date=1253090340]
Me too, I still think he is a better defender that Skrtle, OK shoot me , I can't prove it, it's just they are different types which makes it harder to judge. Skrtle is a no nonsense defender, Agger uses his brain a bit more.
One, as long as he gets a run and stays fit, will float to the surface as clearly the best option.
regards
[/quote]
people go on about the 'no nonsense' and the strength and the pace which gets him out of tight situations, if you read the game you can definately get away with a lack of pace and you don't have to be built like arnold either. I'm definately not impressed by defenders that are continually making last ditch tackles, yes it looks wonderful but better positioning cuts out the danger at the source, prevention is better than cure. how many last ditch tackles did sami ever make? you can count them on one hand.
[/quote]
Heard all this shite a million times now.
Just because a player is fast and can put in last ditch tackles, it doesn't make them any less aware, and to suggest that Skrtel isn't adept at spotting danger is bollocks, he's quick enough to come across another player and snuff out the potential problem, he does it in practically every game. Carra's been a 'last ditch man' throughout his career, it's a common balance to have in defence, a good reader of the game and someone to mop up and put his foot in and generally do the ugly stuff. It doesn't make one more important or 'better' than the other, it's different styles and both are fairly essential I'd have thought.
It's just as naive to suggest that because a player is slower they automatically read the game better. Yeah Agger is the thinking mans choice, because he's more elegant in possession, compliments Carra AND Skrtel, and will weigh in with a couple of goals, but the argument over him having any greater edge is neither here nor there. We've conceded goals when either have partnered Carra (or Hyypia for that matter) and we've equally looked rock solid in spells too.
As a unit and individually our defence is excellent, the flaws that seem to rear their head have cropped up whatever the personnel. Last season, we shipped four against Chelsea with Skrtel at the back and then in the following game we shipped four again against Arsenal, with Agger at the back.
This bollocks about us looking a better team with Agger at the back has been proven just that, time and time again. Both by us looking sluggish and short of inspiration with Agger (or Skrtel) in there at times and by us looking like a good, fluid unit with Skrtel (or Agger) in there.
As said, until both have had a reasonable, injury free run you can't state a case either way really, it's all just conjecture based on who looks better on the ball and a shed load of inaccurate stereotyping.