Thiago.... Ja ????
- Thread starter HC
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Strange taste in mates too.
That's one thing he's gotten right.
Boom.
I think we might be better for that swap in an attacking sense, but there's no doubt Gini is much more solid defensively, and probably better for the team overall. Plus he's a lot more robust and hardly ever injured. I wouldn't be in a rush to go through with that deal.
Hal out on the town with Paul Gorst:
Haha he's tall, but I'm no short arse!
Did you see us walking around Sefton Park last week!?
Perfect height ratio for a gobbleHal out on the town with Paul Gorst:
The Liverpool board has told boss Jurgen Klopp to sell players such as Guinea midfielder Naby Keita, 25, to fund a move for Bayern Munich and Spain midfielder Thiago, 29.
https://www.kicker.de/4000000034681...die-reds-mehr-als-nur-ein-problem-der-abloese
If we do have to sell a player to fund Thiago I would sooner it be AOC than Keita, and if that choice boils down to Keita and Thiago we should keep Keita. At 25 Keita will only get better, While Thiago has hit his peak
So little difference between FSG and Mike Ashley
https://www.kicker.de/4000000034681...die-reds-mehr-als-nur-ein-problem-der-abloese
If we do have to sell a player to fund Thiago I would sooner it be AOC than Keita, and if that choice boils down to Keita and Thiago we should keep Keita. At 25 Keita will only get better, While Thiago has hit his peak
So little difference between FSG and Mike Ashley
I might be wrong, but I just don't see us selling him even if he doesn't sign.
Which would be extremely stupid.
Kicker going overboard to find a way to help sell Thiago. There's no way Keita, Gini (unless he continues to refuse a new contract) and I'd probably say AOC as well considering how much Klopp likes him, will be sold. We don't have enough midfielders as it is, 7 is likely the minimum we require.
I'd guess that depends more on what he'd fetch. If it is a low figure due to age/wage demands then that is likely a figure we'd be happy to amortise over a season. However if we can get (pure guess) £20m or more to basically cover the cost of Thiago, then I could see us letting him go. But we'd still need another midfielder in that case.
Interesting on Gini. Are we looking at him through red-tinted glasses ?
Just on Morse's MoM table (where is @Morse - seems to have gone AWOL and the table with him).
Hendo miles ahead, even the other midfielders, with I suspect (without checking) less minutes, are ahead (Fabs) or just behind him (Ox, Keita, Millie). Checking the WhoScored rating though he has relatively high scores (close to an average of 7 per game) which sort of bears out what our eyes tell us ... a highly reliable but unspectacular (unless we are playing Barca) midfielder, the water-carrier.
Just on Morse's MoM table (where is @Morse - seems to have gone AWOL and the table with him).
Hendo miles ahead, even the other midfielders, with I suspect (without checking) less minutes, are ahead (Fabs) or just behind him (Ox, Keita, Millie). Checking the WhoScored rating though he has relatively high scores (close to an average of 7 per game) which sort of bears out what our eyes tell us ... a highly reliable but unspectacular (unless we are playing Barca) midfielder, the water-carrier.
Well we currently have Hendo, Fabs, Gini, Keita, Milner, Ox, Jones and Grujic. There arent enough games to go round as it is. If Thiago joins Id expect at least one midfielder to go, more likely 2.
Why would Kicker try to help sell Thiago...?
If that's true, that seems like a big "fuck you" . Win CL Super Cup, WCC, and PL, generate £40m in sales through transfers yet he still has to raise more cash through transfers.
These owners are worse than stan kroenkre and Joe Lewis
Rather than Thiago I would sooner go for Boateng as we can not rely on Mapit fitness, we have all but sold Lovren a CB is needed more than a Midfielder at this point
It’s almost like there isn’t enough money left after huge bonuses to players and staff, redeveloped stadium and training facilities followed by a drop in income due to a pandemic.
Because they are Bayern's mouthpiece to some extent.
Chelsea, City, Arsenal Utd are all in the same boat as far as the lost revenues goes due to the pandemic yet the are still investing in player, as said we have just come off the back of winning the CL,Super Cup,WCC and the Premier League you can not tell me that we have not made at least £200m in revenue through sells of merchandise etc all the shirts bought when we won the sixth CL (Even if you just had an extra star added to you old shirt, then the WCC bagde, and now the Champions symbol, bagde etc...
Even Arsenal are looking to spend £100m... Maybe if finishing in the bottom two or three in American sports meant you were religated to a second tier these cunts would invest more in the manager and club...
In a very extreme and tiny way I would love to see if we were religated next season, and stayed down for the season after that if FSG would still be here, I am guessing it would be a big fat No
Please explain how our circumstances are the same as city, Chelsea and Arsenal. Have they developed their own infrastructure? Do they have the same wage structure as us? Do we have a massive pile of cash from last seasons player sales? Did we receive any extra money from NB for extra merchandise?
You’re being ridiculous over this. Just calm down. We don’t need massive money pumped in to the squad. We need 3 or 4 squad players. Hopefully Lewis is one of those.
We just won’t go out and spunk a hundred million quid on a credit card just for the sake of doing so. That’s not how this club works.
You’re being ridiculous over this. Just calm down. We don’t need massive money pumped in to the squad. We need 3 or 4 squad players. Hopefully Lewis is one of those.
We just won’t go out and spunk a hundred million quid on a credit card just for the sake of doing so. That’s not how this club works.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
