• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Yes Pearce, what a great idea!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hansern

Thinks he owns the place
Member
Pearce reveals C'ship plan
U21s boss wants youngsters to play in second tier


Can we put an England Under-21 team in the Championship to play games every other week?

Stuart Pearce wants his England Under-21 side to play in the Championship to help the development of promising young players.

Pearce believes the progression of his charges is hampered when they become fringe players at Premier League clubs and miss out on important game time.

But the former Manchester City boss, who also labelled the delay in getting the National Football Centre in Burton agreed "a massive crime", has proffered a solution.

The 48-year-old wants the under-21 players who are not in action for their clubs to play friendlies against Championship sides every other week.

Plan
"Can we put an England Under-21 team in the Championship to play games every other week?" Pearce told the Life's a Pitch website.

"Don't play home games, just play away games, so there's an odd number of teams in the Championship.

"So I get 21 friendlies a year. On top of that all these players that are not playing regularly of a weekend can come and join me and when I have the opportunity to play European Championship qualifiers I would have had a team playing together that basically know each other inside-out.

"If I had, let's say, a Daniel Sturridge, who was with us at Manchester City, and he was on the bench, my options are this: he either goes away and plays a game for the under-21s in a friendly against a good Championship side or alternatively plays in a friendly God knows where on Wednesday night where he's thinking to himself 'I don't want to be here'.

"But it's whether it can be sold to the clubs, it's whether they really want to put the club hat on or really want to do something radical instead of coming back every two years or four years after a major tournament and a disappointment and turn round and say 'we're going to have to do something'.

"They're throwaway lines. If we're serious about doing something, let's do something.

"That's probably why we've waited 10 or 12 years maybe to get the National Football Centre sanctioned.

"For me that's been a massive crime. That should have been done 10 years ago."

Pearce also feels the next England manager should have a CV to match that of Fabio Capello and Jose Mourinho, suggesting he would not consider himself a candidate.


Experience
"I think the England manager's job is for someone with the experience and the CV of Fabio Capello," he added.

"That's what the FA needs, to have four or five candidates to put a CV on the table when the job's available that's comparable to the likes of Fabio or Mourinho.

"But we need as many good English candidates to put their CVs in, to want that job. The only way to do that is by backing our young managers."
 
In principle its sound.

It would also be impossible to implement,anyway.

Besides it not as if any other national teams need to do this to get results.

Maybe we could just sack off christmas like every other top league and throw a few friendlies into the mixer
 
We have the national Under-23 side playing in our local professional league here in Singapore. They get arnd 30+ games a season and are surprisingly not a the whipping boys of the league.

Progess has been up and down though. Good idea, but it would be hard to answer to the clubs in England since they will be ones paying the salary. Over here, the football association pays the players.
 
[quote author=DHSC link=topic=42929.msg1224040#msg1224040 date=1290764601]
We have the national Under-23 side playing in our local professional league here in Singapore. They get arnd 30+ games a season and are surprisingly not a the whipping boys of the league.

Progess has been up and down though. Good idea, but it would be hard to answer to the clubs in England since they will be ones paying the salary. Over here, the football association pays the players.
[/quote]

Yeah, I thought it was a good idea, and still is. We need that for a young league and a small nation. Guess the main diff is that for our U23 side, they belong to that team, instead of a parent club.

As for England, some other issues will be the 25 men squad - does it allow these U21 players to be recalled back/included into it, when their parent clubs need them - be it injuries/suspensions? What about wages? Will the FA subsidize a portion of it? What if the youngster gets injuried - imagine suffering a serious injury for one of the '21 friendlies', as Pearce brand it. Then, there's the motivation factor - for instance is there relegation/promotion - will it be fair to include this system for the U21 team if the players are owned by parent club? What if they are playing against parent club etc.

I'd think the Spanish's leagues way of allowing B/reserve teams into the lower leagues will be slightly more feasible than this one that Pearce raise up.
 
Doesn't some League let the reserves play in the lower leagues?

That would develope them faster, playing in front of thier own fans in a proper league?

Say start them all off in the conference and let them get promoted like normal teams?

There would have to be a limit though, so you don't get all the big teams in the Prem and thier 'B' teams too.
 
As if Championship clubs would agree to playing the extra matches.

Their schedule is already more time consuming than many PL clubs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom