[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Among teams rated at the level of an average Premier League team or higher, Klopp improved Liverpool by a higher degree in his first two years with the club than any other manager in the Twenty First Group dataset, which extends back to 2008. Just look at that line:[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
The problem for Liverpool, then, is a pretty simple one: The best coach for Liverpool is the coach that just said he's leaving Liverpool.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]How could Liverpool replace Klopp, and who should they pick?[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Now, it's not impossible to replace Klopp. Liverpool knows this better than anyone.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
In 1974, Bill Shankly suddenly retired after 700-plus games in charge of the club. This 2020 Guardian column about Shankly could just as easily have been written about Klopp yesterday:[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Shankly, of course, was replaced by Bob Paisley, who then led the club to even greater success. Klopp himself said that he only felt comfortable leaving Liverpool because he got the team "back on the rails." The midfield has been totally rebuilt, and the side that finished fifth last season is back on top of the table.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
The next Liverpool manager, then, doesn't need to be the next Jurgen Klopp. The next Liverpool manager will be taking over a team that already is one of the best in the world -- not the one Klopp inherited, which averaged a sixth-place finish in the six seasons before he showed up.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
And while Klopp deserves all the credit he gets for Liverpool's recent era of success, he is the first to admit that he couldn't have done it without the players. And one of the big reasons that Liverpool have so many good players is that they had the most analytically advanced front office of any big club in the world.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Liverpool's rise wouldn't have been possible without Klopp, and it wouldn't have been possible with the people who helped find the players who would fit best with Klopp. Famously, Klopp wanted to bring in Julian Brandt to play alongside Sadio Mané and Roberto Firmino, but sporting director Michael Edwards and the research department convinced him to take a chance on an Egyptian winger named Mohamed Salah. Imagine if that call went the other way?[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
While Edwards, his successor Julian Ward and head of research Ian Graham have all left the club over the past two years, the rest of the research department remains in place. After a year of wayward, coaching-driven recruitment, this summer's midfield rebuild suggests the club has started to return to its more objective decision-making process. Interim sporting director Jorg Schmadtke will leave the club at the end of this month, and so Liverpool will need to replace him before they bring in their next manager.[/BGCOLOR]
LIVE ON ESPN+ (SELECTED GAMES)
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
While Klopp is a larger-than-life figure, Liverpool's next coach doesn't need to be that. In fact, he probably shouldn't even be that. Instead, the next Liverpool manager likely needs to work within the more modernized structure that Liverpool used to great success while Edwards was still with the club: The data department identifies a list of targets for the position of need, then the coach and the sporting director pick between those options.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
So, what does their next coach need to be? What makes Klopp and Liverpool's data-driven approach work so well together is that Klopp wants to play wide-open soccer with lots of chances, and the nerds across all sports have found that coaches should be much more aggressive than they are on average.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
"Jurgen is to be credited for it because he was willing to compromise on some players," Graham told me last year. "And he liked good players. A lot of managers don't have an eye for a good player."[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Xabi Alonso of Bayer Leverkusen, surprise leaders in the German Bundesliga, is currently the betting favorite for the job, and it's a hire that would earn near-universal approval. Per that Twenty First Group metric mentioned earlier, Alonso has improved his squad over his first two seasons more than that of any coach other than Klopp and Diego Simeone at Atletico Madrid. (Eddie Howe, current Newcastle coach, and Roberto Mancini, who was fired by Manchester City in 2013, also rate above Alonso on the list -- it ranks coaches going back to 2008 -- but most of that improvement comes down to sovereign wealth funds buying their club and spending tons of money.)[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
The big hitch in this idea is the way Leverkusen plays. Liverpool have built a team of players who thrive in vertical chaos, pressing and pushing the ball up field, over and over again. Leverkusen, though, rank in the bottom 10 of all teams in Europe for the percentage of their passes that go forward and the speed at which they move the ball up the field. Klopp's Liverpool also allow the fourth-fewest passes per defensive action (PPDA) with 9.2, while Alonso's Leverkusen allow 13.2, which is below the Europe-wide average.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
While Alonso could shift his approach to match Liverpool's personnel or vice versa, we just haven't seen either of those things happen yet. Given that, this is not as obvious of a hire as it might seem on the surface.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
play[/BGCOLOR]
1:08
'I'm not made of wood!' - Klopp on emotional win vs. Norwich
Jurgen Klopp reveals how he felt returning to Anfield for the first time since he announced he would leave Liverpool.
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Per Twenty First Group's similarity metrics, which compares coaches across the statistical outputs of their players at various positions, Alonso's approach has a 63% match with Liverpool's style over the past two years. Two of the most similar coaches -- both over 90% -- are Germany manager Julian Nagelsmann and Brighton's Roberto De Zerbi. Nagelsmann, though, would have to leave a high-profile national team gig right before a major tournament (the Euros). Meanwhile, De Zerbi's Brighton are even slower and less vertical than Alonso's Leverkusen.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Instead, my mind keeps coming back to one name: Thomas Frank. He is currently coaching Brentford and, I'd argue, is a better fit than all the aforementioned options.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Uh, the dude coaching the team currently in 14th place?[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Per Twenty First Group's performance rating, Frank is the third-best coach outside of the England's "Big Six" clubs in the Premier League, Spain's big three in LaLiga, Bayern Munich and Paris Saint-Germain. In other words, he is one of the top candidates in the pool Liverpool will be selecting from.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Why does Frank rate so highly? Here's how the Premier League compares by non-penalty expected goal differential over the past two seasons:[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Eighth best. So what?[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Per the site FBref's estimates, Brentford had the smallest wage bill in the Premier League last season. This season, only the three promoted teams have smaller payrolls. Plus, that relatively impressive underlying performance was often without their best player, Ivan Toney, who missed five games last season and has only played once this season, due to suspension.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Only Brighton rivals Brentford in terms of outperforming their resources, and Brighton rely much more on undervalued player identification than Brentford do. On top of that, Frank oversaw a significant stylistic shift in Brentford's play as the team went from the Championship to the Premier League, and he is used to working within a data-fluent environment where the manager doesn't have unlimited power.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Thomas Frank is probably not the first name on most lists to replace Jurgen Klopp at Liverpool -- but maybe it should be. Gaspafotos/MB Media/Getty Images[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Perhaps most importantly, Brentford aren't totally dissimilar to Liverpool. Among all of the teams in Europe that move the ball upfield at 1.25 meters/second or faster and allow 11 passes per defensive action or fewer, only Barcelona and Liverpool have a better expected goals differential than Brentford do this season.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
That's not to say there's no risk. Frank doesn't have the same cachet among players that Klopp does, or that Alonso might. Plus the expectations of managing Liverpool aren't the same as at Brentford. At Liverpool, you're trying to win every game you play, while at Brentford, a draw is basically a win in nearly half of your games.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
It's just that every managerial option carries with it a good deal of risk. There is not another Klopp out there because there isn't another Klopp. The only truly slam-dunk hire for Liverpool would be if they somehow convinced Guardiola to leave Man City, which isn't going to happen.[/BGCOLOR]
[BGCOLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]
Hiring Frank would not excite fans or the media in the same way that Alonso or Nagelsmann or even De Zerbi might, but based on how well Brentford have done with a relegation-level budget, I do think that in Frank, there's a potentially great manager hiding in plain sight. After all, just hiring the normal one worked out pretty well last time, didn't it?[/BGCOLOR]