Wonder if he'll get away with comments like this again.

[mark1975]

Seeing as the answer to the thread is "No" and the conspiracy nuts have been shown up again, case closed.

Conspiracy nuts? Whatevers. He gets away with blue murder most of the time.

 

[Judge Jules]

Zackly. Now and then he miscalculates and goes too far, probably because so many blind eyes are turned to his behaviour so often, not least by the few on here who insist on squawking about "conspiracy nuts" and doing their "See no evil" schtick.

 

[Rosco]

See this is why I hate people bumping threads, if someone had started another thread I wouldn't be inclined to point out to JJ that if you go back to the start of the thread you'll see a number of people making complete fucking idiots of themselves.

You do look nuts lads, well done.

 

[Judge Jules]

Pot, kettle.

 

[Jack D Rips]

So ferguson eventually gets asked to explain his comments, and is charged for ONE event after getting away with numerous similar or worse offences, and those who query it are called conspiracy theorists and nuts.

Indeed there are those on here who read far too deeply into ferguson's influence, but anyone who doesnt believe that he gets away with stuff that others dont, are naive in the extreme.

Even the cunts on Sky's soccer saturday concluded that the FA are afraid of ferguson after his rant following the Swansea match.

 

[Oncy]

'HE'LL GET AWAY WITH IT HES ALL POWERFULL!!'

Charged!!

'WELL......*splutter*....he....got away with loads of other stuff!'


Dear me.

 

[mark1975]

Whatevers, we're all nuts and you're all too cool for school cunts.

Get fucked. Manc loving bellends.

 

[Rosco]

OMG - those intellectual heavyweights on Soccer Saturday, like Paul Merson, agree.

 

[Jack D Rips]

'HE'LL GET AWAY WITH IT HES ALL POWERFULL!!'

Charged!!

'WELL......*splutter*....he....got away with loads of other stuff!'


Deary me.

Fixed it

 

[Jack D Rips]

OMG - those intellectual heavyweights on Soccer Saturday, like Paul Merson, agree.

The point was that those are the bellends who would lick ferguson's arse.

 

[Oncy]

Look how cross people get when they look foolish.

 

[mark1975]

Did anyone find out why Fat Sam didn't get invited to 'explain' his comments about the officials?

 

[mark1975]

Look how cross people get when they look foolish.

Haha.. yeah ok. You're all happy to give it out though, don't sit there with the other bellends then like a smug cunt going "look at all those dickheads in Liverpool, they're all fucking para".

Like I said, explain why Sam didn't get the same treatment. Oh.

 

[Rosco]

Look how cross people get when they look foolish.

At least we're giving them the opportunity to feel hard done by and sorry for themselves.

They love that.

 

[themn]

 

[mark1975]

At least we're giving them the opportunity to feel hard done by and sorry for themselves.

They love that.

Yeah we do, maybe it's a Hillsborough thing, thanks for that Boris.

 

[Oncy]

Haha.. yeah ok. You're all happy to give it out though, don't sit there with the other bellends then like a smug cunt going "look at all those dickheads in Liverpool, they're all fucking para".

Like I said, explain why Sam didn't get the same treatment. Oh.

Hahaha.
Not ALL of you mate.

 

[Insignificance]

Well, it seem like at last the journous are starting to question what the hell that rant against the linesman was all about in the first place. At least over here. But they don't have to worry about being invited to any celbration of the bestest manager for the bestest club in the history the day he finally calls it in!!!

 

[Fallon]

The ginsoak twat is trying to appeal;

Man Utd: Sir Alex Ferguson denies FA misconduct charge
Sir Alex Ferguson has denied a Football Association charge over comments he made about an official after Manchester United's Premier League game at Spurs.
The Manchester United boss, 71, accused assistant referee Simon Beck of failing to give Wayne Rooney a "clear" penalty.
The FA asked Ferguson to explain his comments and charged him on Tuesday.
He has requested a paper hearing, which means he will send a written submission rather than appearing in person. The FA is yet to decide the hearing's date.
When it charged Ferguson with misconduct the FA stated: "It is alleged the Manchester United manager breached FA Rule E3 in that he implied that the match official was motivated by bias."
Ferguson had until Friday afternoon to reply to the charge, which came as a result of comments made during a post-match interview on 20 January at White Hart Lane.
The Scot had appeared incensed after his side had their request for a spot-kick turned down prior to Clint Dempsey striking an injury-time equaliser for Spurs in the 1-1 draw.
"There was no way the linesman was going to give that - he gave them everything," said Ferguson after the game.
"It was a clear decision. And he was 10, maybe 12 yards away from the incident and he doesn't give it. And yet he gave everything else."
The Scot also referred to a previous incident involving Beck in the 2-1 defeat by Chelsea in April 2010.
Despite Chelsea striker Didier Drogba looking offside, Beck allowed the winning goal and it proved a pivotal moment in the Premier League title race, which Chelsea eventually won.
"I am disappointed with him [Beck] - we have not had a good record with him," Ferguson told BBC Sport after the Spurs match.
"With Chelsea a couple of years back, he gave onside to Didier Drogba and he was three yards offside. You remember these things because it is in important games and that was an important game."

From BBC

 

[RedStar]

It seems to me that Fergusons "power" is something like Voodoo or a placebo effect, if you dont believe in it you can see thats its obviously total bullshit. If you do believe in it you will find evidence of its influence pretty much anywhere. His 'mind games' are in the same vein

 

[Judge Jules]

The fact that he relies, as all bullies do, on what other people think doesn't make it any the less real or effective. When Roy Keane first became a manager he asked Ferguson what the key to good management was. Ferguson's answer? "Power and control". There is no "conspiracy" at work, because there doesn't need to be. Far more often than not, people do what he wants anyway.

 

[mark1975]

I still want to know why Fat Sam didn't go through the same procedure.

 

[Jack D Rips]

£12,000 fine

 

[Mystic]

That's less than a days wages, this is basically we're gonna punish you by not punishing you, its pathetic.

 

[Hansern]

Ha, that is absurd. Hasnt he got a 2-3 games ban suspended from another case aswell?

 

[hamstrung_pigeon]

What's the reason he got fined more than Allardyce (8K)? Looking at both cases, they should be fined the same amount for what they said. If Ferguson gets a heftier fine, is it because of his past infractions? And if it's due to his past infractions, shouldn't it be a lot more serious than just a $4K increment in fines, given his long list of such violations?

 

[737Max]

What I don't understand is that player can get their bans extended for a frivelous appeal and i know he's not appealed in this case but it's clear as daylight he's guilty, so what the hell is the point in the fine? As others have mentioned he's got previous so why not ban the cunt from the dugout for say 6 games. He clearly feels he can get away with it every time. Surely a lengthier ban will clearly show him he can't keep getting away with making comments like he did a few weeks ago? Oh and this Respect campaign can get to fuck because it's quite clear not everyone follows the latter of the law