Aren't they contradicting their own stances by paying the Glazers for their match tickets and any food / drink they consume while there, all whilst protesting the fact that the Glazers are there at all?
Surely for them (and us now, which is why I bring it up at all), the only real message they'd understand is a full boycot of a game / number of games?
Does anybody think that would ever happen? The players would know that the protest wasn't a lcak of support for them... Wouldn't the short-term pain be worth the potential long-term gain?
I'm surprised that a real effort to make this happen hasn't taken place by now.
Surely for them (and us now, which is why I bring it up at all), the only real message they'd understand is a full boycot of a game / number of games?
Does anybody think that would ever happen? The players would know that the protest wasn't a lcak of support for them... Wouldn't the short-term pain be worth the potential long-term gain?
I'm surprised that a real effort to make this happen hasn't taken place by now.