oopsy
Which match am I? (Let's play a game!)
- Thread starter SummerOnions
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
oopsy
Funnily I think it will be quite obvious once you find out the game
So there must be a lot of significance in the last bit.
Indeed that is the more significant bit
There is even a further clue in this
Not right but on the right track.
He's not Scottish.
Gemmil also played for the blueshite
Do you need to be Scottish to be a Scott?
Count did use the extra "t" in this response:
No, but the clue said 'a Scot scores' so it must be either a Scottish player or a player called Scot, or both.
Scott Parker is neither.
warmer
Ah so he's not Scottish?
I think it's Scott Dann because he's a Scouser I think.
Not really sure of the game though. I don't remember him scoring against us tbh.
Not really sure of the game though. I don't remember him scoring against us tbh.
Getting very warm now.
Scott Dann scored a late winner for Crystal Palace and We (some fans) walked (out early)
Klopp said at that moment he felt Alone
Yeah, but you said Scot.
Scott isn't the same as Scot. Nor is Scott Dann Scottish.
So...
Sorry I'm too pedantic to let this shit go lol.
Scott isn't the same as Scot. Nor is Scott Dann Scottish.
So...
Sorry I'm too pedantic to let this shit go lol.
Well, to be equally pedantic I said a Scot,
Which could be construed as someone from Scotland or someone christened with one of the different spelling variations of the name Scot.
Scot, Scott, Skott etc.
If I wanted to make it clear that I was referring to someone called Scott I simply would have said "Scott scored"
No that doesn't hold up. Names don't belong in categories like that. For that sentence to be even close to literally true you'd have to at least put inverted commas round Scot, or something. As it was, it was misleading.
Anyways.
That's a proper riddle.
I should have known, with your history of clues related to transfers.
You are being too narrow minded Peter
I'm surprised you're even arguing the point tbh. I wouldn't have mentioned it but the clue was pretty tightly worded, with multiple misdirections (Scot the name, not the nationality, a scorer against us rather than for us) and needed a lot of parsing to get any useful guidance from. To have a chance you need to be able to eliminate as many possibilities as you can, and I relied on the presumption that the spelling would be correct to deduce that we were looking for a Scottish player, not a player roughly called Scot. To be able to fairly trick people with the closeness of spelling between Scot and Scott you might, for example, have written 'a Scot more or less won the game....'.
Anyway, it's ultimately a minor quibble. tomasjj's turn.
Anyway, it's ultimately a minor quibble. tomasjj's turn.
- Status
