And he was still shit at 30.
Which to a degree is also bollocks because no-one, at the match or not, and I've been to many, follows all 11 players for 90 mins. They follow the ball. It's not really a difficult concept to grasp. You make it sound like people at the match see the minutiae, they don't unless it's right in front of them and differing seat positions give a totally different perspective of the game and incidents (Woland even mentioned that from his seat trying to determine if a player at the other end was 10m or 20m from goal etc. was difficult). And as I said, midfielders are in the frame far more often than not and a reel of a player's every touch in a match isn't selective, it's illuminating because nobody's memory is that good.Hahaha...
Quite though. Which is what does my fucking head in at times with some posters, it's the same ones who bring up selective stats and highlight reels to prove their point beyond any doubt. Meanwhile someone who was actually at the game (shite seats or not) and actually followed the movements of various players with and without the ball can say with some validity and perspective, how much of a good game they had, how workman like the performance was, what their movement was like on and off the ball, etc. It's not really a difficult concept to grasp, we've been labouring this point for weeks. ...........
I didn't say it's as good. I said you see a player's performance in a different light because his every touch is shown. The rest I addressed above.Lol, as if looking at every touch in a game is as good seeing a player live. Even the old player cam used to do my head in as it was too close to the player. You need to be able too see the whole pitch and other players in relation to the player, what they do between touches, their movement to receive the ball, their movement to not receive it, to make space for others. Their communication, awareness, reaction. All things you don’t see through a video of all their touches as you at the mercy of the camera man. You must not go to many live aports games as you can pick up so much more being there than on TV........................
Roy Keane when I watched him for Ireland was amazing too.
Well there's a lot of hyperbole in that and I can't be arsed going through it all however as far the goals is concerned this season : Hendo 0 (from 600+ more mins), Gini 2, Milner 5 (2 open play nd 3 pens), Fabs 1, Lallana 0, and most of those have many more mins on the pitch playing in their favoured positions and also played in the CL matches (Keita has had 54 mins in the CL). Basically none of our midfielders score many goals !When you pay 60m, wait a year and are promised a box to box jizz fest people will be highly critical when you aren’t adding an instant improvement. As for forgetting the good, nobody does that but when the bad outweighs the good by prob 5-1 it’s easy for people to simplify it to he’s shite as opposed to he’s shite except that one half or that one pass.
Great players are brilliant most of the time not a couple of times in 6 months.
Hopefully he’ll turn it around but I can completely see why so many are so frustrated. This isn’t a Lucas type signing of youth with potential this was supposed to be the missing link and one of the most sought after players in Europe.
He’s stunk the place out so far by an odd glimpse.
Zero goals is incredible considering the chances he’s had and the number of games
Which to a degree is also bollocks because no-one, at the match or not, and I've been to many, follows all 11 players for 90 mins. They follow the ball. It's not really a difficult concept to grasp. You make it sound like people at the match see the minutiae, they don't unless it's right in front of them and differing seat positions give a totally different perspective of the game and incidents (Woland even mentioned that from his seat trying to determine if a player at the other end was 10m or 20m from goal etc. was difficult). And as I said, midfielders are in the frame far more often than not and a reel of a player's every touch in a match isn't selective, it's illuminating because nobody's memory is that good.
I don't disagree that for people at the match it's a different, and oft times valuable, perspective but you are imbuing spectators at the game with a God-like power to assess, and when many come away with differing opinions (just check the MotM ratings from different people who go to games) that is clearly not the case. Which is what does my fucking head in at times with some posters.
I didn't say it's as good. I said you see a player's performance in a different light because his every touch is shown. The rest I addressed above.
Bollocks.The last time I saw Suarez at Anfield i spent the whole game watching him.
Well there's a lot of hyperbole in that and I can't be arsed going through it all however as far the goals is concerned this season : Hendo 0 (from 600+ more mins), Gini 2, Milner 5 (2 open play nd 3 pens), Fabs 1, Lallana 0, and most of those have many more mins on the pitch playing in their favoured positions and also played in the CL matches (Keita has had 54 mins in the CL). Basically none of our midfielders score many goals !
Bollocks.
Most of our midfielders only ave. 5-6 over a full season, and that's the best of them. More Dreamy hyperbole.Most who actually play a decent amount do score though. He should have 5 or 6 by now.
He's been rubbish.
Hopefully he's turned the corner but he has a long way to go to prove it yet.
Most of our midfielders only ave. 5-6 over a full season, and that's the best of them. More Dreamy hyperbole.
I suspect its the opposite. For the same reason as it was for Firmino & other players we signed.Does Keita need a bit of gym work? I notice he seems to lose balance quite a bit. I've lost count of the times I've seen him picking himself of the ground after an attempted tackle or dribble. I think the same happened to Bobby when he first joined he seemed like he couldn't get to grips with things physically but then after a while he adjusted. Hopefully it's the same situation with Keita.
Goal against the mancs, please.
You wouldn't prefer his press numbers to get over 38 p90?
A gain of 0.7 may seem small, but would have huge incremental gains across the field
Which to a degree is also bollocks because no-one, at the match or not, and I've been to many, follows all 11 players for 90 mins. They follow the ball. It's not really a difficult concept to grasp. You make it sound like people at the match see the minutiae, they don't unless it's right in front of them and differing seat positions give a totally different perspective of the game and incidents (Woland even mentioned that from his seat trying to determine if a player at the other end was 10m or 20m from goal etc. was difficult). And as I said, midfielders are in the frame far more often than not and a reel of a player's every touch in a match isn't selective, it's illuminating because nobody's memory is that good.
I don't disagree that for people at the match it's a different, and oft times valuable, perspective but you are imbuing spectators at the game with a God-like power to assess, and when many come away with differing opinions (just check the MotM ratings from different people who go to games) that is clearly not the case. Which is what does my fucking head in at times with some posters.
I didn't say it's as good. I said you see a player's performance in a different light because his every touch is shown. The rest I addressed above.
Most who actually play a decent amount do score though. He should have 5 or 6 by now.
He's been rubbish.
You're becoming as hyperbolic as Dreamy.God like power? I'm saying watching the whole game and assessing it from a different perspective than a highlight reel or a stat sheet, often gives you a more realistic view of someones performance. Lukaku is a brilliant finisher, but you can observe all the things he doesn't bring, like workmanship, interplay, movement outside the box, etc from actually watching him, watching full games, rather than highlights of him tapping the ball in for a team that's flying, for example. And that's where you just don't have any perspective and can't accept criticism, because you'll draw on whatever positive to try to deem any criticism as invalid and ultra negative. That's what gets my goat. Yes it's great that you're a red through and through and think this unshakable acceptance of poor displays is some form of superior fandom. When in actual fact it's just grating, superfan bullshit. He'll score a couple of goals and next you'll be making bold predictions about a 15 goal return next year.
IT'S NEVER FUCKING ENDING.
If ever proof were needed that Keita really is going to be a decent player, here it is. DB telling us how shit he is.
Whether he becomes a decent player will never change the fact up until now he’s been shite.
Never mind the fact that we want something more then decent for what we paid.
When you've been to pretty much every home game for the past 35 years you're not just watching the ball. I'm not saying it gives you great insight but you get a shitload more than from the TV. I posted a couple of weeks ago about counting Mo's touches and stuff, you're always looking out for who is doing what and why, and constantly looking for changes in shape etc. It's why I bang on about Shaq's defensive qualities when most people think he's just a forward. He does more tracking back than people seem to know, he's properly box to box and works like mad off the ball. Keita for most of the season has jogged around in little circles showing zero tactical nous or even looking arsed to win the ball back.
Hopefully he thought he could just turn up and boss everything, but he's finally got his head round the fact that he isn't that great and needs to work