• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Torres gone. Scum gone to more scum

Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Its no bloody way to show young lads or players how to act......

When the going gets tough.... I wait til the last weekend of the January Transfer window and make myself look like a total spineless arsehole after 4 years of adulation.....

Did Torres ever mean any of those things he said? Did he ever enjoy those goals as much as we did?

God the thought he was not 100% part of it all saddens me to the core, not just cos I am a Liverpool Fan, but for those who idolise him as small kids......

Just imagine what they will think.....

Is anyone else not fucking worried about our club at the moment..... I thought we could claw everything back, but if he fucking leaves right now all the good work Kenny has done could come undone.....
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=43861.msg1267484#msg1267484 date=1296260310]
How come when you quote it only quotes the last quote not all the quotes?
[/quote]

We changed it.

I say we, I mean Sunny.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=43861.msg1267482#msg1267482 date=1296260268]
I'm broken-hearted.
[/quote]

Ditto
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Krump link=topic=43861.msg1267473#msg1267473 date=1296260081]
Only Pepe to go and then we're fully despanisherised. Didn't take long.
[/quote]

It's harder for a keeper to just up and leave. A goalkeepers first priority is to play regularly and be first choice, of course. He's got that here.
However, I'll be a bit worried if Man U buy Atletico's goalkeeper.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=43861.msg1267484#msg1267484 date=1296260310]
How come when you quote it only quotes the last quote not all the quotes?
[/quote]

Some new trick they are trying out cos people are morons and end up quoting like 15 quotes and it takes ages to get to the actual post (especially on phones appaz)
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=43861.msg1267484#msg1267484 date=1296260310]
How come when you quote it only quotes the last quote not all the quotes?
[/quote]

Wondering the same thing.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Bernowatson link=topic=43861.msg1267486#msg1267486 date=1296260341]
Its no bloody way to show young lads or players how to act......

When the going gets tough.... I wait til the last weekend of the January Transfer window and make myself look like a total spineless arsehole after 4 years of adulation.....

Did Torres ever mean any of those things he said? Did he ever enjoy those goals as much as we did?

God the thought he was not 100% part of it all saddens me to the core, not just cos I am a Liverpool Fan, but for those who idolise him as small kids......

Just imagine what they will think.....

Is anyone else not fucking worried about our club at the moment..... I thought we could claw everything back, but if he fucking leaves right now all the good work Kenny has done could come undone.....
[/quote]

No one is bigger than Liverpool Football Club.

You'd do well to remember that.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FoxForceFive link=topic=43861.msg1267487#msg1267487 date=1296260352]
We changed it.

I say we, I mean Sunny.
[/quote]

No likey
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

We should sell him to one club only. Real Madrid. Fuck him all the cunt deserved. To he loathed by all.

What was that Figo flag? 'we hate you so, because we loved you so'. Can see where they was coming from.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=43861.msg1267470#msg1267470 date=1296260039]
Yeah, unfortunately I don't think this is a money thing. It's because we aren't matching his ambitions.
[/quote]

His staying isn't matching the ambitions of his agents.

At one point are the players responsible? It's all very well saying, well in my professional life, I looked at it dispassionately and I decided to move sideways to another company that I found more promising, so why can't Torres do the same thing?

The thing is, while of course this is a profession, there are emotions involved in football, and fairly irrational loyalties. He decided to milk them when they were convenient, and draw from that mythology, and it benefited him personally and financially.

Now the very least he can do is eat shit for chasing money.

We did the very best we could this window, as far as I can tell, to reasonably strengthen the squad. We brought in a quality player who will immediately improve the first team. I don't think he could reasonably expect much more until the summer. He wasn't looking to be convinced.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

No, Wilko, you settle down.

You made a statement. Atlas disagreed (as did several others but, hey) and you get cranky.

Chill.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Wilko link=topic=43861.msg1267462#msg1267462 date=1296259899]
It's a pity our children don't have a genuine hero like we did at their age from 1977 onwards.
[/quote]Fucking right Wilko! Luke Skywalker would never leave the rebel alliance.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FoxForceFive link=topic=43861.msg1267487#msg1267487 date=1296260352]
We changed it.

I say we, I mean Sunny.
[/quote]

Not one of better changes, in my opinion.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=43861.msg1267495#msg1267495 date=1296260418]
No likey
[/quote]

In fact, while I'm in an arsey mood, it was the one thing that I liked on here. All other sites do that multi quote shite and I hate it so fuck this new system off. Please.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=43861.msg1267499#msg1267499 date=1296260483]
Fucking right Wilko! Luke Skywalker would never leave the rebel alliance.
[/quote]

Quite.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

I expected him to go in the summer but not in the last hours of the Jan transfer window..


Tw@t
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=FoxForceFive link=topic=43861.msg1267494#msg1267494 date=1296260410]
No one is bigger than Liverpool Football Club.

You'd do well to remember that.
[/quote]

I know I know,

But I dont know how much more of this shit I can take.....

When you suddenly think we turn a corner another stab wound comes to knock us back to the ground.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Wilko link=topic=43861.msg1267396#msg1267396 date=1296258465]
I seem to recall Vlad mentioning that Torres went straight for the tunnel after Wednesday's final whistle.
[/quote]

I did indeed Wilko. Shot straight down the tunnel without so much as a wave.

regards
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=43861.msg1267499#msg1267499 date=1296260483]
Fucking right Wilko! Luke Skywalker would never leave the rebel alliance.
[/quote]

He fucked off to Dagobah to get all hippie and "find" himself.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

I can't see him in a Chav strip, I just can't. My wee girl cried, on her birthday because of this. Fucking fuck.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Losing prize asset means Liverpool are left without partner for Luis Suárez

Tony Barrett
1 minute ago

By signing Luis Suárez for a club-record fee, Liverpool intended to do two things — give Fernando Torres the top-class strike partner he has been crying out for and prove to the Spain forward that their ambition matches his own.

The question now, after Torres informed Liverpool of his desire to leave Anfield yesterday, is whether they will appear in the same team.

Having wanted to leave Liverpool last summer only for his desire to be left unfulfilled by Chelsea’s inability to come up with the kind of offer that would tempt the Merseyside club to do business, Torres’s longing for a transfer has intensified during a season in which Liverpool have failed to live up to his and their aspirations.

The Torres camp has long seen Chelsea as the ideal destination for a player who has been coveted by Roman Abramovich for the past two seasons. Chelsea’s owner sees him as the key that can unlock the door to the Champions League success he craves. That is why the move for Torres has been made now; Abramovich wants to win the competition this season, before Chelsea’s ageing squad is broken up.

The other prime motive for Chelsea’s interest being hardened now is that Abramovich is hoping to avoid having to meet the £50 million release clause in Torres’s contract that will be activated at the end of the season if, as expected, Liverpool fail to qualify for the Champions League. There is also the small matter of Manchester City, Torres’s other long-time suitor, who would be ready to move in the summer and provide a challenge that Abramovich might not be able to match.

Torres’s yearning to leave is fuelled by a belief that Liverpool are not the same club as the one that he joined in July 2007. He feels that the damage done by Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jr, the former owners, will take several years or a spending spree unprecedented by Liverpool’s standards to make them competitive again.

The Spaniard also feels that he has been let down by a series of promises not being kept and saw this season as the final chance for Liverpool to live up to his expectations. Seventh place in the Barclays Premier League was not what he envisaged.

The Torres problem is one that was inherited by Fenway Sports Group (FSG), which has owned Liverpool only since October. It did not insert the clause in his contract — that was done by Christian Purslow, the club’s former managing director — nor did it spark the spiral of decline that has pushed Torres to the Anfield exit door. FSG has shown a mixture of ambition and prudence in conducting the Suárez deal.

But Torres was looking to FSG to go on the kind of recruitment drive during January that would convince him to stay, as John W. Henry II, Liverpool’s principal owner acknowledged when he admitted that certain players “would prefer a quick fixâ€. Henry will be particularly disappointed with Torres’s decision.

The move for Suárez for a fee that could rise to £22.8 million was intended to be a statement of FSG’s intent, an indication that they are ready and willing to compete at the top end of the transfer market.

But with Torres making clear his intention to leave and Chelsea’s interest in the World Cup winner intensifying despite their opening offer being rebuffed, it is likely that even a club record purchase might prove too little, too late for Liverpool to keep El Niño.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

Also, I agree with Ossi, I thought Fernando was one of the good guys.

Sad fucking day.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=43861.msg1267511#msg1267511 date=1296260674]
Suarz up front. A top notch winger, Charlie Adam, and maybe someone else, and we're better off.
[/quote]

Another marquee signing is needed. But we'll get raped for price.
 
Re: Torres - Chelsea 35mil Bid turned down

The quotes thing is way better IMO, the site was a fucking mare to read on a smartphone.
 
Back
Top Bottom