I have yet to see a thread these days which isn't destroyed within hours by Brendan or Mark with the same repetetive shite over and over again.
It sucks the life out of this place.
More likely the club are paying off the stand then Klopp not wanting to improve the squad. There will be some money available but certainly not enough to waste on players we are not fully convinced about. They said, it's obvious we should have done more in the summer.The owners gave him a big contract, 6 years which is probably why he seems not fussed in transfer market, very little urgency when the there are gaping holes.
More likely the club are paying off the stand then Klopp not wanting to improve the squad. There will be some money available but certainly not enough to waste on players we are not fully convinced about. They said, it's obvious we should have done more in the summer.
What would prefer? The usual mewling cabbages being wrong about everything and rolling out the same old litany of excuses?
Sometimes you have to just suck it up and address the obvious facts, and admit you were wrong
I would prefer if discussions about certain issues would be led in an objective manner instead of trying to hammer home points or insisting on being right no matter how wrong you are. It's Trump-esque at times.
It's a pity you don't get it.Why is the title called 'the push'
Loved Didi as a player but some of the stuff he says as a "pundit" isnt worthwhile to listen too.
He's only been here 18 months for fuck's sake. Fuck modern football.
I like the idea of taking more of a long-term approach and as such don't really have an issue with buying a bit of stability by giving a manger we trust a long-term deal. We've consistently risked our money on investments with a far lower chance of a pay off so it's not that much of a shocker.
The issue is whether the club is set up to support a long-term strategy and that ties in with the post made by @peekay - I remain unconvinced.
I'm very interested to see what we do in the summer because we need to start laying down some foundations long-term or not and this season has shown us that there is a lot of work to do in that regard.
I dont think we as a club have the necessary football infrastructure to support our managers.
Horribly poor scouting. For a billion dollar enterprise, I am surprised at how poor we are at identifying value for money players. I trust more people on SCM than our scouts. That is how bad things are. Every transfer window seems to be a deja vu - we need DM, goalkeepers, defenders etc.
I think most of our managers would have done well if they had stuck to the basics of their job "tactics and coaching the first team". Rafa, Houllier, King Kenny, Rodgers, and Klopp are all very good coaches. Problem is that whenever any manager takes over Liverpool, they go into Shankly mode. Spend 3-4 years replacing everyone from U10 coaches, diet of U 12 team, scouting, everything. There is a reason why there has been only one Bill Shankly and less than 5 similar personalities in entire football. Dont try to emulate him.
For example, one of the positive things Rafa did was hire Borrell and Segura. Why were they fired? Segura is now the Head of Academy at Barcelona and Borrell is now at Man City. Was their replacements significantly better than Segura and Borrell? Was the loss of continuity worth it?
Of course, there is a chicken and egg problem here. The managers might be getting involved because the support group is not that good. Why are they getting involved in player negotiations? Just focus on coaching the first team, let the scouts and youth team coaches keep supplying them with decentish to good players, and I think they all would be fine.
So are you agreeing with Hamann that he shouldn't have been given a 6 year contract extension because he's not been here long?
You are actually in an argument with someone in every one of the top 5 threads on this forum.
Don't you get tired? Cos we're getting tired of fucking reading it.