• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

The Premiership Winger - alive and kicking

Status
Not open for further replies.

manwithnoname

Bravo old man. Bravo.
Banned
There's been lots of chat and debate about wingers being something of an anachronism in the modern game, largely due to great players like Ronaldo creating a kind of "wide attacking striking" hybrid type of role, and versatility being the "must-have" attribute.

But let's take a look at the reality. Certainly Robben's display last night was a wonderful exhibition of attacking play from a wide position, and he seems to be as traditional a winger as you could hope for. Ribery is also a winger.

But the vanquished Mancs' two stand-out players last night were also wingers, Nani on the left and Valencia on the right.

Spurs' best player is Lennon. A winger.
Villa's is Young. A winger.
Johnson and Malouda have bothe been very good this season for their respective clubs. Both wingers.

Have we written off the modern-day winger too soon? Maybe.

Certainly I'd love to see a fast, tricky, skilful, goal-scoring attacking threat beating his man and skipping down the flanks at Liverpool.

And I don't much care what he's called.
 
no argument with any of that.
I think chung lee will be good for us and I still haven't given up on babel (yet).
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39720.msg1084512#msg1084512 date=1270719828]
There's been lots of chat and debate about wingers being something of an anachronism in the modern game, largely due to great players like Ronaldo creating a kind of "wide attacking striking" hybrid type of role, and versatility being the "must-have" attribute.

But let's take a look at the reality. Certainly Robben's display last night was a wonderful exhibition of attacking play from a wide position, and he seems to be as traditional a winger as you could hope for. Ribery is also a winger.

But the vanquished Mancs' two stand-out players last night were also wingers, Nani on the left and Valencia on the right.

Spurs' best player is Lennon. A winger.
Villa's is Young. A winger.
Johnson and Malouda have bothe been very good this season for their respective clubs. Both wingers.

Have we written off the modern-day winger too soon? Maybe.

Certainly I'd love to see a fast, tricky, skilful, goal-scoring attacking threat beating his man and skipping down the flanks at Liverpool.

And I don't much care what he's called.
[/quote]

Football is cyclic isn't it? It evolves too and we learn more about it and about systems etc. I think there's a lot of emphasis in the current game for the wide players to play between midfield and attack, to support more and to provide a healthy amount of goals and assists. Probably because of players like Ronaldo. The bench mark teams are what the rest aspire to be like.

I think our problem in recent years is that we've had players playing wide that provide a fair amount of goals (Riise, Kuyt, Berger, Murphy etc) but arguably don't provide as much in the way of creativity. Valencia is making a mockery of the notion that the trad winger is a thing of the past, he gets to the byline and puts in a great cross, but doesn't score that many goals - but it doesn't matter.

PS, I don't think Nani is a traditional winger.
 
I'd take any "fast, tricky, skilful, goal-scoring attacking threat beating his man" winger or not. It's been a long while since we've had a really skillful player. The closest we've got now is perhaps Purple, and possibly Pacheo. I would say most of us would love to see some flair in the side reminscent of past teams. What I'll give for a Barnes now, though Messi is acceptable too. 😉
 
PS, I don't think Nani is a traditional winger.

Why not? Starts wide, stays wide, beats players easily, creates goals, scores goals, is quite inconsistent. A true winger.

He must have 10 assists and 6 or 7 goals by now. Not amazingly great, but he seems to have improved his end product this season.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39720.msg1084522#msg1084522 date=1270720656]
PS, I don't think Nani is a traditional winger.

Why not? Starts wide, stays wide, beats players easily, creates goals, scores goals, is quite inconsistent. A true winger.

He must have 10 assists and 6 or 7 goals by now. Not amazingly great, but he seems to have improved his end product this season.


[/quote]

I don't know, maybe that's the point about labelling players. When he came in I expected him to be in the mould of Ronaldo, and that's probably stuck. He has been great this season though and looks to be living up to the initial promise.
 
It looked for all the world like he was going to get bombed out at the start of this year, but on the back of 3 good performances when Valencia was out and he played on the right he's earned a new 4 year deal and to be fair been pretty terrific ever since. If anything I think he's been asked to play a more traditional winger role this year and stop coming inside and shooting from 30 yards every single time he has the ball.
I fear he's another one who looked a dud who's going to be a top top player for them.
Valencia has been perfect since the day he arrived and can drop the ball on a 5p which is perfect for shrek.
Malouda too has been fucking magic this year.
It makes me sick it really does. I totally love wingers and have over defended ours again and again (pennant, nunez, gonzales, zenden, riera) because I just believe in a team with quality wide players and I just soooo want one JUST ONE of ours to succeed.
We suck at signing wingers. Fucking Heskey, Collymore, Kuyt and Cisse have provided more from our wing than any of our 'wingers' in the past 10 years.
I love wingers. I want our team to play TWO wingers. One attacking midfielder, one holding midfielder, one big 'number 9' and one creative genius! Is that too much to ask? Nb-Ryan I don't want an answer from you.
 
Two wingers? I'd be happy with one, in all honesty. As you say, we haven't had a proper winger in years. Since McManaman or Barnes, probably.

Btw, as much as I dislike Chelsea, I'm glad Malouda has finally come good because it justifies all my complimentary comments about him while he was at Lyon. All the strength and pace and goalscoring and intelligence that I raved about has finally shown itself. He's taken a long time to adapt to the PL, but for Chelsea it's been worth the wait.
 
to be fair to the wingers we've had down the years in the gh and rafa era they are in an overly defensive team, they are expected to singlehandidly rip teams apart but even the best wingers for the top clubs are supported by the fullback behind them and have players in support attacking as passing options and decoys and when they cross it isn't to a solitary player in the box. they're asked to do too much with too little support from their team mates.
 
[quote author=robinhood link=topic=39720.msg1084608#msg1084608 date=1270730089]
Not playing Kuyt on the wing would be a start.
[/quote]

And not replacing him with Benayoun would be a good number two....
 
[quote author=Insignificance link=topic=39720.msg1084621#msg1084621 date=1270731247]
[quote author=robinhood link=topic=39720.msg1084608#msg1084608 date=1270730089]
Not playing Kuyt on the wing would be a start.
[/quote]

And not replacing him with Benayoun would be a good number two....
[/quote]


Most definately.


As for wingers. Utd have bar and large always had wide players who could beat a man get to the byline and whip in a monster cross.

Even Becks while lacking pace was the scariest player on the pitch if had the ball at his feet out wide.

I can remember the last time we had a wide player that could do any of that :-\
 
I don't understand all the Benayoun hate. He shouldn't be permanent first choice, I agree, but he's better than Kuyt out wide.
 
[quote author=robinhood link=topic=39720.msg1084629#msg1084629 date=1270732054]
I don't understand all the Benayoun hate. He shouldn't be permanent first choice, I agree, but he's better than Kuyt out wide.
[/quote]

Hardly. he is miles better than Kuyt dancing his way inside, but he is useless to provide width by keeping his side, and treathen the fullback.
 
[quote author=robinhood link=topic=39720.msg1084634#msg1084634 date=1270732624]
Johnson can do that though, so I'm not really fussed.

My problem with Kuyt is the clumsiness
[/quote]

Johnson is a fullback. Its a different story. Imaging having a good winger supported by Johnson... Evra would have shit himself! And that has nothing to do about hatery towards Benayoun. A decent chap in shit form only!
 
What would I give to have Bayern Munich's wingers - I think Robben and Ribery are one of the best winger pairings in world football.
 
[quote author=Doped White Mouse link=topic=39720.msg1084653#msg1084653 date=1270733664]
What would I give to have Bayern Munich's wingers - I think Robben and Ribery are one of the best winger pairings in world football.
[/quote]

with them on the wings supported by johnson you could almost get away with the CM giving absolutely fuck all going forwards.
 
You don't need two out-and-out wingers anyway. Someone like Yossi on the right who can cut inside, pass forward, dribble and shoot, and someone in a more traditional wingery mould on the left who's fast and skilful, can surge (or trick their way) past their full-back, cross accurately and give width to the team... for me, that's the ideal.
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=39720.msg1084603#msg1084603 date=1270729123]
Two wingers? I'd be happy with one, in all honesty. As you say, we haven't had a proper winger in years. Since McManaman or Barnes, probably.

Btw, as much as I dislike Chelsea, I'm glad Malouda has finally come good because it justifies all my complimentary comments about him while he was at Lyon. All the strength and pace and goalscoring and intelligence that I raved about has finally shown itself. He's taken a long time to adapt to the PL, but for Chelsea it's been worth the wait.

[/quote]

Yep. A bit like Pires, he's taken a while to settle in, but he's showing world class form right now.
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=39720.msg1084655#msg1084655 date=1270733808]
You don't need two out-and-out wingers anyway. Someone like Yossi on the right who can cut inside, pass forward, dribble and shoot, and someone in a more traditional wingery mould on the left who's fast and skilful, can surge (or trick their way) past their full-back, cross accurately and give width to the team... for me, that's the ideal.
[/quote]

I think the long and the short of it is if we attacked as unit like everyone is asked to defend as a unit all the attacking players would look better as a result. too many gaps, not enough movement, erratic passing, all because we don't want to take risks and push further up the pitch.

if our attacking players didn't have ability you'd never see games like the real madrid 4-0, you mean to tell me the attacking players simply decided to 'attack more'? no, the TEAM pushed up and put madrid under pressure and because as a team we were further up the pitch we had better passing options. look at the pompy game, there was one touch passing which resulted in the babel shot that hit the bar. watch the video again and look how many liverpool players in and around the pompy penalty box, babel and aqua actually made a one two INSIDE the box.

I definately want to see pacey winger but pushing up the pitch will have the attacking players we already HAVE, sure we'll get caught on the break a few times but we'll create more chances which in turn will mean we will win more games. as a team from front to back we should have more balls and take more chances, not gung-hu football just a little more adventurous.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39720.msg1084606#msg1084606 date=1270729591]
to be fair to the wingers we've had down the years in the gh and rafa era they are in an overly defensive team, they are expected to singlehandidly rip teams apart but even the best wingers for the top clubs are supported by the fullback behind them and have players in support attacking as passing options and decoys and when they cross it isn't to a solitary player in the box. they're asked to do too much with too little support from their team mates.
[/quote]

That's a good point Spidey.
 
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=39720.msg1084603#msg1084603 date=1270729123]
Two wingers? I'd be happy with one, in all honesty. As you say, we haven't had a proper winger in years. Since McManaman or Barnes, probably.

Btw, as much as I dislike Chelsea, I'm glad Malouda has finally come good because it justifies all my complimentary comments about him while he was at Lyon. All the strength and pace and goalscoring and intelligence that I raved about has finally shown itself. He's taken a long time to adapt to the PL, but for Chelsea it's been worth the wait.

[/quote]

The annoying thing is that we had a deal in place for him before Chelsea stepped in late and trumped our offer. Whether Rafa (and us lot) would have given him 2 seasons to settle in is another matter.
 
Malouda has been really good for Chelsea this year. It surprises me every time I watch him play. I wonder what would've happened had we have signed him.

Anyways, I'd love to get a pacey winger for the left in the summer. I'm going to believe that this time we'll get one.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39720.msg1084512#msg1084512 date=1270719828]
There's been lots of chat and debate about wingers being something of an anachronism in the modern game, largely due to great players like Ronaldo creating a kind of "wide attacking striking" hybrid type of role, and versatility being the "must-have" attribute.

But let's take a look at the reality. Certainly Robben's display last night was a wonderful exhibition of attacking play from a wide position, and he seems to be as traditional a winger as you could hope for. Ribery is also a winger.

But the vanquished Mancs' two stand-out players last night were also wingers, Nani on the left and Valencia on the right.

Spurs' best player is Lennon. A winger.
Villa's is Young. A winger.
Johnson and Malouda have bothe been very good this season for their respective clubs. Both wingers.

Have we written off the modern-day winger too soon? Maybe.

Certainly I'd love to see a fast, tricky, skilful, goal-scoring attacking threat beating his man and skipping down the flanks at Liverpool.

And I don't much care what he's called.
[/quote]

Good post.

Interesting conversation the winger one.

Wingers have one of the toughest tasks in the game really. Along with strikers, they see the ball as little as any other position on the pitch. Yet they're not afforded the same leeway as a striker. They have to do something with it, create something, go past someone, or stretch things greatly in order to have an impact. Look at a defensive midfielder; if they hold the opposing attacking midfielder, and keep their own ball-use simple - that's job done. Central defenders; stop the forward from scoring, job done. Wingers are nearly always the first player replaced when it comes to substitutions, and if they don't fit into one of two categories; (1) fast, (2) skillful - then they're deemed no good.

There's a reason why we haven't had a good one since Barnes or McManaman; there aren't that many good ones out there. We've been linked to Simao for years, and even he's not all that. When David Bentley goes for 18M, you can see straight away the dearth of talent out there in that area. I don't even think Lennon's that fucking hot, but he's quick, and Capello loves him.

The Valencia example's a good one. He's not particularly skillful (certainly not like Nani), but he's direct, burtally quick, and has a pretty good cross. There was a great article from Richard Williams in the Guardian a month or two back comparing him to Stanley Matthews with his direct byline-approach tactic.

He's a rarity though. I can think of very few similar right-wingers. And he's fortunate to have Sir Alex's penchant for wingers there to relax him of the need to defend too. There's a reason the more solid Neville has been preferred of late than the youthful, exhuberant, and largely better Rafael.

I think he's rare though, because he goes on the outside. Given the formation of tactics these days, with attacking full-backs en vogue, a solid midfielder-cum-winger (Dirk for example) has been the preferred approach to negate the marauding runs from full-back. The next step has been to deply wingers on their non-prefeered (or non-natural side) - like Messi, Robben, Ribery, or closer to home - Babel.

Attacking that 10-15 yard traingular space in between centre-back, full-back and defensive midfielder has serious merit. Especially if you have midfielder runners arriving late, and an overlapping full-back as options. It beocmes even more dangerous if you have an attacking midfielder prepared to move completely out of the way, thus dragging the defensive midfielder with him. Like Aquilani did against Portsmouth. Or Park did for United at home to Milan.

I'm not really that bothered whether any (hopefully) incoming winger we might get is right or left footed, or prefers either side. I think with Masher, Lucas, Aqui, Dirk, Gerrard etc, we can compensate for someone quick and inconsistent. I like how Dirk's pushed across into a midfield three recently to free up Babel, but really Babel's not good enough in the long term. If we had a better version of him - a Di Maria or someone - then we'd be really flying.

But then, if you look at Rafa's history with wingers - Nunez, Kewell, Riera, Simao, Dirk, Aurelio, the lad at Bolton - I worry it might continue to be more of the same unfortunately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom