Spent £37m in the summer, had a 22% win rate under Adkins, bought one player in January who hasn't played, changed their manager and they have a 32% win rate under him. Looks like Pottechino has made a difference.
Southampton
- Thread starter Sheik Yerbouti
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
It's a fairly moderate difference though, but it's been enough. And if you factor that some of players brought in during the Summer have started to settle, it's difficult to see where one influence starts and another ends. He has given them a lift though and they're definitely playing more as a unit and a team. That guy we were linked with has looked better and better as the season has gone on.
Have a look at everyone's reactions to the sacking of Atkins: http://www.sixcrazyminutes.com/index.php?threads/nigel-adkins-sacked.27489/page-2
Sheik - most clubs improve in the first 6 months after appointing a new manager. It's a widely observed phenomenon, not necessarily to do with something the manager is doing himself. See our second half of the season when Kenny took over, and compare with the following season. Way too small a sample size to determine anything yet.
Sheik - most clubs improve in the first 6 months after appointing a new manager. It's a widely observed phenomenon, not necessarily to do with something the manager is doing himself. See our second half of the season when Kenny took over, and compare with the following season. Way too small a sample size to determine anything yet.
Well if we have a team of analysts buying the players then changing the 'coach' every 6 months shouldn't be a problem.
That isn't my view
Really? So you've realized you were wrong then?
It's a proven fact.
You should try to explain your ridiculous facts instead of being a gigantic cunt
Like Chelski then?
- Status