Very quickly in fact.
Really? On what do you base that prediction?
Very quickly in fact.
When we had Mane, Coutinho & Firmino together, at what rate was the team scoring goals?
If those front 3 combine for 45 goals, is it problematic if Firmino only scores 12 of them?
We can win the league with that front 3 ...
I'm responding to you as at least you have the ability to see what was happening before injuries and squad depth (i.e. forcing our best central player to the flanks) took away most of our momentum.
It is imperative next year we have another player like Mane - pace, technical skill & 8-15 goals. Cannot only rely on him.
You're looking at the results and performances in a window of half a season.
Assuming that level over a whole season could be maintained is total guesswork, even with injuries and absence taken into account
So it's a ludicrous assumption and one that has been shown to be flawed already
That doesn't alter the fact that Firmino isn't good enough to be our first choice striker, and doesn't score enough goals. He has many qualities, the much-vaunted workrate, the technical skill, etc. That is pretty clear.
But winning trophies requires pace, of which he has none, the ability to make the most of chances, which he can't, and a consistently high level of performance, which he hasn't.
Improving our defence, injecting more pace and a reliable finisher. Nobody would argue with those principles
What's ludicrous about anything I've said?
I was accused of overrating Mane's importance and quality, but if anything I underrated it
The rest hasn't changed. Nor has there been any evidence to suggest otherwise
We need a quality DM, more pace in attack, a better striker than Firmino, a new keeper and at least two more defenders
Improving our defence, injecting more pace and a reliable finisher. Nobody would argue with those principles
They didn't look dead on their feet to me, they just missed the opportunities when they came.
Brendan would've absolutely cherished to watch me on the pitch when I was younger.You are oddly fascinated by pace. I'm a total sucker for a bit of pace myself but your judgement on pace leaves a lot to be desired.
Frimino isn't as pacy as Mane for example but it doesn't mean he is slow.
Disclaimer : Please don't use this post as a launch pad to wade into match threads to try hammer home your point to illustrate Frimino has no pace at all.
Pace is utterly vital in any top team, and without Mane we look turgid.
Our win rate with him is over 70%
Without him it drops to around 30%. That might be partly due to his goal threat and finishing ability being missed, but his speed is also fundamental.
I've always believed a team with no pace is never going to win the premiership so I have to agree with manwithnoname. It was criminal that klopp didn't have another player with pace in the squad. We knew from the day we bought him that mane would be away on African nations duty. Pace makes a huge difference to your attack.
Wouldn't disagree with that generally but when there are 9 men sitting on the edge of their penalty area pace is not going to have much impactI've always believed a team with no pace is never going to win the premiership so I have to agree with manwithnoname. It was criminal that klopp didn't have another player with pace in the squad. We knew from the day we bought him that mane would be away on African nations duty. Pace makes a huge difference to your attack.[/QUOTE]
.
Amazes me that so many people are missing this.
I get that, but acceleration from a standing start is a different kinda pace which really can make a difference against a bus.Wouldn't disagree with that generally but when there are 9 men sitting on the edge of their penalty area pace is not going to have much impact
Really? On what do you base that prediction?
Pace is utterly vital in any top team, and without Mane we look turgid.
Our win rate with him is over 70%
Without him it drops to around 30%. That might be partly due to his goal threat and finishing ability being missed, but his speed is also fundamental.
I think you totally missed my point in posting that to Brendan.When he hasn't played as the main striker he's been poor, but when he has played as the main striker he's been a workhorse and important cog for the team, the flipside being he doesn't score enough goals. He's a wonderfully talented player but he hasn't been "great" all season at all and he doesn't provide a consistent goal threat. I wish people would stop taking that sort of criticism of him so personally, because it's so obviously fucking right.
As for Sturridge, you need to separate what he's like now to what we hoped he could still be like. We need a goalscorer, he was the best goalscorer at the club, so it was logical to want to see him play and see if he could get the goals we need. No one knew exactly how finished he was, so there's no room for gloating and "I told you so's", because the point is still blindingly relevant. We need more goals from whoever makes up the front three - the players who currently do, don't score enough goals. Ergo, we need to buy someone.
I saw that. Which makes the Burnley game seem like an early example of what January could be like.
well fuck him thenSüle signed for Bayern.
Why bother buying players now?
We're nearing the end of Jan and Mané will return in about 2 weeks, so what's the point?
We knew since the start of the season that we'd lose Mané in January, but Klopp or the club decided against buying anyone.
They dug their own grave.
We're not winning any title, Klopp should focus on who strengthening the squad in the summer.
Imo we should be looking at four players. Sule/Tah, Brandt and Goretzka. That's CB, CM/AM and RW/LW covered.
Then there's LB, DM and FW. Not sure who we should be looking for there.
Yeah it won't be cheap.
Selling Can and Sturridge might help.
Apparently there are no suitable players, or there are, but no one wants to sell them to us atm. Which is bull btw.But the season runs until May. And who knows what condition Mané will be in when he returns. If a suitable player is available then sign him now.
Burnley got a very early goal and sat back, two banks of five. Pace to exploit in behind wouldn't have helped that much. We needed ingenuity and guile to 'pick the lock' (hate to use a shit cliche, but feeling lazy). We were rubbish that day. I thought Matip missing was more of problem since our defense gifted them two goals which allowed them sit back for the rest of the game. We then failed to break them down in a poor game. Of course Mane would have increased our chances of scoring but I'm not sure we would have scored regardless.