No it isn't
Shelvey
- Thread starter TheBunnyman
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
No it isn't
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=42713.msg1216043#msg1216043 date=1289475910]
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216026#msg1216026 date=1289475185]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=42713.msg1216011#msg1216011 date=1289474524]
That list proves that Calavieri, SPearing and Poulsen are better than Babel 😉
[/quote]
Morse's MOTM table is the possibly the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season.
[/quote]
What? No it's not. You're off your head.
[/quote]
I think it is. In terms of their worth to the team this season, I pretty much agree 100% with the current list, and will probably agree with it at the end of the season.
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216026#msg1216026 date=1289475185]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=42713.msg1216011#msg1216011 date=1289474524]
That list proves that Calavieri, SPearing and Poulsen are better than Babel 😉
[/quote]
Morse's MOTM table is the possibly the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season.
[/quote]
What? No it's not. You're off your head.
[/quote]
I think it is. In terms of their worth to the team this season, I pretty much agree 100% with the current list, and will probably agree with it at the end of the season.
[quote author=Mamma Mia link=topic=42713.msg1216069#msg1216069 date=1289476903]
How did Lucas do last year in "the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season"?
[/quote]
I seem to recall he did pretty well....
How did Lucas do last year in "the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season"?
[/quote]
I seem to recall he did pretty well....
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216059#msg1216059 date=1289476569]
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=42713.msg1216043#msg1216043 date=1289475910]
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216026#msg1216026 date=1289475185]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=42713.msg1216011#msg1216011 date=1289474524]
That list proves that Calavieri, SPearing and Poulsen are better than Babel 😉
[/quote]
Morse's MOTM table is the possibly the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season.
[/quote]
What? No it's not. You're off your head.
[/quote]
I think it is. In terms of their worth to the team this season, I pretty much agree 100% with the current list, and will probably agree with it at the end of the season.
[/quote]
I like how you think the fact that you agree with it is some sort of recommendation.
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=42713.msg1216043#msg1216043 date=1289475910]
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216026#msg1216026 date=1289475185]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=42713.msg1216011#msg1216011 date=1289474524]
That list proves that Calavieri, SPearing and Poulsen are better than Babel 😉
[/quote]
Morse's MOTM table is the possibly the most accurate guide of assessing the contribution of a Liverpool player at the end of a season.
[/quote]
What? No it's not. You're off your head.
[/quote]
I think it is. In terms of their worth to the team this season, I pretty much agree 100% with the current list, and will probably agree with it at the end of the season.
[/quote]
I like how you think the fact that you agree with it is some sort of recommendation.
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42713.msg1216074#msg1216074 date=1289477331]
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool for judging a player's contribution over the course of the season.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool for judging a player's contribution over the course of the season.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216076#msg1216076 date=1289477490]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42713.msg1216074#msg1216074 date=1289477331]
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
[/quote]
No they weren't. Everyone assumed they were, because of Lucas' high placing. It just turns out that every other site seemed to think he was better than we did.
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42713.msg1216074#msg1216074 date=1289477331]
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
[/quote]
No they weren't. Everyone assumed they were, because of Lucas' high placing. It just turns out that every other site seemed to think he was better than we did.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=42713.msg1216045#msg1216045 date=1289476015]
No it isn't
[/quote]
I certainly don't think John Henry should hire him for the stat analyst role in the strategic team at any rate...
No it isn't
[/quote]
I certainly don't think John Henry should hire him for the stat analyst role in the strategic team at any rate...
[quote author=Asbo link=topic=42713.msg1216008#msg1216008 date=1289474488]
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
+ 100000
* 2
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
+ 100000
* 2
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=42713.msg1216077#msg1216077 date=1289477579]
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216076#msg1216076 date=1289477490]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42713.msg1216074#msg1216074 date=1289477331]
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
[/quote]
No they weren't. Everyone assumed they were, because of Lucas' high placing. It just turns out that every other site seemed to think he was better than we did.
[/quote]
*Forced to retreat now*
The reason I posted the table was primarily because I found it pretty amusing that Lucas was sitting at the foot of the table whereas Shelvey had picked up 2 MOTM's already.
I have made my point regard regarding them amply clear several times and it remains regardless. The table is of course NOT one of the reasons for such opinion.
[quote author=dmishra link=topic=42713.msg1216076#msg1216076 date=1289477490]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42713.msg1216074#msg1216074 date=1289477331]
I'm not sure why the mish is getting so much stick?
The table is obviously not an ideal barometer; but the results over the course of the season usually do suggest which players have done well.
I think the mistake is only in thinking that that table is a good way to determine who should play in any given match; whichshould be done by determining which players are better against the the next opposing team, not prior performances against different opponents.
[/quote]
It obviously isn't and it was never what I suggested. I believe it is an excellent indicative tool.
Okay, just had a look at last year's table and Lucas was 3rd- which would ruin any sort of credibility it has. But, I do believe RAWK was voting last year, and they're not this year?
[/quote]
No they weren't. Everyone assumed they were, because of Lucas' high placing. It just turns out that every other site seemed to think he was better than we did.
[/quote]
*Forced to retreat now*
The reason I posted the table was primarily because I found it pretty amusing that Lucas was sitting at the foot of the table whereas Shelvey had picked up 2 MOTM's already.
I have made my point regard regarding them amply clear several times and it remains regardless. The table is of course NOT one of the reasons for such opinion.
Shelvey lost possession once or twice but at least he was positive in his play. He played one lovely cross field ball to Torres at one stage. He isn't a right winger, nor is Meireles so I don't know Roy is persisting with playing them there.
Let's not forget Shelvey is 18 years of age and plays with maturity way beyond his years. No one could string three passes together last night so let's not single out Jonjo.
Let's not forget Shelvey is 18 years of age and plays with maturity way beyond his years. No one could string three passes together last night so let's not single out Jonjo.
[quote author=ILD link=topic=42713.msg1216087#msg1216087 date=1289478149]
Shelvey lost possession once or twice but at least he was positive in his play. He played one lovely cross field ball to Torres at one stage.
[/quote]
True, that was a very good pass. Xabi-esque, even.
Shelvey lost possession once or twice but at least he was positive in his play. He played one lovely cross field ball to Torres at one stage.
[/quote]
True, that was a very good pass. Xabi-esque, even.
[quote author=TheBunnyman link=topic=42713.msg1216167#msg1216167 date=1289488567]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=42713.msg1216087#msg1216087 date=1289478149]
Shelvey lost possession once or twice but at least he was positive in his play. He played one lovely cross field ball to Torres at one stage.
[/quote]
True, that was a very good pass. Xabi-esque, even.
[/quote]
He seems to have a lot of technical ability, an eye for a pass and great balance. He isn't a right winger and everyone struggled in that second half so let's not judge him after 45 mins.
[quote author=ILD link=topic=42713.msg1216087#msg1216087 date=1289478149]
Shelvey lost possession once or twice but at least he was positive in his play. He played one lovely cross field ball to Torres at one stage.
[/quote]
True, that was a very good pass. Xabi-esque, even.
[/quote]
He seems to have a lot of technical ability, an eye for a pass and great balance. He isn't a right winger and everyone struggled in that second half so let's not judge him after 45 mins.
[quote author=Asbo link=topic=42713.msg1216008#msg1216008 date=1289474488]
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
well, that was because we needed to hold a hig*
*stops himself*
*bites lip*
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
well, that was because we needed to hold a hig*
*stops himself*
*bites lip*
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42713.msg1216190#msg1216190 date=1289490790]
[quote author=Asbo link=topic=42713.msg1216008#msg1216008 date=1289474488]
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
well, that was because we needed to hold a hig*
*stops himself*
*bites lip*
[/quote]
Tongue, spidey. Tongue.
[quote author=Asbo link=topic=42713.msg1216008#msg1216008 date=1289474488]
The whole Midfield was shit, well more like none existant.
We just hoofed the ball from our penalty Area as far as we could, the 'midfield' just watched it sailing over thier heads!
Tactically we was utterly utterly CRAP
[/quote]
well, that was because we needed to hold a hig*
*stops himself*
*bites lip*
[/quote]
Tongue, spidey. Tongue.
Neil's really fallen on his feet there
If i was at the match in Anfield, i'd throw something at Roy Hodgson.
His insistance on even mentioning Poulsens name each time he talks about cm makes me fucking cringe.
You signed an over the hill, slow, sack of shit and paid millions for him. You and he are a fucking joke Roy.
The cunt is probably earning 50k a week to be a slower shitter version of Lucas and not play.
Fuck it makes me fume.
You signed an over the hill, slow, sack of shit and paid millions for him. You and he are a fucking joke Roy.
The cunt is probably earning 50k a week to be a slower shitter version of Lucas and not play.
Fuck it makes me fume.
may can't come soon enough...
S
Squiggles
Guest
Hahahaha
What a prick!
What a prick!
hahaha. Shelvey was better than Poulsen before we signed him from Charlton.
Actually, he was better than him whilst he was in the Scum youth team!
I'm almost past the point of getting angry with the horrible, useless, budgie-faced old cunt.
He's just pitiful.
He's just pitiful.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=42713.msg1238644#msg1238644 date=1293625608]
I'm almost past the point of getting angry with the horrible, useless, budgie-faced old cunt.
He's just pitiful.
[/quote]
where is there to go when you go past angry?
I'm almost past the point of getting angry with the horrible, useless, budgie-faced old cunt.
He's just pitiful.
[/quote]
where is there to go when you go past angry?
S
Squiggles
Guest
Despair.
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=42713.msg1238611#msg1238611 date=1293622981]
His insistance on even mentioning Poulsens name each time he talks about cm makes me fucking cringe.
You signed an over the hill, slow, sack of shit and paid millions for him. You and he are a fucking joke Roy.
The cunt is probably earning 50k a week to be a slower shitter version of Lucas and not play.
Fuck it makes me fume.
[/quote]
You know you called his signing a great piece of business....
His insistance on even mentioning Poulsens name each time he talks about cm makes me fucking cringe.
You signed an over the hill, slow, sack of shit and paid millions for him. You and he are a fucking joke Roy.
The cunt is probably earning 50k a week to be a slower shitter version of Lucas and not play.
Fuck it makes me fume.
[/quote]
You know you called his signing a great piece of business....
- Status
