• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Poll Shawcross on Reds' wish list

Prefix for Poll Threads

Who do you think we will end up with (if we do sign a CB)?


  • Total voters
    251
Status
Not open for further replies.

King Binny

Part of the Furniture
Honorary Member
Skysports.com understands Liverpool are targeting a move for Stoke defender Ryan Shawcross as they look to bolster their defensive options.

The Reds are drawing up a list of targets as they look to bring a new centre-half after losing Jamie Carragher to injury for three months and Shawcross is thought to figure highly on their wish-list.

Liverpool have held a long-term interest in the former Manchester United youngster and they have been keeping tabs on his progress at the Britannia Stadium.

Shawcross has established himself as one of the best young defenders in the country after catching the eye with the Potters over the last couple of seasons.

Reds boss Roy Hodgson has made a new central defender his top target in the January transfer window and he could move for Shawcross if the funds are available to bid for the 23-year-old.

Stoke would be reluctant to lose Shawcross with the imposing central defender having been made captain of Tony Pulis' side and they recently tied him down to a new deal until 2014.

Liverpool could decide to offer midfielder Lucas as part of any deal for Shawcross
in a bid to tempt Stoke to do business, with the Brazil international thought to be a target for Pulis in the last transfer window.

Who do you think we will sign, in the event that we really push for a CB signing? (I'm asking think cos I guess the 'others' option might well end up being the winner if its change to 'want' 😛)
 
Prioritising a centre-back when we've about 7 on our books? Fucking ridiculous.

How about a striker or someone for the left side?
 
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=43048.msg1228230#msg1228230 date=1291380528]
Prioritising a centre-back when we've about 7 on our books? Fucking ridiculous.

How about a striker or someone for the left side?
[/quote]

Yep
 
I agree with Buddha, but if we do end up signing someone like Shawcross or Cahill or Dann, I think it might be a good idea to send Danny Wilson to Stoke/Bolton/Birmingham on loan for the rest of the season to let the lad get some PL experience. Otherwise what was the point of signing him?
 
Buddha speaks the truth.

We've invested in Wilson. Kelly is a CB, who has had a brilliant season so far at RB. They should be given their chances. I mean, if not now then when?

A LW and a striker should be the priority. The CB issue can be sorted out in the summer.
 
We're linked with a different defender every day, not linked with so many offensive players.
 
urgh...

Defenders can vary significantly under different managers..

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.

how about some team building and tactics that suit what we have...
 
[quote author=gareth_thomas link=topic=43048.msg1228243#msg1228243 date=1291381770]
urgh...

Defenders can vary significantly under different managers..

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.

how about some team building and tactics that suit what we have...
[/quote]

Johnson can't defend. Konchesky is out of position all of the time. Skrtel always has a mistake in him. Agger is always injured. Carragher, though still our best by miles, is getting on a bit.

Compare that to ----Finnan------Carragher----Hyypia----Riise---

Our defence has progressively been getting worse for a while now, and tactics don't come into it.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228246#msg1228246 date=1291381983]
[quote author=gareth_thomas link=topic=43048.msg1228243#msg1228243 date=1291381770]
urgh...

Defenders can vary significantly under different managers..

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.

how about some team building and tactics that suit what we have...
[/quote]

Johnson can't defend. Konchesky is out of position all of the time. Skrtel always has a mistake in him. Agger is always injured. Carragher, though still our best by miles, is getting on a bit.

Compare that to ----Finnan------Carragher----Hyypia----Riise---

Our defence has progressively been getting worse for a while now, and tactics don't come into it.
[/quote]

Dont buy that at all.... Rafa found the perfect tactics for that back 4.........

i reckon Hodgson would decide to play a high line and have Finnan as the predominant attacking full back.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228246#msg1228246 date=1291381983]
[quote author=gareth_thomas link=topic=43048.msg1228243#msg1228243 date=1291381770]
urgh...

Defenders can vary significantly under different managers..

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.

how about some team building and tactics that suit what we have...
[/quote]

Johnson can't defend. Konchesky is out of position all of the time. Skrtel always has a mistake in him. Agger is always injured. Carragher, though still our best by miles, is getting on a bit.

Compare that to ----Finnan------Carragher----Hyypia----Riise---

Our defence has progressively been getting worse for a while now, and tactics don't come into it.
[/quote]

I agree with you there Squiggles. I think sorting out the defense should be high on the agenda. One quality central defender (Mertesacker please) would make a world of difference to our game. Left back is a problem as well but if Aurelio stays fit I think we can manage.

Johnson/Kelly---Mertesacker---Carra/Wilson/Kelly---Aurelio/Konchesky

That's not that bad any more. And so what if we have a million centre backs on our books, we'll sell a few. Agger and Skrtel could fetch a decent fee if we can find a right buyer.
 
[quote author=gareth_thomas link=topic=43048.msg1228255#msg1228255 date=1291382540]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228246#msg1228246 date=1291381983]
[quote author=gareth_thomas link=topic=43048.msg1228243#msg1228243 date=1291381770]
urgh...

Defenders can vary significantly under different managers..

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.

how about some team building and tactics that suit what we have...
[/quote]

Johnson can't defend. Konchesky is out of position all of the time. Skrtel always has a mistake in him. Agger is always injured. Carragher, though still our best by miles, is getting on a bit.

Compare that to ----Finnan------Carragher----Hyypia----Riise---

Our defence has progressively been getting worse for a while now, and tactics don't come into it.
[/quote]

Dont buy that at all.... Rafa found the perfect tactics for that back 4.........

i reckon Hodgson would decide to play a high line and have Finnan as the predominant attacking full back.
[/quote]

Are you kidding? Hyypiä and Carragher were one of the best, if not the best, central defenses in the world. They would have been solid with almost any tactic possible.
 
Yeah, a defence has nothing to do with the defensive ability of the players.

Top marks, Brains.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228276#msg1228276 date=1291384881]
Yeah, a defence has nothing to do with the defensive ability of the players.

Top marks, Brains.
[/quote]

well, seeing as you and others seem to be suggestig that the quality of the defenders went down under benitez, and given the fact that his defences consistently conceded fewer goals than the one he inherited, i'm not sure i'd be quite so cocky in your position.

all he's saying is that a manager has an important role to play in a defence's performance, and the stats bear that out.
 
Benitez played a more defensive midfield than his predecessor, and often played with two holding midfielders, which certainly a huge factor in it. He also played 4-5-1 far more often than Houllier.

I think it's unquestionable that Houllier bought a more talented and reliable defence.
 
oh yeah, right, 'houllier the cavalier' - i was forgetting myself.

houllier was even more safety-first than benitez - playing predominantly on the counter, pushing few men ahead of the ball, at times playing 4 centre-halves across the back 4. i agree that he bought better defenders than benitez - largely down to the one exceptional signing of hyypia - but he squeezed curiously meagre (or not so) results from them.

eg we conceded fewer last season than in the treble year of 2001.
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=43048.msg1228296#msg1228296 date=1291385913]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228276#msg1228276 date=1291384881]
Yeah, a defence has nothing to do with the defensive ability of the players.

Top marks, Brains.
[/quote]

well, seeing as you and others seem to be suggestig that the quality of the defenders went down under benitez, and given the fact that his defences consistently conceded fewer goals than the one he inherited, i'm not sure i'd be quite so cocky in your position.

all he's saying is that a manager has an important role to play in a defence's performance, and the stats bear that out.
[/quote]

Well he's going way over the top by his claims.

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.
 
[quote author=Akakabooto link=topic=43048.msg1228305#msg1228305 date=1291387102]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=43048.msg1228296#msg1228296 date=1291385913]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228276#msg1228276 date=1291384881]
Yeah, a defence has nothing to do with the defensive ability of the players.

Top marks, Brains.
[/quote]

well, seeing as you and others seem to be suggestig that the quality of the defenders went down under benitez, and given the fact that his defences consistently conceded fewer goals than the one he inherited, i'm not sure i'd be quite so cocky in your position.

all he's saying is that a manager has an important role to play in a defence's performance, and the stats bear that out.
[/quote]

Well he's going way over the top by his claims.

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.
[/quote]

well, and i'm only guessing here, but i'd say he wasn't being entirely serious there.
 
He is of course exaggerating but he seems to say that there's no point strengthening our defense because it would suck anyway. That is what I disagree with.
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=43048.msg1228303#msg1228303 date=1291386965]
oh yeah, right, 'houllier the cavalier' - i was forgetting myself.

houllier was even more safety-first than benitez - playing predominantly on the counter, pushing few men ahead of the ball, at times playing 4 centre-halves across the back 4. i agree that he bought better defenders than benitez - largely down to the one exceptional signing of hyypia - but he squeezed curiously meagre (or not so) results from them.

eg we conceded fewer last season than in the treble year of 2001.
[/quote]

I didn't suggest that Houllier was cavalier, just that a midfield of Kuyt, Xabi Alonso, Gerrard Macherano and Riera is stronger defensively, fitter, and worked harder than any Houllier midfield, which goes a long way to helping the defence. We pressed with a great intensity under Benitez and it was very difficult to play through us.

And defensive as it was, Houllier did play played 4-4-2 far more often than Benitez.
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=43048.msg1228306#msg1228306 date=1291387241]
[quote author=Akakabooto link=topic=43048.msg1228305#msg1228305 date=1291387102]
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=43048.msg1228296#msg1228296 date=1291385913]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=43048.msg1228276#msg1228276 date=1291384881]
Yeah, a defence has nothing to do with the defensive ability of the players.

Top marks, Brains.
[/quote]

well, seeing as you and others seem to be suggestig that the quality of the defenders went down under benitez, and given the fact that his defences consistently conceded fewer goals than the one he inherited, i'm not sure i'd be quite so cocky in your position.

all he's saying is that a manager has an important role to play in a defence's performance, and the stats bear that out.
[/quote]

Well he's going way over the top by his claims.

A defence of Maldini, Costacurta, Vidic, Thuram at their best would suck balls under our current management.
[/quote]

well, and i'm only guessing here, but i'd say he wasn't being entirely serious there.
[/quote]

gareth thomas?

he probably was.

Houillier had a better defence though; aside from Hyppia, we're forgetting that he also bought Henchoz,Hamaan and Riise.

Unfortunately he bought crap pretty much everywhere else, especially in midfield which is probably the main reason why Benitez's teams concede less.
 
Stoke City defender Ryan Shawcross is being watched by Juventus ahead of the January transfer window, according to Sky Sports Italia.

Shawcross has emerged as one of the finest young English centre-backs, and Manchester United and Liverpool have been credited with long-term interests. However, Juventus are rumoured to plotting a deal for the 23-year-old.

The Bianconeri are in need of defensive cover after an injury crisis has put extra pressure on Giorgio Chiellini and Leonardo Bonucci. Shawcross could be the man to come in after Juventus scouts have reportedly been at Stoke’s recent games.

However, the youngster wouldn’t come cheap and United and Liverpool have previously been linked with £17 million bids. Juventus may not be keen on matching this price after sporting director Beppe Marotta admitted that he wasn’t looking for big-money signings this January.
 
Hahaha yeah Juventus will go from having greats like Paolo Montero, Cannavaro, Zambrotta gracing their defence to the likes of Shawcross?

And if Stoke do sell Shawcross it will be for a highly inflated price as is the norm with English footballers.

What a joke it is when clubs like Sunderland and Stoke put 15M+ tags on Henderson and Shawcross.
 
Haha. You're right, roopy. That said, the 'standard' of Juve's rearguard has been on the down over the years. Legrottaglie is aging, re-signing Grosso only to find him a 'deteriorating' player (albeit his recent 'slight' return to form) and having to loan Motta and Traore to beef up the defence speaks about its quality.

The price inflation for British players and British market in general will continue for the foreseeable future I guess. Looking forward to the next Europa league game next week for Wilson and Kelly to prove their worth, again.
 
Shawcross is a good defender. I'm not sure if he's good enough for a crack at a top club but he's a good commanding presence. Like I've said a few times, he's always given Torres a game.
 
[quote author=Roopy link=topic=43048.msg1229890#msg1229890 date=1291691282]
Hahaha yeah Juventus will go from having greats like Paolo Montero, Cannavaro, Zambrotta gracing their defence to the likes of Shawcross Poulsen?

And if Stoke do sell Shawcross it will be for a highly inflated price as is the norm with English footballers.

What a joke it is when clubs like Sunderland and Stoke put 15M+ tags on Henderson and Shawcross.
[/quote]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom