Pellegrini signed him right? And won the league in his last season.
Selling our best player
- Thread starter Rosco
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
-
- Tags
- coutinho little cunt
- Status
Fair enough.
No he didn't
Nah, Pellegrini won the league in 13-14.
Sterling won the League Cup in his first season (Pellegrini's last).
Oh ok.
Ah there you go. I thought he had won something. I dont pay much attention these days.
Nope. But Danny Drinkwater has won one With Leicester since Sterling moved to City.
You forgot Raheem in that list...
10 years in which a certain midfielder 'played' for us.
Coincidence?
I think not.
The fucking Jonah.
Gerrard?
It's a wonder we managed to win anything with Gerrard and Carragher in the team
Actually I did....he was very weak in midfield and our results were inconsistent with him plus the other 3. I liked him for his creativity but against tough opponents he was a liability. Was happy to see him go but want a creative mid replacement that is much stronger. We were always gonna sell him and is the reason we bought OX to everyones confusion.
No that's not what he originally said. He said we should let them go to win things rather than keeping them and holding them back with us.
Of course I can understand why coutinho wanted to go. But that wasn't his point.
Isn't that the same thing?
Nope
One is understanding why they would want to leave
The other is actively saying they should leave
Well I never said that I actively want players to leave...
You'd rather just post that they should in every other match thread
Oh, I'd never say a great player should leave. What the fuck would any cunt say that for? We're not a fucking charity. They aren't my mates. Who cares?
"Oh poor old........*enter player name*.....we should let him fly free! To achieve all that he can in his beautiful life!
Go! Go with our blessing, you precious, wonderful man!"
So saying they "should" leave is not the same? Cunt off.
ok whatever.
You’ve found your new wonderman haven’t you.
We haven't sold our best player. Bit confused.
Klopp felt there was no point keeping hold of flyaway Phil. He was sulking and causing unrest. I've not read anywhere that he was allowed to leave to better himself, or words to that effect. I thought he was shipped out to get his whinging little shitface out of the club. Keeping him or letting him go - either way a gamble but I think one Klopp got right. Sackable offence? Maybe in Gagaland. Selling to fund VvD? Sure, the tin foil hat brigade with their lizard theory are perfectly entitled to their opinion but please don't post this shit as if it's established fact.
Agreed! No, it is only Modo who thinks catering to the personal ambitions of our players is more important than building the ambitions of our club.
No one's said it was fact?
People just believe it's plausible because every time we've broken our transfer record in recent memory, it's at the time we've just sold/about to sell for an extortionate amount
I'm sure at the time lots of people were saying he wasn't our best player?
I certainly didn't think he was and was hoping Mane and Lallana would step up and cover the gap.
I do hope we manage to keep some of our better players in the summer while adding to the squad with some top quality
I certainly didn't think he was and was hoping Mane and Lallana would step up and cover the gap.
I do hope we manage to keep some of our better players in the summer while adding to the squad with some top quality
I said other people were. Mane I think I said in the summer, Salah in January
- Status
