• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Scott Parker

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=43408.msg1242739#msg1242739 date=1294167471]
We could do a lot worse than signing Parker this window. Any sign of it?
[/quote]

Not heard anything, but there were plenty of rumours in the Summer. I'd take him.
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=43408.msg1242741#msg1242741 date=1294167706]
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=43408.msg1242739#msg1242739 date=1294167471]
We could do a lot worse than signing Parker this window. Any sign of it?
[/quote]

Not heard anything, but there were plenty of rumours in the Summer. I'd take him.
[/quote]

What fee would be fair for a 30year old? Would the owners sanction it?
 
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=43408.msg1242743#msg1242743 date=1294167802]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=43408.msg1242741#msg1242741 date=1294167706]
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=43408.msg1242739#msg1242739 date=1294167471]
We could do a lot worse than signing Parker this window. Any sign of it?
[/quote]

Not heard anything, but there were plenty of rumours in the Summer. I'd take him.
[/quote]

What fee would be fair for a 30year old? Would the owners sanction it?
[/quote]

Dunno, he's probably the Hammers best player. If we can get shut of Poulsen for near enough what we've paid, then £5/6m??
 
Hmmmm..

Charlton to Chelsea £10.5m age 24

Chelsea to Newcastle £6.5m age 25

Newcastle to West Ham £7m age 27
 
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=43408.msg1242756#msg1242756 date=1294168614]
He's not good enough for Liverpool, etc, etc...
[/quote]

I would take him ahead of Lucas and Poulsen for the rest of the season.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=43408.msg1242768#msg1242768 date=1294169476]
Good player, but we should have signed him 5 years ago.
[/quote]

is the correct logical answer
 
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=43408.msg1242767#msg1242767 date=1294169462]
He's fucking miles better than Poulson, Spearing, Lucas etc.
[/quote]

I agree whole-heartedly... I was mimicing the many who held that opinion when we were last linked with him.
 
Scott Parker is a decent player.

He's not really what we need in my opinion however. Another step sideways, not forward.
 
Describing him as better than the likes of Crapsen and Lucarse isn't really offering much of a definitive opinion, given that most players are.
 
We won't sign him. Nor should we, he's 30, has a bad injury record, and isn't international class.

He failed at the one big club he ever played for.
 
maybe we should just give poulsen another chance...


hahahahahahahahahaha!!!

seriously, who should be go for ?
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=43408.msg1242840#msg1242840 date=1294172847]
He's certainly no Lucas
[/quote]

Or Danny Guthrie.
 
Parker is WHU best player so he won't come cheap. He is better than what we have but doesn't fit the clubs new recruitment policy.

Unlikely to happen. Until we actually sign a few players, we won't know how serious the club is about sabermantics or whatever it is the call it.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=43408.msg1242851#msg1242851 date=1294173441]
Is he pretty close to Hayden Mullens?
[/quote]

He's barely better than Martin Broughton.

Sorry, Sir Martin Broughton.
 
Can we flog Poulsen? Or did he play for Juve before they laughed their cocks off that we were not only willing to take him off their hands, but happy to pay them £5M too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom