Kallis has a higher average then Tendulkar, but Tendulkar did quite a bit of damage to his average in the last two years.
In my opinion if you want to understand how good Tendulkar was, you have to look at Tendulkar's average in the 90s... Which is widely considered the bowlers era. He average more than 60. Him and Lara were out on their own, when the next best was Steve Waugh with an average in early 50s.
Kallis has a great average but much of his better performance with the bat came after 2002. He did not stand out from Ponting, Hussey , Hayden, Sangakkara, Jeyawardene, Dravid etc... Many batsmen managed to have 55 average.... Only Ponting managed to stand out from the gang. Between 2001 and 2009 Ponting average boggles the mind. Kallis never had a prolonged spell of utter dominance like Lara, Tendulkar and Ponting had.
In my opinion if you want to understand how good Tendulkar was, you have to look at Tendulkar's average in the 90s... Which is widely considered the bowlers era. He average more than 60. Him and Lara were out on their own, when the next best was Steve Waugh with an average in early 50s.
Kallis has a great average but much of his better performance with the bat came after 2002. He did not stand out from Ponting, Hussey , Hayden, Sangakkara, Jeyawardene, Dravid etc... Many batsmen managed to have 55 average.... Only Ponting managed to stand out from the gang. Between 2001 and 2009 Ponting average boggles the mind. Kallis never had a prolonged spell of utter dominance like Lara, Tendulkar and Ponting had.