• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Rodgers decided on all LFC signings - Ayre

Status
Not open for further replies.

Modo

A contentious scando
Member
Rodgers decided on all Liverpool signings - Ayre

By Eoin Ryan | Updated: Tuesday, 03 Nov 2015 13:26 | Comments
00056d58-642.jpg

Ian Ayre insists that the Liverpool manager has the final say on all Anfield transfers
Liverpool CEO Ian Ayre has played down the existence of a ‘transfer committee’ at the club and insists that former manager Brendan Rodgers always had the final say on players.

Rodgers’ recently appointed successor Jurgen Klopp has promised that he will have “the first word and the last word” on transfers but Ayre says that reports some signings were imposed on the Northern Irishman are off the mark.

“Brendan had the final say on all the players we signed,” Ayre told the Web Summit at the RDS in Dublin.

“There's only one person that has the final say over what players at Liverpool football club and that's Jurgen Klopp right now. That's always been the case for as long as I've been here.

“The words ‘transfer committee’ I think got used once and became this idea that we all sit round a table and have a vote on every player we sign. That couldn't be further from the truth.

“The point that has been made about the committee, and I don't think we did anything any different to most football clubs, is that the manager will say we are looking for somebody in this position and a bunch of people - a mix of traditional scouts and more recently analytical and digital-based information - bring all of that together as was always the case.

“Then we look at two, three, four players, the best players for that position, show them to the manager and the manager can go watch or have the scouts go watch those players and narrow it down. At that point I'll become more involved and start talking to clubs, agents, players on a negotiations basis and then the manager will choose.

“That's never changed. I've been at the football club eight years.

“The committee and we don't think of it as a committee, just the media do, is really a collaboration of all those people that all contribute to let the manager make that decision, and I think that's very smart."

Ayre also pointed out that the responsibilities of a Premier League manager means that they simply don’t have time to be involved in every part of the transfer process.

“Look at the last three months, we had a game every three days. When is the manager going to fly around the world and watch players? When is the manager going to negotiate with an agent?

“That's not the same as making the decision. The point is using smart processes and people, all of whom have all learnt at all manner of different football clubs and have great experience in the game. They are there to provide the manager with the best tools to make the best decision.”
 
Seems like it's not only the players that are playing the "blame game".
 
"“Then we look at two, three, four players, the best players for that position"

Right, let's look at that sentence again. Interesting. OK....

Even if Rodgers did have final say, I think that the compilation of ANY list of the "the best players for that position" in which AT LEAST ONE of those "best players" for that position included Adam Lallana, Dejan Lovren or Mario fucking Balotelli, is probably the result of a deeply flawed process at some point.
 
"“Then we look at two, three, four players, the best players for that position"

Right, let's look at that sentence again. Interesting. OK....

Even if Rodgers did have final say, I think that the compilation of ANY list of the "the best players for that position" in which AT LEAST ONE of those "best players" for that position included Adam Lallana, Dejan Lovren or Mario fucking Balotelli, is probably the result of a deeply flawed process at some point.

Well I remember that we at one point went, "hmmm...Mata or Downing?". The rest is history.
 
Here's a list of strikers, Brendan. Pick one:

"Balotelli, Eto'o, Mario Balotelli, Ancient Samuel Eto'o Who Is Allegedly 33 But Probably 49 Or Something, Balotelli, Mario Balotelli, BalotelliBalotelliBalotelliBalotelli"

Take your time. Don't take your time.
 
Here's a list of strikers, Brendan. Pick one:

"Balotelli, Eto'o, Mario Balotelli, Ancient Samuel Eto'o Who Is Allegedly 33 But Probably 49 Or Something, Balotelli, Mario Balotelli, BalotelliBalotelliBalotelliBalotelli"

Take your time. Don't take your time.

Sometimes you just need to say no.

Example:
Southampton geezer: OK, so we'll let you have Lallana for around £25 million.
A normal person: You can keep him. *Hangs up*

Now you could tell me that we desperately needed a striker, but in hindsight having no striker was better than having Balotelli.
 
Klopp has these players running a lot and getting results. Their confidence is slowly returning. They open the newspaper, and this fucking cunt is flapping his gums about who is to blame for buying them? I'd drag him into the dressing room and kick the shit out him. Then indefinitely sign him off work for medical reasons. The twat.
 
He's being sly with this remark: "the manager will say we are looking for somebody in this position". Now, the reality of the matter is that a manager will quite often ask not for a position but a particular player. Obviously, that player might not be available, but the manager will usually have one or two alternatives on his list. And this is where the committee becomes contentious, because in the past they've reacted to the initial list by saying, 'He's too old, his data isn't right...but, okay, we can see you want a right-sided midfielder, leave it with us...' And then a new list is compiled with players whom the manager either doesn't know or doesn't like. But he can choose. Big deal. Ayre is being economical with the truth here.
 
Definitely. It's an exercise in @rse-covering by an astute office politician and, like so many office politicians, he's a lot better at the intrigue that he is at his actual job.
 
Of course he did, imagine they suggested a player and Brendan said fuck off I'm not working with him but he was signed regardless, that wouldn't work now would it?

It wouldn't surprise me if most of the time we made a shortlist, Ayre contacted the relevant parties, got told where to go by most of these parties and we finally presented Brendan with the dregs as his options. That's not to say Brendan didn't get his way a lot, Allen, Borini etc but he also definitely had shite options handed to him like Mario.
 
Everyone now knows I was right all along about the transfers, so it's pointless Ayre wasting his time like this.

Even cloggycunt and IQ75 wouldn't bother contesting the matter now.
 
Whoever chooses the players, you can only sign players who are available.

The fact that only shit players are available doesn't change the fact that Rodgers had the final say.
If he didn't want to sign Balotelli, then he should have put his foot down and we wouldn't have.

It's just bullshit to think that the Committee went out of their way NOT to get players Rodgers wanted....
 
So if Rodgers signed them all, then he signed Firmino, Origi and even Lallana.

Adam Lallana who Barrett said didn't have a future under Rodgers in July, and then said was a clear Rodgers signing in August because he started the first game.

Diddums Peter, suck on that silver spoon.
 
Everyone now knows I was right all along about the transfers, so it's pointless Ayre wasting his time like this.

Even cloggycunt and IQ75 wouldn't bother contesting the matter now.

But isn't the 75 his date of birth?? Cause he is so wise an all.
 
Managers nearly always want a certain player, not someone to fill a certain position, and that's what Ayre knowingly overlooks. Take Clough signing Shilton: he wanted to rebuild the spine of that Forest team and he only wanted the best. He wanted the best keeper around. Imagine if there'd been a committee that said, 'Okay, Brian, we get it. Shilton's 28 already, and his club is demanding we break the transfer record for him, so he's out, but we'll look for a younger, cheaper version. That'll be okay, eh?' It's nonsense. No manager has built a great side by pointing to positions and asking for them to be filled - they've always gone for individuals, individuals they've chosen. For all the supposed attention to detail of the committee, detail is precisely what it fails at.
 
I think you might find if you bother to look closely, I've been on this site since 2008. So whoever you may want to accuse me of being, please stop. You have chased away too many a good poster on here and how you are a mod is criminal.
 
a) it's not Mr. Moo - though he can post when he wants (he's not banned)
b) being a mod is better than sex with a gorilla. I know.
 
a) it's not Mr. Moo - though he can post when he wants (he's not banned)
b) being a mod is better than sex with a gorilla. I know.

Ok, so it's some other WUM using an alias account. *shrugs*

Anyway, who have I driven away? Moo and MrJohn? WOW, the site's a much worse place.
 
Ok, so it's some other WUM using an alias account. *shrugs*

Anyway, who have I driven away? Moo and MrJohn? WOW, the site's a much worse place.

Wow, you are such a fool! There are a few wums on here mark, many are gone as you've pointed out, but fuck me you are the biggest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom