• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Rick Parry received huge Liverpool FC pay-off

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jürgen4PM

Well-Known
Member
Rick Parry received huge Liverpool FC pay-off
May 7 2010 by Dominic King, Liverpool Echo

LIVERPOOL dipped further into the red last year as their interest payments rose from £36.5m to £40.1m – as it emerged ex chief executive Rick Parry received a severance deal of more than £4m.

The annual financial results for Kop Football (Holdings) Limited were published today and revealed that the club made £4.33m in termination payments to “the former chief executive... and coaching staff following a restructure of the Academyâ€.

It is understood to be one of the biggest pay-offs ever to a sports administrator, dwarfing the £1.2m Liverpool-born Brian Barwick received when he left the Football Association in 2008 and Keith Edelman’s £1.5m pay-off from Arsenal in the same year.

Parry, who became Liverpool’s chief executive in July 1998, announced he was quitting Liverpool in February 2009 after enduring difficulties in his relationships with both Rafa Benitez and co-owner Tom Hicks.

Dallas based Hicks at one stage publicly humiliated the Ellesmere Port born Anfield supremo, labelling him “a disaster.â€

Liverpool made a pre-tax loss of £54.9m in the year to July 31, 2009, up £14m from 2008, a significant chunk of that figure being the crippling interest payments.

Turnover increased over the 12 months by more than £20m to £184.8m, a total largely attributed to increases in television revenue.

Meanwhile, operating profit – nothing to do with player sales, tax and interest – has increased by 10 per cent to £27.4m.

The information is a season old and does not include any of the figures from the record-breaking sponsorship deal that was struck with Standard Chartered.

One significant revelation, however, is the fact the club’s commercial and administrative team increased by nearly half to 275 full-time employees.

Commercial revenues, which include merchandise and sponsorship, grew by £13.5m to £67.7m.Included in this is a trebling in overseas revenues and highlights the work of Commercial Director Ian Ayre, who was made a director of the club last December.

As last year, The auditors – KPMG – have said that Kop Football (Holdings “is dependent upon short term facility extensions.

“These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the group’s and parent company’s ability to continue as a going concern.â€

This once again highlights the need for significant investment or a full sale that would see Hicks and George Gillett finally leave Anfield.
 
So taking into account our new sponsorship/TV deals, we'd probably be turning a small profit if the 2 cunts hadn't lumbered us with interest payments of £40.1m?
 
How can it be that performing so badly at your job can lead to a £4 million pound pay off?
 
wonder is it will ever come out if he did in fact recommend moores go with the yanks rather than take the offer on the table from the DIC.
 
The version I heard was that he did it because he knew DIC didn't rate him and he'd be a goner if they got in. If that's true, it's ironic how things turned out.
 
His contract entitled him to a two year notice period, i.e. a two year salary for being given the bullet in this instance.

How much did he earn ? I don't think it was 2m quid a year.
 
"former chief exec............ and coaching staff". So it is clearly not just Krustys' wages. I would imagine he was on a million a year though.
 
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=40129.msg1100917#msg1100917 date=1273226133]
So taking into account our new sponsorship/TV deals, we'd probably be turning a small profit if the 2 cunts hadn't lumbered us with interest payments of £40.1m?
[/quote]
Which for any football in this day and age is impressive if you exclude Arsenal's profit from last year but they do have a massive stadium. So do most now agree the Americans are now not a good idea then, reason I ask is last year there were quiet a few sympathisers of their regime, just wondering...
 
£55m loss for 2009 - More Financial Woe

Liverpool's parent company posted a huge loss of £54.9m for the year ended on 31 July 2009 as debt interest payments and severance costs hit hard.

The loss was 34% worse than 2008's figure as £40.1m went on servicing the club's £351.4m debt to Royal Bank of Scotland and US firm Wachovia.

Pay-offs to senior staff, including former chief executive Rick Parry, accounted for a further £4.3m.

BBC Sport understands that Parry's severance package was £3m.



Disgraceful... YANKS OUT NOW!!
 
Re: £55m loss for 2009 - More Financial Woe

Please, for the love of God, let it all stop. NOWWWWWWWWW !!!!
 
[quote author=rubans link=topic=40129.msg1100971#msg1100971 date=1273230156]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=40129.msg1100917#msg1100917 date=1273226133]
So taking into account our new sponsorship/TV deals, we'd probably be turning a small profit if the 2 cunts hadn't lumbered us with interest payments of £40.1m?
[/quote]
Which for any football in this day and age is impressive if you exclude Arsenal's profit from last year but they do have a massive stadium.
[/quote]

Arsenal's profits will be significantly lower this year and next, as most of last years profit came from the sale of property on the Highbury site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom