So a purely hypothetical scenario.
There's an ISIS terrorist in your country, on the basis of a connection to a national of your country. The state discover its fraudulent and decide he can fuck off back where he came from. He says he might get tortured there.
Amnesty International are pleading for you to allow him to remain. The European Court of Human Rights are concerned you might be infringing his human rights.
Should his Human Rights take precedence over national security ?
There's an ISIS terrorist in your country, on the basis of a connection to a national of your country. The state discover its fraudulent and decide he can fuck off back where he came from. He says he might get tortured there.
Amnesty International are pleading for you to allow him to remain. The European Court of Human Rights are concerned you might be infringing his human rights.
Should his Human Rights take precedence over national security ?
