I think one of the Sky Sports personnels said he will only be subjected to a 1 match ban because the red is not for violent conduct.When will we know the number of games vandyke will miss?
I think one of the Sky Sports personnels said he will only be subjected to a 1 match ban because the red is not for violent conduct.When will we know the number of games vandyke will miss?
AmendedOne more loss and he'll be called into the Saudi consulate for a meeting and finish up at the bottom of the Tyne.
I think he had to do those substitutions. Once we went to a flat back 4, Gordon was no longer as effective.I do wonder how far Howe can take them. His subs changed the game for them, as they started to cede more and more control
I think one of the Sky Sports personnels said he will only be subjected to a 1 match ban because the red is not for violent conduct.
3 atm
I did worry that he was making a bad situation worse by not leaving the pitch. Players are seemingly still not used to the fact they can’t have a go at officials as they used to.pretty sure he was sent off for denying a goal scoring opportunity which carries a one match ban. Three is for violent conduct and two for dissent.
if the match ref raises Virge’s refusal to leave the field of play after the sending off then additional games could be added.
So 1 atm
They did.Subs were the game changers. Biggest one was Tonali going off and longstaff coming on. Massive downgrade and relieved a lot of pressure.
Having said that why the hell they didn’t just pump the ball to Gordon for 1 on 1 with Trent is beyond me.
Yep. It's fine to stick around while the VAR check goes on, and I'd even suggest a player should, calmly, make their case to the ref while they're waiting because if he does review it on screen that might help steer his final decision. But VVD mouthed off at him when he eventually walked off and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get an extra game ban for that. Passions and all that, but he should know better.I did worry that he was making a bad situation worse by not leaving the pitch. Players are seemingly still not used to the fact they can’t have a go at officials as they used to.
As captain I would assume he had the right to question the decision?Knowing us they'll add a game because he had a go a the ref and 4th official.
As captain I would assume he had the right to question the decision?
My memory was that there were a few cross field passes that Trent / Joel cut out easily and then a few runs from Gordon where he cut inside rather than go down the line.They did.
My bad, thought straight red was instant 3 games.pretty sure he was sent off for denying a goal scoring opportunity which carries a one match ban. Three is for violent conduct and two for dissent.
if the match ref raises Virge’s refusal to leave the field of play after the sending off then additional games could be added.
So 1 atm
Gordon is one trick speed merchant. My recollection of the match is that Trent wised up to this and frequently forced him to cut back inside where Matip easily moped up.My memory was that there were a few cross field passes that Trent / Joel cut out easily and then a few runs from Gordon where he cut inside rather than go down the line.
On the few occasions he did attack down the wing Trent was very disciplined and stood off him allowing him to cross.I was relieved Gordon didn’t try to take Trent on more.
Must be some kind of PL record9 red cards in 29 games so far this season.
It was a red. He went through the player to get the ball.Despite nearly everyone saying it was a straight red, I don't get it. People saying we'd have wanted a red it it was the other way round, no I wouldn't. He didn't try to foul him and he wasn't through on goal. It wasn't a red.
It was a red. He went through the player to get the ball.
He was last man, Isak was denied the opportunity to control the ball. If the touch was good, he was through on goal.
I hated it in the heat of the moment. But looking at it from a few different angles the ref got it right.
That being said. If the ref had given a yellow, I'm not sure VAR would have said it was clear and obvious he got it wrong either.
Brooks is a bad ref (well vast majority are), but he got that one just about right for me.
Nunez is Uruguayan and Ali is Brazilian so I thought they both spoken a version of PortugueseDidn't realize Nunez and Alli understand each other's language.
Nunez is Uruguayan and Ali is Brazilian so I thought they both spoken a version of Portuguese
So I looked it up, and actually they speak Spanish...
But here's what it said......
"Spanish is spoken throughout Uruguay, although in Rivera and other borderland towns close to Brazil an admixture of Portuguese and Spanish can be heard, often in a slang called portuñol, from the words português and español."
Thanks 😉I think it's more to do with how close the languages are. In Brazil they also get Spanish language TV, Spanish language music etc.
Nunez spent a few seasons in Portugal so he's used to the language although he isn't fluent.
It's like Norwegian and Swedish or Danish and Swedish. Although as I Sweden I can't speak Norwegian or Danish, I can understand the gist of what they're saying.
Norwegian 90%, Danish 60-70%.