• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Other games 15 - 18 Sep

Status
Not open for further replies.
Moyes team are a counter attacking team and very good at it so far but problem is soon as they are down against a decent team especially one as good as City, will be a struggle to get back in.
 
City are unstoppable.
If we're gonna have any chance of winning the league we have to perform like last time we did it and basically win every game
Can't trust anyone to beat them
 
Kulusevski continuing his good form. Will he be a viable option as Salah's replacement?

Before today's game:

[article]
Most distance covered in the Premier League this season

Most distance covered (km)
----
Dejan Kulusevski: 47.07
Bruno Fernandes: 46.84
Declan Rice: 46.75
Abdoulaye Doucoure: 46.43
Rodri: 46.37

Most distance covered in one match (km)
----
Dejan Kulusevski: 13 vs Bournemouth
Bernardo Silva: 12.57 vs Burnley
Rodri: 12.48 vs Newcastle United
Phil Foden: 12.45 vs Newcastle United
Billy Gilmour: 12.34 vs Wolves
[/article]
 
Angeball indeed.

Fucking hell between our game, Spurs and Villa there were like 7 goals in the 5 mins + stoppage time.
 
Corruption mate, Sheffield had them beat but all the refs conspired to allow 20mins added time for Spurs to get 2 goals.

It is what it is.

I didn't watch the game, I'm not sure if you did. But from what I can understand, there was a lot of time-wasting.

In this case it is annoying. I despise Spurs. However, it's very frustrating if your team is losing and the opposition are doing whatever they can to run the clock down. We've all been there.

So unlike a lot of rule changes, making the time added on more accurate is actually a pretty good one.
 
You were saying?

Also, Palace were robbed, never a penalty
Haven’t seen the incident but
I listened to Trevor Sinclair’s claiming that it wasn’t and immediately thought it must have been because he also slyly referred to Liverpool fans and van Dijk.
 
Looked like a pen for me, Ref took a while to give it and had to overule his onfield decision. AV were better than Palace, Palace didn't deserve the lead from what I saw.
 
Haven’t seen the incident but
I listened to Trevor Sinclair’s claiming that it wasn’t and immediately thought it must have been because he also slyly referred to Liverpool fans and van Dijk.
Probably one of those where if it was or wasn't, you'll still get people talking about it and berating the refs....sometimes they can never win.

Is it right the ref awarded it initially but was called over to VAR but stuck to his original onfield call?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom