In hockey you see this. The fact that Sterling dove doesnt negate the fact that Lloris fouled him.
Other Games - 1/2 Feb
- Thread starter got red on me
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
In hockey you see this. The fact that Sterling dove doesnt negate the fact that Lloris fouled him.
Oh I agree that sometimes it makes perfect sense, but sadly football is so very closed minded that if that happened I'm not sure anyone would be pleased. Every pundits head would explode.
Tbf he's been under loads of pressure for each one I remember, the defenders are really getting on them.
Fair to say he should have scored at least one of the very good chances he's had.
He’s clearly in on it!
Just curious. Does the fact that the ball is clearly going away from goal and most likely out affect the decision to not give a penalty?
LoL
Really serious foul play. Can't understand that some on Bluefume even mention it in same bracket as the Robbo incident. Zhinsenkos incident was more like Robbos
Reason enough to hope this happens someday!
I think knocking it so far ahead you're never getting it does come into the decision sometimes
It would presumably play into the decision but not sure it was far enough away that Sterling couldn't get there.
I didn't mean the deflection from Loris. I meant Raheem does knock it out even further right? Even if Loris does not touch Raheem, there was very little chance of Raheem getting to the ball he knocked out. I was wondering if that factors into the decision.
Fucking boss this game. City carve them open over & over, mad defending, but even more mad final pass & shot decisions.
Meanwhile spurs keep very occasionally breaking & city's defence shit themselves when they do.
It's all very entertaining.
Meanwhile spurs keep very occasionally breaking & city's defence shit themselves when they do.
It's all very entertaining.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Disgraceful foul from Raheem Sterling on Dele Alli. Imagine if this was Salah or any other Liverpool player, you’d never hear the end of it. <a href="https://t.co/UfymSmLWq4">pic.twitter.com/UfymSmLWq4</a></p>— JP (@JurgenPressed) <a href="">February 2, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Agree. I was thinking to switch to NHL at 5.30 but the way this game exploded I want to see what can happen here. But a City goal will kill it. Can't see this Spurs team having an equalizer in them
Agree with that. If city score I think they'll be much less expansive & spurs won't have the room to break with it, if it stays nil nil then spurs have more chance of scoring for sure.
They were worse. This is spurs letting city have the ball, & trying to do what Mourinho sides do best, press just enough to force a mistake. Thing is they're not that good at it, so they're reliant on city making an unforced error, which is rare.
Hahahaha.
Tactical fouls come home to roost.
Tactical fouls come home to roost.
Thing is if he have just ran alongside him & they'd have tangled up & gone down, & doubt the ref would have given it.
Very sloppy defending, much better ways to handle that
Very sloppy defending, much better ways to handle that
- Status
