It's the red dye that pushes unit costs up
Nike Sources.
- Thread starter Ijg
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Whys that then? I'd wager we sell more shirts globally than psg and a thing called economies of scale probably suggests they make our shirts cheaper as a result and subsequently make more money per shirt sold , supply and demand etc etc etc
I honestly thought Nike were paying £45m to PSG a year turns out its €80m
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/par...81/psg-seal-record-80m-per-year-nike-kit-deal
So the margins are likely to be the same. I am not sure the increase in LFC shirt sales would mitigate the losses on PSG shirt sales. PSG, are probably the biggest club in the French-speaking world
Shirt sales are not the only consideration when it comes to iconic sporting superstars.
When you put it like that it is hard to disagree....
Other than the fact, PSG don' need to sell him and don't want to sell him. And if Mbappe was available, Real, Man United, Barca, Man City could blow us out of the water
They don’t have Nike backing them, putting in 200m towards his purchase. Keep up.
Doesn't fit with the original story.
They dont need to sell neymar nor do they want to but the player is having a funny impact on the way things go
He's about as sharp as a sphere made from sponge.
We're not signing Mbappe, end of. There's more of a chance that Man U would be relegated
That will also happen season 22/23 when Mbappe scores a trick against them last game of the season, to take his tally to 53 goals in all competitions and the league title
PSG isn't associated with competitiveness internationally (or even football for that matter).
It's associated with everything chic and cool and fashionable, that's the PSG brand that Nike craves.
The PSG brand is so big they put a fucking basketball player on their kit.
Can't say I'd be a massive fan like
Mongs shouldn’t be allowed access to photoshop.
But then we wouldn't have indykaila out a plane waving at VVD
Perhaps I’m being alarmist, but I wonder if Klopp’s recent hints about wanting to “retire” after the expiration of his contract in 2022 and having “no interest” to renew is connected to the Nike thing. He’s made it clear he won’t tolerate a sponsor having a say in transfer policy in any way, shape or form - maybe the pressure to do otherwise is souring his relationship with FSG?
It’s got nothing to do with it. Klopp has left former clubs when he feels its right.
Let's be honest, we'll sign neither.
His tweets will flash back before his eyes
Have you seen the price of the official baseball shirts? Just a few sales explains that difference.
Answers from the internet:
MLB's ownership stakes in MLB Advanced Media (100%), BamTech (15%) and MLB Network (67%), as well as the league's investment portfolio, are equally divided among the 30 teams, constituting over $400 million in value per franchise
After MLB sold the Washington Nationals–which the league had acquired in 2002 for $120 million–to the Lerner family for $450 million in 2006, the profits from the sale were parked in Baseball Endowment L.P. (BELP), of which each of the 29 teams that had owned the Expos had an equal share
sponsorship dollars/income for the redsox may be higher as well, methinks.
They play at least 162 games a year. TV revenue, sponsors, tickets, etc. Of course, MLB attendance has been diminishing but still - 162 games for one of the big teams means big money.
- Status
