Baker Mayfield was a walk on twice! Incredible story - wonder how things will go for him there!
Hes better than that though. He barely played last year and didnt play at all the previous year. He can be a go to guyYou fleeced the raiders imo ... fleeced them ... a 3rd rounder? He's never even got 50 catches in a season ... 3rd round you can get a Gallup or a Washington - who are as talented.
OY - give me credit, I said it a few posts before him! 🙂
I'm very disappointed Jerry didn't trade up with Baltimore to get James ... That was a monster cock up UNLESS we're going to be trading a 2nd or 3rd for Earl Thomas.
I know I know, we needed a LB and Vander Esch could be good (assuming the neck condition isn't as serious as some teams said it is) but James was the best S in the draft and we've not had a 'great one' since Darren Woodson ...
Hes better than that though. He barely played last year and didnt play at all the previous year. He can be a go to guy
Oh, and worst pick of the draft so far? Kolton Miller! (RaiDUHS)
I thought the below would get drafted in the 1st round:
Landry
Daniels
Hurst
Hurst went at 25 to Ravens didnt he?
Hurst was expected to fall due to his medical.Michigan DT/DE ... not the TE.
Hurst was defo the best TE though - but I am surprised he went that high ... they could have probably got him in the 2nd (or Goedert/Gesicki).
Hurst was expected to fall due to his medical.
It seems like the Browns fucked up on draft planning.
The Broncos, Bears and Jets must be laughing.
Would it be terribly surprising if Jackson turns out to be the best QB in this draft ?
I heard someone question whether this draft is like the 2011 one - where is you didn't take a QB in the first round you inevitably got a superstar
I thought about that. However i'm not so sure it was a fuck up now.It seems like the Browns fucked up on draft planning.
The Broncos, Bears and Jets must be laughing.
Would it be terribly surprising if Jackson turns out to be the best QB in this draft ?
I heard someone question whether this draft is like the 2011 one - where is you didn't take a QB in the first round you inevitably got a superstar
It was cleared by two other facilties however you know how it works. One red flag and it all comes crashing down. See concerns on Vander Esch even tho he was cleared too.Yup, but that was cleared I thought.
I thought about that. However i'm not so sure it was a fuck up now.
If, and its a very big if. They thought that Mayfield was head and shoulders above the rest of the QB class. Then they had to go for him at #1. Since all signals from Jets camp was they would take Mayfield. Whether the jets would have or not is another matter, but the browns couldn't take that risk if they thought he was by far the #1 to fit there system.
They sorely need both CBs and Ss therefore Ward does fit as overall scores regardless of position he was top 5.
Chubb a year after Garrett would be going all in on two rookies. Broncos have a Vet in Miller to protect Chubb.
I do think they should have taken Barkley. Look at Cowboys who took Dak and Elliot. Having a franchise RB who can also catch would have taken the heat off any of the QBs to develop into however the team wanted. Hyde isn't that kind of RB. But they obviously had a clear plan B if Barkley was snapped up.
If that was to be redraft now..
#1 Newton
#2 Miller
#3 J Jones
#4 JJ Watt
If we dont do a trade, what do you expect at 50? Sutton, Miller? Surely it will be a WR
The only slight I read on him was his wonderlic score. I have no idea how that works though ...
Is that the IQ test ?
Well you'd obviously want a smart QB but whether Wonderlic is indicative of football smartness is surely a question ?
I'm sure someone has tried to figure that out
I dont think they can style that fuck up out man.I thought about that. However i'm not so sure it was a fuck up now.
If, and its a very big if. They thought that Mayfield was head and shoulders above the rest of the QB class. Then they had to go for him at #1. Since all signals from Jets camp was they would take Mayfield. Whether the jets would have or not is another matter, but the browns couldn't take that risk if they thought he was by far the #1 to fit there system.
They sorely need both CBs and Ss therefore Ward does fit as overall scores regardless of position he was top 5.
Chubb a year after Garrett would be going all in on two rookies. Broncos have a Vet in Miller to protect Chubb.
I do think they should have taken Barkley. Look at Cowboys who took Dak and Elliot. Having a franchise RB who can also catch would have taken the heat off any of the QBs to develop into however the team wanted. Hyde isn't that kind of RB. But they obviously had a clear plan B if Barkley was snapped up.
Talk of Witten retiring to work for ESPN, some timing if its true @LeTallecWiz