It seems to me they struggled badly without him and when he has to play in defense
regards
regards
Money can't buy you love...
- Thread starter Ryan
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
[quote author=the_khl link=topic=34371.msg894887#msg894887 date=1245924487]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=34371.msg894885#msg894885 date=1245924070]
[quote author=the_khl link=topic=34371.msg894878#msg894878 date=1245923075]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=34371.msg894873#msg894873 date=1245922840]
They were 2-3 years younger less than a year ago?
[/quote]
When the Season of 07/08 started they were 2 years younger than of today.
When the Season of 09/10 draws to a close they'll be 3 years older compared to the start of the 07/08 Season.
...And you're not even beeing pedantic.
[/quote]
What happened to 08/09?
[/quote]
What do you mean what happened?
[/quote]
You started going on about "back then" and 2/3 years ago and I don't understand why.
We're talking about last season - 08/09.
Essien started only 10 games for them in an injury ravaged season. They finished 3rd, 3pts off ourselves, despite the fact that they switched managers halfway into the season. The closest challenger finished 20 behinds them and City finished 33 points behind.
So essentially, you're saying that next season they'll struggle to finish in the top 4 if they don't have Essien for 10 games.
[quote author=keniget link=topic=34371.msg894885#msg894885 date=1245924070]
[quote author=the_khl link=topic=34371.msg894878#msg894878 date=1245923075]
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=34371.msg894873#msg894873 date=1245922840]
They were 2-3 years younger less than a year ago?
[/quote]
When the Season of 07/08 started they were 2 years younger than of today.
When the Season of 09/10 draws to a close they'll be 3 years older compared to the start of the 07/08 Season.
...And you're not even beeing pedantic.
[/quote]
What happened to 08/09?
[/quote]
What do you mean what happened?
[/quote]
You started going on about "back then" and 2/3 years ago and I don't understand why.
We're talking about last season - 08/09.
Essien started only 10 games for them in an injury ravaged season. They finished 3rd, 3pts off ourselves, despite the fact that they switched managers halfway into the season. The closest challenger finished 20 behinds them and City finished 33 points behind.
So essentially, you're saying that next season they'll struggle to finish in the top 4 if they don't have Essien for 10 games.
God, what a dumb thread. Do we seriously believe that Chelski won't sign some hugely expensive and talented players this summer? They've got CL football, they've got a big-name manager, they've got an uber-loaded owner, they're based in London, and they've got a high-quality, very deep (and yes, slightly ageing) squad. They're still a very attractive proposition for most of the world's players, and anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=34371.msg894780#msg894780 date=1245916815]
Pato is coming to Chelsea ive heard.
45m bid accepted.
Dont know how real it is, but i wouldnt get to gloating just yet.
[/quote]
Quack Quack.
It would be interesting to see how he gets on the Premiership if he does come.
Pato is coming to Chelsea ive heard.
45m bid accepted.
Dont know how real it is, but i wouldnt get to gloating just yet.
[/quote]
Quack Quack.
It would be interesting to see how he gets on the Premiership if he does come.
This thread should have been quashed after two posts.
T
the_khl
Guest
This thread is awesome.
- Status