[quote author=keniget link=topic=34371.msg894853#msg894853 date=1245922122]
the_khl, please answer the following:
1. If Chelsea are so weak without Essien, how is it that they managed to get 3rd place with 83 points in a season that he only managed to start 10 games?
2. The 5th placed side were 20 points off them and City finished 33 points behind. What will happen to Chelsea next season that they're dropping 20 or so points?
[/quote]
1. They were all 2-3 years younger back then if I'm not mistaken? You can't neglect the fact that several key-members of their squad is quite older than compared to their main competitors. E.g. the likes of Torres, Gerrard, Adebayor, Van Persie, Rooney, Berbatov, Robinho, Tevez, Santa Cruz et all are all several years younger than Anelka/Drogba. If they loosed one of those two then they'd be in a right awful mess. If they loose Ballack, 33, then they'd had to rely on Lampard, Mikel and Deco in central midfield without having Essien around? It's pretty much the same all over the pitch except in defense for the Chavs.
2. That was last Season Keni. I don't think you can ever rely on these kind of empiric stats to predict how the next Season will turn out? Players will move on, get older, get injured etc. Citeh will by all means come out stronger this coming Season and so will Arsenal. That, alongside Chelsea looking weaker/older, especially without their most influential player in Essien, will make them very much equally strong.