Hansern stick to copying and pasting bullshit from twitter, it suits you better. As for my 'self learned' knowledge, well that's just another instance of you being wrong, nothing new there. You're a typical clueless football fan who has no idea what makes football clubs successful, but don't worry you aren't alone.
It's the most obvious thing in the world, but the one thing that has consistently seen Premiership teams improve their league position is increases in wage bills and transfer spending. Look at United, Chelsea, Man City. To a lesser extent look at Sunderland, Spurs, Villa and Stoke.
So, given FFP rules, our bloated wage bill and the possibility that future significant revenue growth is unlikely absent regular CL football - there appear to be two options:
Hope the limited funds we have available and a new manager are enough to see us in the CL regularly, which has failed a couple of times already and compounded our financial situation.
Or accept our squad is poor despite the money spent on it, gut it, raise as much funds as possible, lower the wage bill as much as possible, accept another couple of years of shite in the knowledge that when we increase our spending again we'll shoot up the table and if we get our decisions right we'll win the league.
You might note option two was my preferred option when Hodgson took over, and I said at the time was the advantage would be that with more financial flexibility we could pick up players for nothing from the multitude of teams that will struggle with FFP. And that I felt we would be shite even if we took option 1.
Looks like self learned Internet knowledge won out again, and it will be the same in two years time. But I tell you what, you put your faith in bright young managers and proven Premierahip players and we'll revisit this in two years time, at which point you can apologise for being stupidly wrong again.