• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Liverpool to sign Chamakh ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roger REDerer

Active
Member
From BBC Sport Gossip Column :

Liverpool are set to beat Arsenal to the summer signing of Bordeaux striker Marouane Chamakh who is available on a free transfer at the end of the season.
Full story: Daily Mail

Or, Liverpool have agreed a £25m deal with Bordeaux and will sign the Morocco international before the end of the month.
Full story: Daily Mirror


Frankly, I know nuts about him. Has anyone watch him play ? Is he any good ? Worth the money we're offering for him ?
 
Haha. For 25mil we'd want to expect to get Gourcuff aswel and about 10 million change.
 
Poor the Rger...
I think its more like £2,5M if he goes now or he can sign for a club in january and leave for free in summer
 
Nope the package according to the mirror is 12mill signing on fee and 60 grand a week 5 year deal. Which is aboout 25mil. This goes all to the player and not the club.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Liverpool-agree-25million-transfer-deal-for-Arsenal-and-West-Ham-target-Marouane-Chamakh-article285677.html

Marouane Chamakh has agreed to join Liverpool in a £25million deal the club hope will signal their transfer intent.

The highly rated striker is wanted by Arsenal, Juventus, Inter Milan and West Ham, but the Reds have stolen a march by offering a big money pre-contract agreement they expect the player to sign before the end of the month.

Bordeaux striker Chamakh is out of contract at the end of the season, and he signaled his intent to wait for a move until the summer, when he can command a massive signing on fee, in the absence of a transfer fee.

That has put off Arsenal, who were hoping to tempt the Morocco international to come to north London during the current transfer window, by paying a small fee to his French club.

But after intensive negotiations at the weekend with the player, Liverpool believe they have a deal and are prepared to use the money they will raise through sales during the current window to pledge to the 26 year old.

It could cost them as much as a £12million signing on fee, and a contract in the region of £60,000 a week, which would amount to a massive outlay approaching £25million over the course of a five year deal.

But the player is one of the hottest strikers in Europe, and the Anfield club's hierarchy see his capture as a signal of intent to go for the best young players to build for the future.

There has been growing unrest amongst the fans at the lack of activity in the current transfer window, and there have been protests complaining that money is instead being diverted towards debt reduction.

But senior officials at the club, along with manager Rafa Benitez, point to a policy of now going for top young players instead of 'buying around the edges' of the transfer market - a high risk strategy that has not worked at Anfield over the past few seasons.

Manager Benitez has traded incessantly in the hope of finding talent without paying inflated prices, but it has seen a huge turnover of players, with little success. He has now signed almost 100 players since he arrived at the club, but his most successful buys have been the established stars he spent big money on.

The Anfield boardroom therefore, has resisted the temptation to bring in squad players this January, and instead have committed the money raised from the sale of Andrea Dossena, Andreiy Voronin, and possibly Philipp Degen and Ryan Babel, to the capture of Chamakh.

He held a meeting with Liverpool officials last week, and agreed in principle terms that will bring him to England next season, and now the Anfield club is waiting for his signature on a pre-contract deal, which is permitted under the Bosman ruling.

There is still a chance for Arsenal to steal in and offer similar terms, but even though manager Arsene Wenger has long pursued the striker, he has insisted he will not pay the sort of money Liverpool are prepared to go to.

Dossena and Voronin have already left, bringing in around £5million so far, and Babel is the subject of a £9million bid from Birmingham. He could still be sold, allowing Liverpool to finance the Chamakh deal.

Owner Tom Hicks has stated that there will be further buys in the summer, describing it as a "big window", and officials at the club have made clear summer buys will be on top of the Chamakh deal, which they regard as the big move of the January window.

They hope that will diffuse the criticism, with Liverpool effectively spending more than their big four rivals, and even Manchester City, in the current window, as they attempt to plan for the future.
 
[quote author=Redshrek link=topic=38417.msg1032138#msg1032138 date=1263342866]
Nope the package according to the mirror is 12mill signing on fee and 60 grand a week 5 year deal. Which is aboout 25mil. This goes all to the player and not the club.
[/quote]

12m signing on fee is beyond crazy, and is plain wrong. 1.2m is pushing it but more understandable.
 
[quote author=Peatcheo link=topic=38417.msg1032147#msg1032147 date=1263343604]
£12 million signing on is crazy! Is he any good?
[/quote]

For a striker he's got pretty shit goals scored record. Will try and find it.
 
[quote author=Peatcheo link=topic=38417.msg1032147#msg1032147 date=1263343604]
£12 million signing on is crazy! Is he any good?
[/quote]

Yeah, he's the new Zid......
 
[quote author=LarryHagman link=topic=38417.msg1032151#msg1032151 date=1263343789]
[quote author=Peatcheo link=topic=38417.msg1032147#msg1032147 date=1263343604]
£12 million signing on is crazy! Is he any good?
[/quote]

Yeah, he's the new Zid......


[/quote]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
[quote author=Redshrek link=topic=38417.msg1032154#msg1032154 date=1263343876]
He's played 232 times and scored 55 yes that is 55 times in his entire carrer. So nearly 1 in every 5 games.
[/quote]

In the French league? Wowzers.

We should go Dutch. As least their shit players manage to score 673 goals in 29 games to get us excited.
 
[quote author=darkstarexodus link=topic=38417.msg1032158#msg1032158 date=1263344298]
Someone needs to come up with some more evidence for me to either think this is likely or to want it to happen.
[/quote]

Wenger is a very VERY keen admirer of the lad.

Im happy with that as 80% of the time Wenger signs very classy players. Even the ones that didnt seem to work out had unbelievable ability.. Reyes for example had amazing dribbling ability and was incredibly fast.

12 million signing on fee however sounds nuts.. why would he bother trying? he is already set for life.
 
Note the article says "It could cost them[Liverpool] as much as a 12m signing on fee".

Rough translation - "It'll cost no-where near 12m"
 
Never heard of him. His scoring record in the French League is hardly anything to write home about.
I'd rather see Ecclestone and Dalle Valle brought through and turned into 1st team stars.
 
I haven't a clue whether we should sign this guy.

I'll keep you all posted on whether I ever know anything.

Stay tuned, if you click on my name you can get access to all my latest posts and see if I ever have anything to say on this issue.
 
[quote author=gene hughes link=topic=38417.msg1032172#msg1032172 date=1263356080]
I haven't a clue whether we should sign this guy.

I'll keep you all posted on whether I ever know anything.

Stay tuned, if you click on my name you can get access to all my latest posts and see if I ever have anything to say on this issue.
[/quote]

Is there a way to be automatically updated on whether you have an opinion? If there's someway I can be notified on my mobile while at work when you develop one that would be great. Any of the techy lads? Sunny? Anyone?
 
If true, does that not sound a little bit desperate?

That's a fuckload of money for a target man that doesn't score goals and, if we don't change the formation, will only be backup. Still, we *do* need a striker...
 
The disconcerting thing for me, other than the fact that I've never seen him play well (or a least well enough to justify this level of interest), is that the clamour to sign him has largely been fuelled by his contract situation. It would be disingenuous to neglect to mention that last year was very successful for him, but even so... if his price was a straight up 20M, would everyone still be looking to sign him?

I can't really get excited by this. Someone tell me how good he is.
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=38417.msg1032198#msg1032198 date=1263369631]
The disconcerting thing for me, other than the fact that I've never seen him play well (or a least well enough to justify this level of interest), is that the clamour to sign him has largely been fuelled by his contract situation. It would be disingenuous to neglect to mention that last year was very successful for him, but even so... if his price was a straight up 20M, would everyone still be looking to sign him?

I can't really get excited by this. Someone tell me how good he is.
[/quote]

I'll say this - I've seen him a few times and have never been impressed. He does ooze class at times but he doesn't seem to do it consistently. His goalscoring record is very average for a player who's receiving so much attention.

I will say this however - I never in my wildest dreams though Torres would do what he's done here, and his record in Spain wasn't great and he also struggled to reach his potential. Maybe we can strike gold twice?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom