And you guys laughed at me!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ace-40million-valuation-Daniel-Sturridge.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ace-40million-valuation-Daniel-Sturridge.html
Liverpool name their valuation for Studge
- Thread starter redhorizon2
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
I also said £7m for Stewart and the press are now reporting the club want £10m. I said the market is fucked, and my valuations I don't think are way off.
How can he 'ponder' his future? What the fuck are his options? Sit in the stand for us or sit in the stand for someone else? You'd have to be seriously fucked in the head to pay 40M for him. He'll go somewhere on loan till he can leave on a free.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using SixCrazyMinutes mobile app
Sent from my GT-I9505 using SixCrazyMinutes mobile app
We'll get good money for him, Shame we didn't sell him when he was worth 50
Depends on the standard of comfort in the treatment room, I guess.
After the Carroll debacle, I'm amazed if West Ham are seriously interested in getting another crocked high wage earner on their books. But we should deffo hold out for a big sum. He'll still get an England call up the next time he's even vaguely fit, and in terms of quality he's superb. Clubs will either have to take a gamble or not, but they can't buy him as some kind of liability, they'll have to buy him as a top quality striker.
Cue 'undisclosed fee' of £3m for Stewart.
Wherever he goes there should defo not be any appearance clauses in the fee.
The £40 mill.figure's an opening gambit. It all depends on what offers we actually get. I simply don't believe the club would turn down (say) £25 mill.upwards.
He's likely to be just as injured at a new club so he'll be wondering why take a paycut for it. The club will have to top-up his wages were we to find a buyer, which complicates negotiations. I don't think its guaranteed he's leaving permanently TBH. Like you say, a loan looks most likely.
Some Chinese club needs him - badly.
China might suit him better, it's a far less physically intense league and I know he will score loads
To be fair to him, Wenger has started him as right wing back, and he's effectively been a right back in the first half.
Which is pretty pointless.
Yes. Although, with the ball, he's still quite ineffective. Overhit crosses and first time passes to nobody.
Might suit us better too, as it's probably where we'd get the best offer(s) from. Maybe the £40 mill.announcement was made with that in mind.
it's funny how city/chelsea/united would easily value him at around that if they had him but we're laughing at our team for valuing him at that (because of injuries etc)
why not value at that? who cares if he's worth it or not, some chinese club will see it as a great deal and want him as a high profiler. clubs like west ham would probably pay 25-30m on him anyway!
why not value at that? who cares if he's worth it or not, some chinese club will see it as a great deal and want him as a high profiler. clubs like west ham would probably pay 25-30m on him anyway!
- Status