Anyone who thinks a fit Sturridge and coutinho would have propelled us easily in to top 4 is mental
Semantics. Won / Decided, now whose being patronising. Won over an entire season is more than stating the obvious, however I'm happy to see you finally admitting that they can be decided by a single incident.I understand the point perfectly because, despite your attempts to dress it up, it is a very simplistic view.
Your second line "some championships are won on a single incident" says it all. They are not. They can be decided on a single incident, but they are won over an entire season.
Try and be less patronising though eh, it's only football and opinions.
Semantics. Won / Decided, now whose being patronising. Won over an entire season is more than stating the obvious, however I'm happy to see you finally admitting that they can be decided by a single incident.
I've maintained the same position throughout this thread. You on the other hand are wall over the place .... flip flopper.There's nothing patronising about that. There is a clear distinction between the two on this point. Happy to sub those two words for something else if it helps.
Finally admitting? I have never said otherwise. What I have said is that these moments that fans latch onto are not the sole reason for a championship win. You're arguing against that for some unknown reason, like it is some kind of falsehood. Bizarre.
Luck will always be a major factor in the game, thankfully, and most teams winning big trophies need it to go all the way, I don't think many posters would argue otherwise. Even if you are Barcelona, you'll need it to swing it your way against Real and so on.
Having said that where Leicester are today and Spurs for that matter is not down to 'luck' - that's at least not how I see it. They may have been lucky in games and with certain decisions but you don't sit in the front seat of the PL in February purely on luck but you could perhaps argue that the team winning it in the end may have rode their luck a bit more than the team missing out. But it's not mainly down to luck that they are not sitting where we are and vice versa.
All this talk about luck, fluke etc. is quite frankly a lack of respect towards the Foxes achievement so far isn't it? And even more so when you look at how convincing they have looked most season.
@Judge Jules
The reason why I believe Leicester's run of form and aim at the crown is very good for the league in general mate, is down to the obvious fact that they underline that it's not all about money. We have talked a lot over the years how money has ruined the game and maybe, just maybe, this could somehow indicate that money has become less important - if you have them. And by that I mean, can you hold on to your players (which is obv also a very costly expense these days) then the gain from buying like mad men becomes less obvious compared to those 'building' teams from within, keeping squads intact.
It's been said over and over again but the combined cost of their team could only buy them one of Raheem or Sterling. It's crazy. Their team gel, they have a plan, they have got a lot of the right players in the right positions and a manager that make them perform well. They have managed to get a lot of their key players hitting form at the right time and stay clear of too many injuries. But they haven't spend big on any one player. It's not their large wallet that has taken them there.
This will inevitably mean that, at least on paper, that the next years PL seems bang open. It will give teams with lesser budgets than City, United and Chelsea a large boost of morale, knowing that it's possible to compete. That the league CAN be won on the training-ground, through clever tactics and the right, but not expensive, players. Personally I am not even sure Leicester will disappear over night either, can they keep most of their core and add a few more - maybe unheard of - players (like Amartey, who's going to be great for them) then why not?
PS Had the likes of Coutinho and Sturridge stayed fit, I am personally convinced we'd at a push only be sitting a few places higher in the table - no more. Too many things and too many players are not right at the moment, they wouldn't have changed that not even in a perfect, injury-free world. I don't believe that for a second.
Luck will always be a major factor in the game, thankfully, and most teams winning big trophies need it to go all the way, I don't think many posters would argue otherwise. Even if you are Barcelona, you'll need it to swing it your way against Real and so on.
Having said that where Leicester are today and Spurs for that matter is not down to 'luck' - that's at least not how I see it. They may have been lucky in games and with certain decisions but you don't sit in the front seat of the PL in February purely on luck but you could perhaps argue that the team winning it in the end may have rode their luck a bit more than the team missing out. But it's not mainly down to luck that they are not sitting where we are and vice versa.
All this talk about luck, fluke etc. is quite frankly a lack of respect towards the Foxes achievement so far isn't it? And even more so when you look at how convincing they have looked most season.
@Judge Jules
The reason why I believe Leicester's run of form and aim at the crown is very good for the league in general mate, is down to the obvious fact that they underline that it's not all about money. We have talked a lot over the years how money has ruined the game and maybe, just maybe, this could somehow indicate that money has become less important - if you have them. And by that I mean, can you hold on to your players (which is obv also a very costly expense these days) then the gain from buying like mad men becomes less obvious compared to those 'building' teams from within, keeping squads intact.
It's been said over and over again but the combined cost of their team could only buy them one of Raheem or Sterling. It's crazy. Their team gel, they have a plan, they have got a lot of the right players in the right positions and a manager that make them perform well. They have managed to get a lot of their key players hitting form at the right time and stay clear of too many injuries. But they haven't spend big on any one player. It's not their large wallet that has taken them there.
This will inevitably mean that, at least on paper, that the next years PL seems bang open. It will give teams with lesser budgets than City, United and Chelsea a large boost of morale, knowing that it's possible to compete. That the league CAN be won on the training-ground, through clever tactics and the right, but not expensive, players. Personally I am not even sure Leicester will disappear over night either, can they keep most of their core and add a few more - maybe unheard of - players (like Amartey, who's going to be great for them) then why not?
PS Had the likes of Coutinho and Sturridge stayed fit, I am personally convinced we'd at a push only be sitting a few places higher in the table - no more. Too many things and too many players are not right at the moment, they wouldn't have changed that not even in a perfect, injury-free world. I don't believe that for a second.
As have I. We'll leave it there, I'm sure if there's one thing we can agree on it's that this has become very boring now.I've maintained the same position throughout this thread. You on the other hand are wall over the place .... flip flopper.
It's a very good question and I honestly also believe that Leicester's owner, manager and players are also quite surprised by it all. There is, as you say, an extremely gap between relegation fodder and title aspirants, especially during the course of a Season.OK, quick question, and this is for everyone...ready?
If it's not luck and a gigantic fluke aberration, what the *fuck* happened to Leicester last season?
Where was Mahrez and Vardy's output then? Was that all planned? Nearly get relegated, sack a manager, employ a laughable old duffer who has never won anything in 40 years, and finally THE MASTERPLAN will bear fruit! Vardy will score more than 5 goals! Mahrez will quadruple his assists! Kasper will concede half as many goals! Robert Huth will be a defensive colossus! Danny Drinkwater will be an England hopeful! Albrighton will be a wing wizard!
What amazing foresight and planning.
Brendan there's a significant difference between the Leicester of 2014/15 and this season. The evolution started towards the end of last season and coincided with that great run they went on to avoid relegation. Firstly, Vardy was nearly always sub for the first part of the season and even when he did play he was played wide left to accommodate Nugent and Ulloa (or sometime Kramaric). Pearson obviously thought Vardy was the least potent of his strikers and only played him up front near the end of the season when Nugent got injured and Kramaric was out of form. This coincided with Mahrez becoming a regular starter as prior to that he was in-and-out of the team and usually hauled off early when he started.OK, quick question, and this is for everyone...ready?
If it's not luck and a gigantic fluke aberration, what the *fuck* happened to Leicester last season?
Where was Mahrez and Vardy's output then? Was that all planned? Nearly get relegated, sack a manager, employ a laughable old duffer who has never won anything in 40 years, and finally THE MASTERPLAN will bear fruit! Vardy will score more than 5 goals! Mahrez will quadruple his assists! Kasper will concede half as many goals! Robert Huth will be a defensive colossus! Danny Drinkwater will be an England hopeful! Albrighton will be a wing wizard!
What amazing foresight and planning.
If they win those are the highest odds for an individual win ever. The highest for a horse was 250/1.Yes, it's not luck anymore, it's time to start giving them the respect they have earned for this run - they've been the most consistent team in the league this season.
Yup. Cambiasso should have been a big loss indeed. He was superb.
Mate - did you see those matches Spurs still have to play ? Plus at least 2 EL matches (likely more) and at least 1 FAC (likely more). I think it will lake it's toll and don't think they'll get near Leicester or Arsenal.Yes I still think Leicester and Spurs are the two most likely.
They do have a tougher run-in but they probably also have the biggest squad to use from and certainly are the in-form team right now. They got very lucky with the pen but over the 90 minutes they were easily the better team.Mate - did you see those matches Spurs still have to play ? Plus at least 2 EL matches (likely more) and at least 1 FAC (likely more). I think it will lake it's toll and don't think they'll get near Leicester or Arsenal.
Really ? We must have been watching different matches. City vs Spurs : Shots 19 (4) - 6 (3 inc. penalty), Corners 7-1.They do have a tougher run-in but they probably also have the biggest squad to use from and certainly are the in-form team right now. They got very lucky with the pen but over the 90 minutes they were easily the better team.
I must disagree with the forum then when it comes to Spurs and their strength of depth. They have lost Vertonghen a while back - a player that have been amazing most season and in many ways has been the Londoners answer to City's Kompany at the back.Really ? We must have been watching different matches. City vs Spurs : Shots 19 (4) - 6 (3 inc. penalty), Corners 7-1.
And Spurs have the biggest squad ? Just recently this forum seemed to be in agreement that they have little strength in depth and that they are only in the Top 4 because injuries have been kind to them.
I think I remember seeing Wimmer on his jersey yesterday ?I must disagree with the forum then when it comes to Spurs and their strength of depth. They have lost Vertonghen a while back - a player that have been amazing most season and in many ways has been the Londoners answer to City's Kompany at the back.
They really haven't missed him much as Vimmer (I believe he's spelled) has just taken over effortlessly, which probably have a lot to do with their team plan and setup unless this bloke is another Dele Alli type of find.
They also recently lost their new attacking threat in N'jie and midfield dynamo Ryan Mason but others have stepped up and not only have they got quite some firepower in Kane, Son, Lamela, Alli, Chadli and Eriksen they've still also got a strong line-up to chose from in central with Carroll, Dier, Dembele and Bentaleb to pick from.
I honestly don't think that is a squad lacking strength in depth, actually rather the contrary - but we can agree they'd struggle without Kane and Eriksen, but name me a team without key-players performing that is competing for the Premiership.
OK, quick question, and this is for everyone...ready?
If it's not luck and a gigantic fluke aberration, what the *fuck* happened to Leicester last season?
Where was Mahrez and Vardy's output then? Was that all planned? Nearly get relegated, sack a manager, employ a laughable old duffer who has never won anything in 40 years, and finally THE MASTERPLAN will bear fruit! Vardy will score more than 5 goals! Mahrez will quadruple his assists! Kasper will concede half as many goals! Robert Huth will be a defensive colossus! Danny Drinkwater will be an England hopeful! Albrighton will be a wing wizard!
What amazing foresight and planning.
The world has gone truly mad when you're dissapointed when West Brom equalise against Leicester.
I wish i could just pack up football and kick it out of my life.
Is there an exorcist of this type anyone know?