[quote author=rurikbird link=topic=14248.msg327366#msg327366 date=1185850128]
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=14248.msg327333#msg327333 date=1185837838]
[quote author=rurikbird link=topic=14248.msg327307#msg327307 date=1185832835]
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=14248.msg327301#msg327301 date=1185832069]
Quite simply, I think the player most likely to forge a partnership with Torres is Kuyt. He has the intelligence and (IMO, obviously) the ability to make it work. Whether you think he's good enough to take us forward here is not really the issue. The issue is whether he is the best option we have available currently and I think it's pretty clear that he is.
[/quote]
I think it depends on where Torres will end up playing. If he plays second striker or "in the hole", than Crouch IMO would make a better partner because Crouch is simply a better inside the box striker than Kuyt. If Torres, on the other hand, plays up front, than Kuyt is clearly the best option we have to support him as a second striker.
[/quote]
Sorry mate but I think you've got that the wrong way around. Kuyt needs to play higher up the pitch to get the best out of him. That's what he did for Feyenoord. What's more, having Kuyt deep exploits his lack of pace making it very difficult for him to overlap and join the attack when necessary (as illustrated by his relative absence in the penalty area last season). The same isn't true of Torres. Not only can he link the play but he has the pace to burst through from deep. IMO, he's never looked truly comfortable as a 'first' striker for Atletico. He looks almost stranded at the top of the pitch. Such is his technical ability I think we'd benefit if he was more involved in the build up play.
As far as I'm concerned this system would play to each players strengths; yours would not.
[/quote]
OK, let's look at Kuyt's main strengths:
1. movement and positioning
2. work rate
3. intelligence
... and weaknesses:
1. lack of pace
2. inconsistent first touch
3. inconsistent finishing
Now, where do you put such a striker to get the best out of him? Let's consider all possibilities.
1. First striker/target man/fox in the box.
The environment inside the penalty area is very different from all other areas of the pitch. One important difference is that it is the most congested area on the pitch with the least amount of space and time to operate. A top level defense almost never allows a striker more than one touch inside the area until he is surrounded and tackled. Therefore, first touch is by far the most crucial part of the game for inside the box strikers, because they only meet with the ball for that one touch, after that they either shoot or the chance is gone.
There are other important qualities too. One is positioning, because at top level you won't get even one touch if you don't win a struggle for position. So positioning is also a must-have. Then there are qualities like finishing and athleticism which determine what kind of inside the box striker you are, a stealth scorer in the mold of Robbie Fowler, Raul or Indzaghi (great finishing, no athleticism) or a target man who brings in other players like Drogba, Crouch or Koller (inconsistent finishing, great athleticism) with the likes of RvN, Trezeguet or Shearer somewhere in between. For Drogba, his athleticism is so overpowering that last season it compensated even for some of his technical shortcomings.
2. Second striker/withdrawn striker/in the hole.
That position is harder to pin down because there is such a great variety of second strikers and they are all very different. Some of them have good pace like Rooney and some are slow but very intelligent like Bergkamp. If there is something to be said about them in general is that the main prerequisites for a withdrawn striker are intelligence, creativity and movement. First touch is still important (it's important at any position), but less so than inside the box, because there is more space and time. Good finishing is welcome, but not required. Usually "in the hole" players are judged more but what they add to the attacking play in general than by the number of goals they score.
3. On the wing.
Pace and dribbling ability are usually the main prerequisites for a winger-striker. First touch and positioning are less important.
======
So where does it leave our Dirk Kuyt? He clearly doesn't belong on the wing, even though he played there sometimes for Holland. His first touch is not good enough for an inside the box striker. For a target man he doesn't have enough athleticism (his height is actually a little bit below average at 184cm), at least not in the Premiership. And for a stealth scorer he doesn't have good enough finishing finesse, although his positioning is top-notch. His movement and creativity and ability to cover a lot of ground will be lost if he is locked inside the box.
You might ask why than was he so successful playing up front in Holland? Well, why wouldn't he be successful when allowed two touches inside the box, against much less athletic defenders and being so intelligent and clearly a class above most of his opponents? He had all the qualities needed for a good target man in Holland, but that doesn't mean he has the qualities to be a target man on the top level.
He does have enough good qualities to be successful on top level, but in a different role. Playing withdrawn striker will take full advantage of his movement, creativity and work-rate and it will somewhat hide his problems with first touch and finishing. It would have been nice if he had more pace, but that's not a must-have for a successful second striker. Besides, if we had someone with pace (read: Torres) on the shoulder of the defender that would make through balls much more effective than if Kuyt was playing up front. So yes, I think they COULD make a good partnership with Torres, but it's Torres who should be mostly playing up front.
[/quote]
I can't believe this post was so criminally overlooked, when so much thought and detail had gone into it.
*applauds rurikbird*