• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Jürgen Klinsmann disappointed but not downbeat after World Cup elimination

Status
Not open for further replies.

hamstrung_pigeon

Well-Known
Member
Thought this was a pretty good interview.

---

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jul/02/klinsmann--usa-world-cup-elimination

Jürgen Klinsmann disappointed but not downbeat after World Cup elimination

• Coach says USA 'heading in the right direction' despite loss
• Young players to be picked for Gold Cup and Copa América

Paolo Bandini in São Paulo
theguardian.com, Wednesday 2 July 2014 22.57 BST

United States head coach Jurgen Klinsmann addresses the media in Sao Paulo, Brazil. United States head coach Jurgen Klinsmann said: 'We could have turned that game around. But why not do it earlier?'. Photograph: Julio Cortez/AP

The USA’s best player in Brazil was also their oldest: the 35-year-old Tim Howard excelled not only against Belgium but throughout the World Cup’s group stage.

But over the next 12 months, Jurgen Klinsmann intends to give youth a chance. Speaking to the press a day after his team’s elimination in the last 16, the coach said now was the time for the national team to bring new faces into the fold.

“A good thing about this next year is that we kind of have the opportunity to see a lot of young players coming to our platform, coming to the senior team,” said Klinsmann. “We can give them time to show where they are up to right now.

“The experienced players, or the older players, we can tell them for the next couple of months: ‘Go play in your club environment, we know you inside out anyway, we know what you bring to the table. But right now maybe there’s time for the next couple of friendlies that come up and over the next year that we want to see the young players grow and see how they can make it.’”

Klinsmann said he felt good about where things were headed with USA but suggested it was time to start pushing certain players harder than he had in the past.

“I think overall that we are going in the right direction,” he said. “With the competitions we have now happening every year, it just will help us to become more consistent, and more demanding on the players. Not just letting them get away with things.

“We need to get critical in certain moments, making them aware that, ‘Listen, if you had put that ball in the net yesterday, we would be in the next round.’ Without making it too harsh. They need that sense of accountability, that sense of criticism, and of the people around them that care about it.”

USA have plenty to keep them busy over the next couple of years. Next summer brings the Gold Cup, before the United States host the Copa América in 2016 – becoming the first country from outside South America ever to do so.

If Klinsmann’s team win the Gold Cup next year, they will also be guaranteed a place at the Confederations Cup in the summer of 2017. The manager characterised that as an important goal.

“For Gold Cup we want to go with the strongest team possible,” he continued. “It’s going to be similar to a World Cup, we want to play our best team, and then we can see how many of the experienced players are in it and how many are out. But this transition year coming up is definitely the opportunity to bring a lot of young players now through the ranks and see what they’re capable to do.”

Asked if US players were simply not talented enough to win a World Cup, Klinsmann deflected his answer on to the subject of preparation. “Well, we said before that we get benchmarked at the World Cup, and our benchmark ended last night,” he replied. “So there’s definitely stuff we have to improve and get better in.”

“It's many things off the field and it is many things on the field. Playing at that kind of a tempo, that kind of a rhythm every three or four days, this has to become the norm, which it’s not yet. The example is Fabian Johnson, who never played every four days with Hoffenheim because they don’t play Europa League or Champions League. So he only played one game every week. Now suddenly you hit this type of a level, the highest tempo and suddenly your body gives you signals. ‘Hey, I’m not sure about this’.

But Klinsmann did concede regret about his team’s failure to play as proactively as he would have liked. He argued that his team had proven at this World Cup that it was capable of playing on the front foot against good teams, but too often allowed themselves to fall a goal behind before finding the courage to do so.

“I think it’s a mentality topic,” he said. “We have to break through [that mentality] in a certain way, because the interesting part is that every time we go down a goal, we shift it up. Then we suddenly build the pressure higher up the field and we give our opponents the real game.

“There’s still this sense of too much respect. That’s why I tried to have so many friendly games against European teams to [get across the message that] ‘Yes, you respect your opponent, but you leave that respect off the field and go and give them the real games.

“We could have turned that [Belgium] game around in the last 15 minutes of extra time. Absolutely, we had enough chances even to win it 3-2 in extra time. But why not do it earlier? So this is a constant discussion we have.”
 
“We could have turned that [Belgium] game around in the last 15 minutes of extra time. Absolutely, we had enough chances even to win it 3-2 in extra time. But why not do it earlier? So this is a constant discussion we have.”

Isn't this the case with virtually every team at the WC ? And indeed often enough in the PL ? The only team I know that goes out to destroy their opponents from the off is Rodger's Liverpool 🙂
 
Klinsmann deffo says all the right things, and he's got all the post-2010 fans convinced that he's the savior of American soccer. He may be. But his "player mentality" rationale for the team looking like it stepped out of a time warp from 1994 is laughable. He's completely shifted the blame onto the players and absolved himself of any criticism of his player selection and tactics. Here's Donovan echoing what a lot of detractors have been saying, and simultaneously putting a final nail in the coffin of his own international career (active US players never call out coaches like this):

[fieldset=X|]Donovan, controversially omitted from the US roster, thinks Klinsmann backed off from a proactive approach leading to the World Cup and that doing so harmed the Yanks' chance to advance further.

"I think we're all disappointed in what happened yesterday. I think the most disappointing is we didn't seem like we gave it a real effort, from a tactical standpoint. I thought the guys did everything they could, they did everything that was asked of them, but I don't think we were set up to succeed yesterday, and that was tough to watch."

"It's a results-oriented business, and so, results-wise, you can hold your head high," he said. "If you really look at the performances, there were some good performances by guys, some not-so-good performances by guys. As a whole, I think tactically, the team was not set up to succeed.

"They were set up in a way that was opposite from what they've been the past couple years, which is opening up, passing, attacking – trying to do that. And the team's been successful that way. Why they decided to switch that in the World Cup, none of us will know. From a playing standpoint, I think the guys will probably be disappointed in the way things went."

"Hindsight is 20/20, so in hindsight you would say we should've been more attacking," he said. "Maybe if we had been more attacking, we would have gotten four counterattack goals scored against us. So you never know. ... But my feeling as a player, if I'm in that locker room before that game – before the Germany game, before the Belgium game – and the coach walked in and said we're playing a 4-5-1 and Clint [Dempsey] is up top by himself, I would have been disappointed. Because I would have said let's go for it. I want a chance to go for it and try to win the game."

Donovan did not address how things might have been different had he been part of the team in Brazil, but he noted that Michael Bradley played in an "unnatural position" at attacking midfield and he would have been more effective in a deeper role with another player in front of him.

Donovan's best position arguably is in such a slot.

"Michael was put in the wrong position," he said. "He was put in a position that he's not used to playing. He does a better job, as you saw with Julian Green's goal, being in a deeper position. And having someone in a front of him, someone to help Clint also, makes him that much better because he's got more opportunity to pick out different passes, more attacking options ahead of him. I think that was clearly an error."
[/fieldset]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom