• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

How Rafael Benitez's 'rant' didn't cost Liverpool FC the Premier League title

Status
Not open for further replies.

6TimesaRed

Not a Bot....
Administrator
Rafael Benitez wanted to talk about facts – but in the six years since the Spaniard directed that speech at Manchester United and Sir Alex Ferguson, fiction has taken over.

It was pegged as a rant, despite Benitez’s voice retaining similar cadence throughout; it was said to be a pivotal moment in the title race, although 37 games were yet to be played between the two sides.

It has also become known as the moment the championship tilted towards United; the press conference which gave Ferguson fresh life to bring the under-pressure Benitez down; the colossus of Anfield crumbling.

But at that time, Liverpool held a lead of just seven points over United, having played two games more.

When Benitez unfurled his piece of paper, his side’s title bid had started unfurling too - United were seven games into a 14-game run of clean sheets, picking up 17 points from a possible 21, while Liverpool had drawn four of their past seven.

Rafa’s so-called rant was not the reason their title bid fell short, but that is the myth perpetuated.

image-1-for-rafa-benitez-s-liverpool-fc-career-in-pictures-gallery-861349206.jpg


And now, it’s back. Foreign managers in surprise outbursts are back in vogue, it seems, with Louis van Gaal’s tactical tirade over long balls. No sooner had van Gaal finished waving his demonstrative dossier, and clips of Benitez followed.

Liverpool travelled to Stoke the following weekend and drew 0-0. Granted, Stoke were in a bad run of form, having not won in six games, but Tony Pulis’ Potters would ultimately lose just four home games in their first Premier League season.

Stoke’s previous home game, against Manchester United, had been a tight affair – but the pendulum swung towards United with a late red card for Andy Wilkinson, and an even later winning goal from Carlos Tevez.

When Liverpool came to the Britannia, Stoke were just as resolute, a side with Pulis’ indelible footprint all over them. Steven Gerrard hit the woodwork – twice – but it was not to be for the league leaders.

And yet, this was all because of Benitez’s actions; his words had disrupted the side and sent them into a tailspin. The reality, however, is that Liverpool drew at home with a motivated Everton, and then gave away a soft penalty seven minutes from time away to Wigan.

If Liverpool did throw away the title, they did so with home draws against Stoke, Fulham and West Ham. They did so by selling Robbie Keane, an undoubted flop after moving that summer, but still an option worth having on the bench.

But Liverpool didn’t throw it away. They would win 10 of their last 11 games, including a 4-1 victory at Old Trafford.

They simply fell short to a very good United side, one with a front three of Cristiano Ronaldo, Wayne Rooney and Tevez; a United side who, on two consecutive weeks, relied on a late Federico Macheda goal to turn two points into six.

This was a United side who would reach the Champions League final, and were widely tipped for the quadruple, and one who managed to keep 14 consecutive clean sheets in the league, Edwin van der Saar unbeatable for hours and hours.

Liverpool were a fine team and should consider themselves unfortunate not to win the title. Steven Gerrard and Fernando Torres, imperious throughout the season, started just 14 games between them. They lost just two games, but drew too many. Their reserves to call upon consisted of David N'Gog and Nabil El Zhar.
The stars just did not want to align for the Reds or Benitez.

None of that changed with a pre-prepared ‘rant’ – and no amount of revisionism should argue otherwise. Fact.
 
Rafa being ridiculously conservative and settling for draws is what cost us the title. I still remember the "oh, but we're still top" comments despite the fact that Utd had a load of games in hand... and then of course when our lead disappeared all those dropped points became important.
 
I recall Gerrard scored a free kick against Stoke in the home game, dead early in the game, equally early in the season, and the ref pulled it back and made him take it again. I thought it was no big deal, we'd twat them anyways. Oops.
 
I disagree with the analysis in terms of the games that cost us. I've never felt the 0-0 draws in the first half of the season were the real missed opportunities. On the whole our form during that period was excellent but we were missing Torres for almost all of it, and in a team set up to control games, losing a player like that was always bound to produce a couple of stalemates. It was a practically inevitable feature of that kind of team. All teams have some weakness or other and that was theirs.

IMO the games that lost it for us more than any (you might say the most avoidable of the dropped points) were precisely the ones the author chooses to gloss over: the late equalisers against Everton and Wigan and possibly one or two others around that time.
 
Home game v Stoke, still remember that terrible decision to disallow a goal early on.

We were great that season, Ferguson had the authorities in his pocket then - Rafa was 100% right but he didn't have the power or the charisma to change the system
 
I recall Gerrard scored a free kick against Stoke in the home game, dead early in the game, equally early in the season, and the ref pulled it back and made him take it again. I thought it was no big deal, we'd twat them anyways. Oops.

Yep.. What I thought too..

I didn't expect us to draw.. not at all..
 
He should have let the football do the talking and save the rant for after we had won the league.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom