Hillsborough taunting wanker gets lilt, a bouncy castle, a petting zoo and a load of abuse.

[Spionkop69]

See now, the blokes a cunt and yes, some of the pranks / revenge were amusing. But that's cost quite a few businesses money. Possibly some who can't afford that.

I was quite content with the fact that he outed himself as a cunt and now most of the viral world knows it. But he did it for attention and he got it.

He can think what he likes in my book, but if he's given to wearing t shirts like this, I'm pretty confident that he's not going to change his opinion on things because basically he's a lot of a thick cunt.

In my book, it's bigger punishment to leave them where they, thinking they're funny, relevant or controversial. The reality is, most normal people know he's a thick cunt.

 

[Woland]

Maybe relevant, but a mate from uni who lives in Wiltshire and is a bit of a Tory who doesn't give two fucks about football or many other working class pursuits rang me out the blue on Sunday to ask if I knew any swervy ways he could watch formula one coz he'd cancelled Sky as he's never giving that cunt Murdoch another bean as long as he lives.

The message does seem to be getting through.

 

[beejay]

Sorry, there's not a fucking chance that a provocative, offensive, horrible public display of abusive behaviour like that should be allowed to pass without some sort of action. If the law can't deal with it then the prick should be outed by social media and he gets what he deserves in terms of ridicule and condemnation.

Obnoxious cunt deserves a good kicking, fucking nasty wanker so a few verbals in his direction are the lowest end of the spectrum. I would think the same if someone wore a top mocking victims of any tragedy, low-lifes like that have to be called to account, free speech has its limits.

 

[C/O]

He's made his shitty bed, let him lie in it.

 

[Rosco]

Sorry, there's not a fucking chance that a provocative, offensive, horrible public display of abusive behaviour like that should be allowed to pass without some sort of action. If the law can't deal with it then the prick should be outed by social media and he gets what he deserves in terms of ridicule and condemnation.
.

The law is dealing with it. He has been charged.

The same should happen to all the twittercunts who put businesses out of pocket for their own amusement.

 

[Comical Aly]

The law is dealing with it. He has been charged.

The same should happen to all the twittercunts who put businesses out of pocket for their own amusement.

Any chance you'd share your address with us ?

 

[Rosco]

Any chance you'd share your address with us ?

On the condition that you send 2000 chicken nuggets, yes.

 

[manwithnoname]

He appears to be mentally ill

 

[Judge Jules]

Arguably so, but it rather depends on one's view of mental illness. If being a prejudiced @rsehole with the social skills of a haemorrhoidal ape indicates that he's mentally ill, fair enough, but I tend to the view that that's overmedicalising the problem.

 

[Spionkop69]

Sorry, there's not a fucking chance that a provocative, offensive, horrible public display of abusive behaviour like that should be allowed to pass without some sort of action. If the law can't deal with it then the prick should be outed by social media and he gets what he deserves in terms of ridicule and condemnation.

Obnoxious cunt deserves a good kicking, fucking nasty wanker so a few verbals in his direction are the lowest end of the spectrum. I would think the same if someone wore a top mocking victims of any tragedy, low-lifes like that have to be called to account, free speech has its limits.

But it wasn't allowed to pass without action. He got booted from the pub, he's been arrested and charged with an offence.

I'm just not comfortable with the fact that in trying to take revenge on him, people have cost people money. That's not to say it's not amusing that all these things were sent, but at the end of the day, it's not him who who's borne the cost of the pranks.

 

[doctor_mac]

Arguably so, but it rather depends on one's view of mental illness. If being a prejudiced @rsehole with the social skills of a haemorrhoidal ape indicates that he's mentally ill, fair enough, but I tend to the view that that's overmedicalising the problem.

Yeah, I don't think he's mental, I just think he's profoundly thick.