[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=38950.msg1055532#msg1055532 date=1266424271]
[quote author=Redshrek link=topic=38950.msg1055497#msg1055497 date=1266413585]
I'm sorry but you just need to scratch beneath the surface, and it's there to be seen how mediocre his record is. The guy has never in his career won a major leauge title. He won the Dutch leave and the dutch cup. He won the euro cup over 20 years ago. He went to real Madrid and was sacked within 6 months. He then went to another Spanish club and was sacked again by the end of the season. He then failed to gt a very good Russian side to he world cup. Ye but he won the fa cup, come on look at chelseas run to the final, coincidently Portsmouth won it the season before.
Look at it like this Liverpool appoint a manager. His record is this, bare in mind he's been in mangement for nearly 30 years.
Dutch leauge 6 times
Dutch cup 4 times
European cup 1
fa cup 1
I'm sorry but that's pretty ordinary. Yes his teams may play pretty football,unfortunatly you don't win trophys for that. The record he's got does not justify the reputation he has.
[/quote]
You're clearly wound up about Hiddink for whatever reason so I'm not sure why I'm bothering, but you ignore several key reasons why people wanted him here.
Firstly his international record in the last 8-10 years has been impressive, over-achieving with both Australia and South Korea, with both teams playing decent, spirited football.
However it was mainly because 12 months before he stabilised a sinking Chelsea ship and achieved a more than respectable finish. You can try and taunt the FA Cup all you like - although I wish any football fan wouldn't - under the circumstances the cup win coupled with a second place finish in the Premiership was a notable achievement and was the best Abramovich would have hoped for when the appointment was made.
A month or so ago we were in a very similar position, the lowest of the low, no light at the end of the tunnel, etc. If someone had come in and won us the biggest domestic trophy - do you actually think we'd be saying: "Well, who gives a shit? Portsmouth won it a year previous. Meh" Of course we wouldn't.
I'm not even Hiddink's biggest fan - part of me agrees largely with what you say; he does tend to be slightly over-rated at times. But you ruined a good point by overstating it.
[/quote]
The reason I get wound up about Hiddink is the fact that he is bigged up by the press and some football fans for no apparent reason. As i said he has a very average trophy haul. His international record isnt amazing neither, with regards to South Korea did he not have the south korean leauge shut down the seaosn be fore the world cup. That is a huge advantadge to have over the other teams. Also the Australia team where actually a pretty strong team in the 2006 world cup. I think the players they had were slightly underated. You had the likes of schwarzer, kewell, neill, moore, bresciano and viduka to name but a few. Russia was a disgrace that team he had should of qualifed for the world cup.
My point is the fact he seems to get superstar billing, but does not have a superstar record.
The Chelsea stuff as well baffles me this was the run to the FA cup final southend, ipswich, watford, coventry, arsenal & everton. Not the most difficult of runs. He improved chelsea by one spot and I wouldn't even compare it to the situation we faced this season.
[quote author=Redshrek link=topic=38950.msg1055497#msg1055497 date=1266413585]
I'm sorry but you just need to scratch beneath the surface, and it's there to be seen how mediocre his record is. The guy has never in his career won a major leauge title. He won the Dutch leave and the dutch cup. He won the euro cup over 20 years ago. He went to real Madrid and was sacked within 6 months. He then went to another Spanish club and was sacked again by the end of the season. He then failed to gt a very good Russian side to he world cup. Ye but he won the fa cup, come on look at chelseas run to the final, coincidently Portsmouth won it the season before.
Look at it like this Liverpool appoint a manager. His record is this, bare in mind he's been in mangement for nearly 30 years.
Dutch leauge 6 times
Dutch cup 4 times
European cup 1
fa cup 1
I'm sorry but that's pretty ordinary. Yes his teams may play pretty football,unfortunatly you don't win trophys for that. The record he's got does not justify the reputation he has.
[/quote]
You're clearly wound up about Hiddink for whatever reason so I'm not sure why I'm bothering, but you ignore several key reasons why people wanted him here.
Firstly his international record in the last 8-10 years has been impressive, over-achieving with both Australia and South Korea, with both teams playing decent, spirited football.
However it was mainly because 12 months before he stabilised a sinking Chelsea ship and achieved a more than respectable finish. You can try and taunt the FA Cup all you like - although I wish any football fan wouldn't - under the circumstances the cup win coupled with a second place finish in the Premiership was a notable achievement and was the best Abramovich would have hoped for when the appointment was made.
A month or so ago we were in a very similar position, the lowest of the low, no light at the end of the tunnel, etc. If someone had come in and won us the biggest domestic trophy - do you actually think we'd be saying: "Well, who gives a shit? Portsmouth won it a year previous. Meh" Of course we wouldn't.
I'm not even Hiddink's biggest fan - part of me agrees largely with what you say; he does tend to be slightly over-rated at times. But you ruined a good point by overstating it.
[/quote]
The reason I get wound up about Hiddink is the fact that he is bigged up by the press and some football fans for no apparent reason. As i said he has a very average trophy haul. His international record isnt amazing neither, with regards to South Korea did he not have the south korean leauge shut down the seaosn be fore the world cup. That is a huge advantadge to have over the other teams. Also the Australia team where actually a pretty strong team in the 2006 world cup. I think the players they had were slightly underated. You had the likes of schwarzer, kewell, neill, moore, bresciano and viduka to name but a few. Russia was a disgrace that team he had should of qualifed for the world cup.
My point is the fact he seems to get superstar billing, but does not have a superstar record.
The Chelsea stuff as well baffles me this was the run to the FA cup final southend, ipswich, watford, coventry, arsenal & everton. Not the most difficult of runs. He improved chelsea by one spot and I wouldn't even compare it to the situation we faced this season.